The AO classification system for tibial plateau fractures: An independent inter and intraobserver agreement study

被引:0
|
作者
Besa, Pablo [1 ]
Angulo, Manuela [2 ]
Vial, Raimundo [1 ]
Vega, Rafael [1 ]
Irribarra, Luis [1 ]
Lobos, Daniel [1 ]
Sandoval, Felipe [1 ]
Irarrazaval, Sebastian [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Orthoped Surg, Diagonal Paraguay 362,Acad Bldg,3rd Floor, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Rosario, Sch Med, Bogota, Colombia
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2023年 / 54卷
关键词
Tibial plateau fracture; Classification; Agreement study; Reliability; X-ray; SCHATZKER; CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.028
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: Classifying tibial plateau fractures is paramount in determining treatment regimens and systemizing decision making. The original AO classification described by Muller in 1996 and the Schatzker classification of 1970 are the most cited classifications for tibial plateau fractures, demonstrating substantial to almost perfect agreement. The main problem with these classifications schemes is that they lack the detail required to convey the variety of fracture patterns encountered. In 2018, the AO foundation published a new classification system for proximal tibia fractures, highlighting a more complete and detailed number of categories and subcategories. We sought to independently determine inter and intraobserver agreement of the AO classification system, compared to the previous systems described by Muller and Schatzker. Methods: One hundred seven consecutive tibial plateau fractures were screened, and a representative data set of 69 was created. Six independent evaluators (three knee surgeons, three senior orthopedic residents) classified the fractures using the original AO, the Schatzker and the new AO classifications. After six weeks, the 69 cases were randomized and reclassified by all evaluators. The Kappa coefficient (k) was calculated for inter- and intraobserver correlation and is expressed with 95% confidence intervals. Results: interobserver agreement was moderate for all three classifications. k = 0.464 (0.383-0.560) for the original AO; k = 0.404 (0.337-0.489) for Schatzker; and k = 0.457 (0.371-0.545) for the base categories of the new AO classification. The inclusion of subcategories and letter modifiers to the new classification worsened agreement to k = 0.358 (0.302-0.423) and k = 0.174 (0.134-0.222), respectively. There were no significant differences between knee surgeons and residents for the new classification. Intra-observer correlation was also moderate for each of the scores: k = 0.630 (0.578-0.682) for the original AO; k = 0.623 (0.569-0.674) for Schatzker; and k = 0.621 (0.566-0.678) for the new AO base categories; without differences between knee surgeons or residents. Conclusions: This study demonstrated an adequate inter and intra-observer agreement for the new AO tibial plateau fractures classification system for its base categories, but not at the subcategory or letter modifier levels.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] INTER- AND INTRA-OBSERVER RELIABILITY OF SCHATZKER, AO, AND LUO CLASSIFICATIONS FOR TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURES
    de Alencar Neto, Jonatas Brito
    Duarte de Souza, Clodoaldo Jose
    Reis Coelho, Pedro Rafael
    de Freitas Junior, Pedro Gomes
    Gadelha Lopes, Marcio Bezerra
    Maia Pinto, Francisco Jose
    ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2020, 28 (05): : 216 - 220
  • [12] WhatsApp messenger is useful and reproducible in the assessment of tibial plateau fractures: Inter- and intra-observer agreement study
    Giordano, Vincenzo
    Koch, Hilton Augusto
    Mendes, Carlos Henrique
    Bergamin, Andre
    de Souza, Felipe Serrao
    do Amaral, Ney Pecegueiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2015, 84 (02) : 141 - 148
  • [13] Intraobserver and Interobserver Agreement in the Classification and Treatment of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures
    Jones, Grant L.
    Bishop, Julie Y.
    Lewis, Brian
    Pedroza, Angela D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (05): : 1176 - 1181
  • [14] Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in the classification and treatment of proximal humeral fractures
    Gracitelli, Mauro E. C.
    Dotta, Thiago A. G.
    Assuncao, Jorge H.
    Malavolta, Eduardo A.
    Andrade-Silva, Fernando B.
    Kojima, Kodi E.
    Ferreira Neto, Arnaldo A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (06) : 1097 - 1102
  • [15] Endoscopic classification of the papilla of Vater. Results of an inter- and intraobserver agreement study
    Haraldsson, E.
    Lundell, L.
    Swahn, F.
    Enochsson, L.
    Lohr, J. M.
    Arnelo, U.
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 5 (04) : 504 - 510
  • [16] Intraobserver and interobserver reliability assessment of tibial plateau fracture classification systems
    Taskesen, Anil
    Demirkale, Ismail
    Okkaoglu, Mustafa Caner
    Ozdemir, Mahmut
    Bilgili, Mustafa Gokhan
    Altay, Murat
    EKLEM HASTALIKLARI VE CERRAHISI-JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 28 (03): : 177 - 181
  • [17] What is the most reproducible classification system to assess tibial plateau fractures?
    Angélica Millán-Billi
    Mireia Gómez-Masdeu
    Eduard Ramírez-Bermejo
    Maximiliano Ibañez
    Pablo Eduardo Gelber
    International Orthopaedics, 2017, 41 : 1251 - 1256
  • [18] What is the most reproducible classification system to assess tibial plateau fractures?
    Millan-Billi, Angelica
    Gomez-Masdeu, Mireia
    Ramirez-Bermejo, Eduard
    Ibanez, Maximiliano
    Gelber, Pablo Eduardo
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 41 (06) : 1251 - 1256
  • [19] TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURES - CT EVALUATION AND CLASSIFICATION
    RAFII, M
    LAMONT, JG
    FIROOZNIA, H
    CRC CRITICAL REVIEWS IN DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, 1987, 27 (02) : 91 - 112
  • [20] Revisiting the Schatzker classification of tibial plateau fractures
    Kfuri, Mauricio
    Schatzker, Joseph
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2018, 49 (12): : 2252 - 2263