The AO classification system for tibial plateau fractures: An independent inter and intraobserver agreement study

被引:0
|
作者
Besa, Pablo [1 ]
Angulo, Manuela [2 ]
Vial, Raimundo [1 ]
Vega, Rafael [1 ]
Irribarra, Luis [1 ]
Lobos, Daniel [1 ]
Sandoval, Felipe [1 ]
Irarrazaval, Sebastian [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Orthoped Surg, Diagonal Paraguay 362,Acad Bldg,3rd Floor, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Rosario, Sch Med, Bogota, Colombia
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2023年 / 54卷
关键词
Tibial plateau fracture; Classification; Agreement study; Reliability; X-ray; SCHATZKER; CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.028
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: Classifying tibial plateau fractures is paramount in determining treatment regimens and systemizing decision making. The original AO classification described by Muller in 1996 and the Schatzker classification of 1970 are the most cited classifications for tibial plateau fractures, demonstrating substantial to almost perfect agreement. The main problem with these classifications schemes is that they lack the detail required to convey the variety of fracture patterns encountered. In 2018, the AO foundation published a new classification system for proximal tibia fractures, highlighting a more complete and detailed number of categories and subcategories. We sought to independently determine inter and intraobserver agreement of the AO classification system, compared to the previous systems described by Muller and Schatzker. Methods: One hundred seven consecutive tibial plateau fractures were screened, and a representative data set of 69 was created. Six independent evaluators (three knee surgeons, three senior orthopedic residents) classified the fractures using the original AO, the Schatzker and the new AO classifications. After six weeks, the 69 cases were randomized and reclassified by all evaluators. The Kappa coefficient (k) was calculated for inter- and intraobserver correlation and is expressed with 95% confidence intervals. Results: interobserver agreement was moderate for all three classifications. k = 0.464 (0.383-0.560) for the original AO; k = 0.404 (0.337-0.489) for Schatzker; and k = 0.457 (0.371-0.545) for the base categories of the new AO classification. The inclusion of subcategories and letter modifiers to the new classification worsened agreement to k = 0.358 (0.302-0.423) and k = 0.174 (0.134-0.222), respectively. There were no significant differences between knee surgeons and residents for the new classification. Intra-observer correlation was also moderate for each of the scores: k = 0.630 (0.578-0.682) for the original AO; k = 0.623 (0.569-0.674) for Schatzker; and k = 0.621 (0.566-0.678) for the new AO base categories; without differences between knee surgeons or residents. Conclusions: This study demonstrated an adequate inter and intra-observer agreement for the new AO tibial plateau fractures classification system for its base categories, but not at the subcategory or letter modifier levels.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Inter- and intra-observer variation of the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications of tibial plateau fractures and a proposal of a new classification system (vol 89, pg 400, 2007)
    Charalambous, C. P.
    Tryfonidis, M.
    Alvi, F.
    Moran, M.
    Fang, C.
    Samarji, R.
    Hirst, P.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2007, 89 (05) : 478 - 478
  • [22] Reliability and Agreement of Different Spine Fracture Classification Systems: An Independent Intraobserver and Interobserver Study
    Pishnamaz, Miguel
    Balosu, Stephan
    Curfs, Inez
    Uhing, Daniel
    Laubach, Markus
    Herren, Christian
    Weber, Christian
    Hildebrand, Frank
    Willems, Paul
    Kobbe, Philipp
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 115 : E695 - E702
  • [23] Inter and Intraobserver Agreement of the IOOG SAMEO ATO Classification for Tympanomastoid Surgery
    Hickson, Craig
    Gao, Chuanyu
    Parsons, Nicholas
    Neumann, Codruta
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2022, 43 (06) : 643 - 649
  • [24] TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURES - A REVIEW OF OPERATIVE TREATMENT USING AO TECHNIQUE
    SAVOIE, FH
    VANDERGRIEND, RA
    WARD, EF
    HUGHES, JL
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1987, 10 (05) : 745 - 750
  • [25] Inter- and intra-observer agreement of the AO classification for operatively treated distal radius fractures
    van Buijtenen, Jesse M.
    van Tunen, Mischa L. C.
    Zuidema, Wietse P.
    Heilbron, Emile A.
    de Haan, Jeroen
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    Derksen, Robert J.
    STRATEGIES IN TRAUMA AND LIMB RECONSTRUCTION, 2015, 10 (03): : 155 - 159
  • [26] Inter and intra-observer agreement evaluation of the AO and the Tronzo classification systems of fractures of the trochanteric area
    Urrutia, Julio
    Zamora, Tomas
    Besa, Pablo
    Zamora, Maximiliano
    Schweitzer, Daniel
    Klaber, Ianiv
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2015, 46 (06): : 1054 - 1058
  • [27] An evaluation of intra and inter observer reliability of the five used classification systems of tibial plateau fractures
    Koksal, Alper
    Abul, Kadir
    Cimen, Osman
    Mert, Muhammed
    Keskin, Abdi
    Kargin, Deniz
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2022, 88 (04): : 805 - 810
  • [28] Comparison of AO, Schatzker, and three-column classification systems in tibial plateau fractures: Impact on functional outcomes
    Selcuk, Esref
    Erem, Murat
    Copuroglu, Cem
    Ozcan, Mert
    Ciftdemir, Mert
    JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2024, 35 (01): : 112 - 120
  • [29] Evaluation of simplified Frykman and AO classifications of fractures of the distal radius - Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver agreement
    Illarramendi, A
    Della Valle, AG
    Segal, E
    De Carli, P
    Maignon, G
    Gallucci, G
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 1998, 22 (02) : 111 - 115
  • [30] Evaluation of simplified Frykman and AO classifications of fractures of the distal radius Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver agreement
    A. Illarramendi
    A. González Della Valle
    E. Segal
    P. De Carli
    G. Maignon
    G. Gallucci
    International Orthopaedics, 1998, 22 : 111 - 115