Dexmedetomidine versus Lignocaine in the Prevention of Etomidate-induced Myoclonus-A Randomised Double-blinded Study

被引:1
|
作者
Rajkumar, Gojendra [1 ]
Shammy, N. [1 ]
Thokchom, Rupendra Singh [1 ]
Singh, Takhelmayum Hemjit [1 ]
Dhayanithy, M. [1 ]
Devi, Konjengbam Reshmi [1 ]
Anish, M. [1 ]
Loving, Merlin Marita [1 ]
机构
[1] Reg Inst Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol, Imphal, Manipur, India
关键词
Efficacy; Four point severity scale; Incidence and severity; Induction agent; PRETREATMENT; MIDAZOLAM; INDUCTION; MOVEMENTS; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2023/60034.17439
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Etomidate is a preferred induction agent owing to its stable haemodynamic profile, minimal respiratory side-effects, minimal histamine release, cerebral protection and its property of rapid onset and short duration. However, myoclonus has been reported as one of its side-effects which poses great concern. Amongst the various drugs used to attenuate it, the role of intravenous (i.v.) Dexmeditomidine and Lignocaine have been reported in literature to be of great success. Aim: To compare the efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Lignocaine in preventing Etomidate-induced Myoclonus. Materials and Methods: The randomised, double blinded study included 104 adult consented patients, of either sex, American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) I and II, aged 18-65 years, undergoing routine surgery under general anaesthesia. They were randomly allocated into two groups of 52 patients each viz., Group I receiving 0.5 mu g/kg of injection (inj.) Dexmedetomidine i.v. and Group II 1 mg/kg of inj. Lignocaine diluted in 10 mL normal saline i.v. The incidence and severity of myoclonus were assessed and recorded within 90 seconds after etomidate injection using a four point severity scale. The collected data were entered in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0. Results: Total 104 subjects with the demographic parameters such as age, sex, ASA and weight comparable between the two groups were analysed. Group I recorded lesser number of patients (17, 32.7%) to myoclonus as compared with Group II (21, 40.4%), (p-value=0.41). Maximum patients in Group I developed grade I myoclonus while in Group II, it was grade 2. No patients in Group I developed grade 3 myoclonus as against 5 patients in Group II (p-value=0.03). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine and Lignocaine were equally effective in the prevention of Etomidate-induced myoclonus but dexmeditomedine was better because of lesser incidence of severe grade myoclonus.
引用
收藏
页码:UC01 / UC04
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A prospective randomized double-blinded study of dexmedetomidine versus propofol infusion for orbital surgeries
    Mukherjee, Bipasha
    Backiavathy, Varsha
    Suiatha, R.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 34 (02) : 77 - 81
  • [22] Controlled hypotension for FESS: A randomised double-blinded comparison of magnesium sulphate and dexmedetomidine
    Chhabra, Alka
    Saini, Preeti
    Sharma, Karuna
    Chaudhary, Neelam
    Singh, Abhineet
    Gupta, Sunanda
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 64 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [23] Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial
    Safavi, Mohammadreza
    Honarmand, Azim
    Sahaf, Ashraf Sadat
    Sahaf, Seyyed Mohammad
    Attari, Mohammadali
    Payandeh, Mahsa
    Iazdani, Alireza
    Norian, Nilofarsaddat
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2015, 4 (01) : 4 - 8
  • [24] Low-Dose Ketamine Pretreatment Reduces the Incidence and Severity of Myoclonus Induced by Etomidate A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial
    Wu, Guan-Nan
    Xu, Hai-Jun
    Liu, Fang-Fang
    Wu, Xian
    Zhou, Hai
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (06)
  • [25] Nalbuphine pretreatment for prevention of etomidate induced myoclonus: A prospective, randomized and double-blind study
    Gupta, Mayank
    Gupta, Priyanka
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 34 (02) : 200 - 204
  • [26] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of remifentanil versus different pharmacological approaches on prevention of etomidate-induced myoclonus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lang, Bingchen
    Zhang, Lingli
    Li, Fengshan
    Lin, Yunzhu
    Zhang, Wensheng
    Yang, Chunsong
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2019, 13 : 1593 - 1607
  • [27] A prospective, randomised, double-blinded trial to study the efficacy of topical tocotrienol in the prevention of hypertrophic scars
    Khoo, T. L.
    Halim, A. S.
    Zakaria, Z.
    Saad, A. Z. Mat
    Wu, L. Y.
    Lau, H. Y.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2011, 64 (06): : E137 - E145
  • [28] Haemodynamic consequences of etomidate administration in elective cardiac surgery: a randomized double-blinded study
    Morel, J.
    Salard, M.
    Castelain, C.
    Bayon, M. C.
    Lambert, P.
    Vola, M.
    Auboyer, C.
    Molliex, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 107 (04) : 503 - 509
  • [29] INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE VERSUS ORAL MIDAZOLAM FOR PREMEDICATION IN PEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA: A PROSPECTIVE DOUBLE-BLINDED RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY
    Yadav, S.
    Ramdas, E.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 123 : 354 - 354
  • [30] Low-dose nalmefene pretreatment reduces etomidate-induced myoclonus: A randomized, double-blind controlled trial
    Shan, Guofa
    Lu, Haixia
    Dai, Fang
    Liu, Yan
    Yin, Dekun
    Cao, Hanzhong
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (36) : E35138