Dexmedetomidine versus Lignocaine in the Prevention of Etomidate-induced Myoclonus-A Randomised Double-blinded Study

被引:1
|
作者
Rajkumar, Gojendra [1 ]
Shammy, N. [1 ]
Thokchom, Rupendra Singh [1 ]
Singh, Takhelmayum Hemjit [1 ]
Dhayanithy, M. [1 ]
Devi, Konjengbam Reshmi [1 ]
Anish, M. [1 ]
Loving, Merlin Marita [1 ]
机构
[1] Reg Inst Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol, Imphal, Manipur, India
关键词
Efficacy; Four point severity scale; Incidence and severity; Induction agent; PRETREATMENT; MIDAZOLAM; INDUCTION; MOVEMENTS; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2023/60034.17439
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Etomidate is a preferred induction agent owing to its stable haemodynamic profile, minimal respiratory side-effects, minimal histamine release, cerebral protection and its property of rapid onset and short duration. However, myoclonus has been reported as one of its side-effects which poses great concern. Amongst the various drugs used to attenuate it, the role of intravenous (i.v.) Dexmeditomidine and Lignocaine have been reported in literature to be of great success. Aim: To compare the efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Lignocaine in preventing Etomidate-induced Myoclonus. Materials and Methods: The randomised, double blinded study included 104 adult consented patients, of either sex, American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) I and II, aged 18-65 years, undergoing routine surgery under general anaesthesia. They were randomly allocated into two groups of 52 patients each viz., Group I receiving 0.5 mu g/kg of injection (inj.) Dexmedetomidine i.v. and Group II 1 mg/kg of inj. Lignocaine diluted in 10 mL normal saline i.v. The incidence and severity of myoclonus were assessed and recorded within 90 seconds after etomidate injection using a four point severity scale. The collected data were entered in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0. Results: Total 104 subjects with the demographic parameters such as age, sex, ASA and weight comparable between the two groups were analysed. Group I recorded lesser number of patients (17, 32.7%) to myoclonus as compared with Group II (21, 40.4%), (p-value=0.41). Maximum patients in Group I developed grade I myoclonus while in Group II, it was grade 2. No patients in Group I developed grade 3 myoclonus as against 5 patients in Group II (p-value=0.03). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine and Lignocaine were equally effective in the prevention of Etomidate-induced myoclonus but dexmeditomedine was better because of lesser incidence of severe grade myoclonus.
引用
收藏
页码:UC01 / UC04
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Combination of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for labor analgesia: A double-blinded, randomized, controlled study
    Abdalla, Waleed
    Ammar, Mona Ahmed
    Tharwat, Ayman Ibrahim
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 9 (04) : 433 - 438
  • [32] Effect of intratracheal dexmedetomidine administration on recovery from general anaesthesia after gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomised double-blinded study
    Wang, Fei
    Zhong, Haoxiang
    Xie, Xiaoyan
    Sha, Weiping
    Li, Caili
    Li, Zhenping
    Huang, Zhuomei
    Chen, Chaojin
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (04):
  • [33] Dexmedetomidine versus propofol for prevention of emergence delirium in pediatric cataract surgery: Double blinded randomized study
    Amer, Ghada F.
    Abdallah, Maha Younis
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 38 (01): : 300 - 304
  • [34] Epidural Ropivacaine and Dexmedetomidine with that of Epidural Ropivacaine and Fentanyl for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgeries- A Randomised Double-Blinded Study
    Prashanth, G.
    Dash, Sulochana
    Mohapatra, Sudeep
    Moda, Nupur
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (08)
  • [35] Efficacy of dexmedetomidine for prevention of emergence agitation in patients posted for nasal surgery under desflurane anaesthesia: A prospective double-blinded randomised controlled trial
    Garg, Akaansha
    Kamal, Manoj
    Mohammed, Sadik
    Singariya, Geeta
    Chouhan, Dilip S.
    Biyani, Ghanshyam
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 62 (07) : 524 - 530
  • [36] Nebulised fentanyl, dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate for attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: A double-blinded, randomised comparative study
    Grover, Niharika
    Taneja, Rashmi
    Rashid, Yawar
    Shrivastava, Neha
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 67 (08) : 730 - 735
  • [37] Effect of clonidine versus dexmedetomidine on pain control after laparoscopic gastric sleeve: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study
    Naja, Zoher M.
    Khatib, Rania
    Ziade, Fouad M.
    Moussa, Georges
    Naja, Zeina Z.
    Naja, Ahmad Salah Eddine
    Kanawati, Saleh
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 8 (05) : S57 - S62
  • [38] Lichtenstein versus Onstep for inguinal hernia repair: protocol for a double-blinded randomised trial
    Andresen, Kristoffer
    Burcharth, Jakob
    Rosenberg, Jacob
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 60 (11):
  • [39] Comments on "combination of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for labor analgesia: A double-blinded, randomized, controlled study"
    Ramon Ortiz-Gomez, Jose
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 9 (04) : 341 - 342
  • [40] Effect of intratracheal dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine on postoperative sore throat: a prospective randomised double-blinded controlled trial
    Jingyi Niu
    Rui Hu
    Na Yang
    Yan He
    Hao Sun
    Rende Ning
    Junma Yu
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22