How do supply or demand shocks affect the US oil market?

被引:0
|
作者
Vides, Jose Carlos [1 ]
Feria, Julia [2 ]
Golpe, Antonio A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Martin-Alvarez, Juan Manuel [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Appl & Struct Econ & Hist, Fac Econ & Business, Inst Complutense Estudios Int ICEI UCM, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Huelva, Dept Econ, Huelva, Spain
[3] Univ Huelva, Ctr Estudios Avanzados Fis Matemat & Comp, Huelva, Spain
[4] Inst Complutense Estudios Int ICE UCM, Madrid, Spain
[5] Int Univ La Rioja, Dept Quantitat Anal, Logrono, Spain
关键词
Asymmetries; Causality; Crude oil; Refined products; C22; Q31; Q41; CRUDE-OIL; GASOLINE PRICES; RETAIL GASOLINE; TIME-SERIES; UNIT-ROOT; ECONOMETRIC-MODELS; PASS-THROUGH; CAUSALITY; COINTEGRATION; FEATHERS;
D O I
10.1186/s40854-023-00561-8
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The study of the relationship between crude oil and its refined products prices may be perceived as an important tool for testing how are the dynamics and the type of integration of the petro-derivatives market in the United States. In this sense, we have applied a set of causality tests to study the possible presence of asymmetries in the relationship between WTI crude oil and each refined product price and to explore the type of market integration. Furthermore, the application of these causality tests lets us explore the validation of different hypotheses in the literature, such as the Rocket and Feathers hypothesis and the Verleger hypothesis. Our findings reveal that Reformulated Gasoline Blendstock for Oxygen Blending (RBOB), heating oil, diesel and kerosene are supply-driven integrated and conventional gasoline and kerosene are demand-driven integrated when linear effects are assessed. This behaviour changes deeply when the existence of asymmetries is tested, noticing that the Rocket and Feathers hypothesis is not fulfilled when a negative shock appears. Conversely, the Verleger hypothesis is supported when a negative shock appears for conventional gasoline and kerosene. These results provide important policy implications for investors, energy policymakers and refiners.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SUPPLY AND DEMAND FACTORS IN US CHEESE MARKET
    GRAF, TF
    [J]. AMERICAN DAIRY REVIEW, 1975, 37 (01): : B40 - &
  • [42] Reducing US vulnerability to oil supply shocks: Comment
    Tower, E
    [J]. SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1996, 62 (04) : 1093 - 1095
  • [43] Reducing US vulnerability to oil supply shocks: Reply
    Yucel, MK
    [J]. SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1996, 62 (04) : 1096 - 1097
  • [44] The Impact of US Supply Shocks on the Global Oil Price
    Gumlersen, Thomas S.
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (01): : 151 - 174
  • [45] Do oil shocks affect Chinese bank risk?
    Ma, Yu
    Zhang, Yang
    Ji, Qiang
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 96
  • [46] Exploring the Oil Supply-Demand Shocks and Stock market Stabilities: Experience from OECD Countries
    Dhaoui, Abderrazak
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Saidi, Youssef
    Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain
    Loganathan, Nanthakumar
    Mardani, Abbas
    [J]. ACTA MONTANISTICA SLOVACA, 2018, 23 (01) : 100 - 117
  • [47] The impact of demand and supply shocks on US hospitality index returns
    Chen, Ming-Hsiang
    [J]. TOURISM ECONOMICS, 2013, 19 (02) : 349 - 371
  • [48] US stock market regimes and oil price shocks
    Angelidis, Timotheos
    Degiannakis, Stavros
    Filis, George
    [J]. GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2015, 28 : 132 - 146
  • [49] THE IMPACT OF OIL PRICE SHOCKS ON THE US STOCK MARKET
    Kilian, Lutz
    Park, Cheolbeom
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 50 (04) : 1267 - 1287
  • [50] Asymmetric influence of oil demand and supply shocks on meat commodities
    Vatsa, Puneet
    Baek, Jungho
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 128