Nitrate and Ammonium Removals from Groundwater by Permeable Reactive Barrier Method (PRB): Column Experiments

被引:0
|
作者
Amani, Sohrab [1 ]
Akbari, Zahra [1 ]
Ghiassi, Reza [1 ]
Ehsani, Saeed [1 ]
Rezaeishirazi, Milad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Sch Civil Engn, Water & Environm Measurement & Monitoring Lab, Tehran, Iran
来源
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION | 2024年 / 235卷 / 02期
关键词
Groundwater contamination; In situ remediation; Permeable reactive barrier; Ammonium; Nitrate; Removal; DRINKING-WATER NITRATE; HEAVY-METAL; REMEDIATION; NITROGEN;
D O I
10.1007/s11270-024-06936-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the growth of industry and agriculture, nitrogenous compounds like nitrate and ammonium have contributed significantly to the contamination of groundwater. These pollutants cause intoxication and even may lead to stomach cancer. Permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is considered an in situ and low-cost method for groundwater treatment. This research aims to evaluate six different inexpensive reactive substances such as perlite and sand (1:1), cocopeat and sand (1:1), activated carbon, sawdust and sand (1:1), zeolite, and pumice for removing nitrate with an initial concentration of 100 mgL(-1) and three reactive materials such as Leca, vermiculite and pumice (1:1), and cocopeat and pumice (1:1) for removing ammonium with two initial concentrations of 20 mgL(-1) and 40 mgL(-1) utilizing column experiments. Some of these absorbents have been rarely used in PRB to remove nitrogenous compounds. The plexiglass column utilized in column experiments and water flow through the layer in the column is due to the constant head difference. Results showed that all the reactive materials that have been used in removing nitrate had good performance with a minimum removal percentage above 73%. The best performance among these reactive substances belonged to a mixture of perlite and sand (1:1) with a maximum removal efficiency of 100%. The mixture of cocopeat and pumice (1:1) had the best performance among the materials were chosen for the ammonium treatment, with maximum removal percentages of 80% and 70% for initial concentrations of 20 mgL(-1) and 40 mgL(-1), respectively. Variations in the permeability coefficient of the reactive materials were investigated in this study, as an essential factor in the lifespan of the reactant during the column experiments. Results of constant head permeability tests revealed that a rapid drop was observed in the reactive layer's permeability coefficient during the period leading up to the maximum removal percentage and then a subsequent minor decline occurred.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nitrate and Ammonium Removals from Groundwater by Permeable Reactive Barrier Method (PRB): Column Experiments
    Sohrab Amani
    Zahra Akbari
    Reza Ghiassi
    Saeed Ehsani
    Milad Rezaeishirazi
    [J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2024, 235
  • [2] A clay permeable reactive barrier to remove Cs-137 from groundwater: Column experiments
    De Pourcq, K.
    Ayora, C.
    Garcia-Gutierrez, M.
    Missana, T.
    Carrera, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2015, 149 : 36 - 42
  • [3] Laboratory column study for evaluating a multimedia permeable reactive barrier for the remediation of ammonium contaminated groundwater
    Kong, Xiangke
    Bi, Erping
    Liu, Fei
    Huang, Guoxin
    Ma, Jianfei
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 36 (11) : 1433 - 1440
  • [4] Application of Zeolite to Trace Metal Removal from Groundwater in Permeable Reactive Barrier Systems (PRB)
    Zawierucha, Iwona
    Malina, Grzegorz
    [J]. OCHRONA SRODOWISKA, 2014, 36 (01): : 39 - 44
  • [5] Performance of a permeable reactive barrier for in situ removal of ammonium in groundwater
    Hou, Guohua
    Liu, Fei
    Liu, Mingzhu
    Kong, Xiangke
    Li, Shengpin
    Chen, Liang
    Colberg, Patricia J. S.
    Jin, Song
    Chen, Honghan
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-WATER SUPPLY, 2014, 14 (04): : 585 - 592
  • [6] Column test-based optimization of the permeable reactive barrier (PRB) technique for remediating groundwater contaminated by landfill leachates
    Zhou, Dan
    Li, Yan
    Zhang, Yinbo
    Zhang, Chang
    Li, Xiongfei
    Chen, Zhiliang
    Huang, Junyi
    Li, Xia
    Flores, Giancarlo
    Kamon, Masashi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2014, 168 : 1 - 16
  • [7] Evaluation of Zeolite as a Potential Reactive Medium in a Permeable Reactive Barrier (PRB): Batch and Column Studies
    Carvalho Rocha, Liana Carolina
    Zuquette, Lazaro Valentin
    [J]. GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 10 (02)
  • [8] Use of permeable reactive barrier to mitigate groundwater nitrate contamination from on-site sanitation
    Rao, Sudhakar M.
    Malini, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 5 (02) : 336 - 340
  • [9] Sequential treatment of nitrate and phosphate in groundwater using a permeable reactive barrier system
    Buyanjargal, Altantsetseg
    Kang, Jiyoung
    Sleep, Brent E.
    Jeen, Sung-Wook
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 300
  • [10] Permeable reactive barrier for groundwater remediation
    Thiruverikatachari, R.
    Vigneswaran, S.
    Naidu, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 2008, 14 (02) : 145 - 156