Prediction of groundwater level variations using deep learning methods and GMS numerical model

被引:21
|
作者
Amiri, Siamak [1 ]
Rajabi, Ahmad [1 ]
Shabanlou, Saeid [1 ]
Yosefvand, Fariborz [1 ]
Izadbakhsh, Mohammad Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Water Engn, Kermanshah Branch, Kermanshah, Iran
关键词
GWL prediction; GMS; Hybrid Models; LSTM; LS-SVM; ORELM; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SURFACE-WATER; MACHINE; RESOURCES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s12145-023-01052-1
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
One of the key elements of the hydrogeological cycle and a variable used by many water resource operating models is the variation in groundwater level (GWL). One of the biggest obstacles to the drawdown analysis and GWL forecasts is the absence of accurate and complete data. The application of diverse numerical models has been regarded as a reliable approach in recent years. Such models are able to determine the GWL for any given region by utilising a wide variety of statistics, data, and field measurements such as pumping experiments, geophysics, soil and land use maps, topography and slope data, a plethora of boundary conditions, and the application of complex equations. Artificial intelligence-based models need significantly less information. The purpose of this research is to predict the changes of GWL of Shazand plain by using the PSO-ANN, ACA-ANN hybrid methods and deep learning methods LSTM, LS-SVM, and ORELM and comparing with GMS numerical model. The model's accuracy is evaluated using a two-stage validation and verification process. Then Taylor's diagram was used to select the best model. Results show that ORELM with R, Nash, RMSE and NRMSE values equal to 0.977, 0.955, 0.512 and 0.058 respectively was the best performance in the test stage. After that is the PSO-ANN model. Using the Taylor diagram is another certain way to guarantee that you've picked the best possible model. The research results show that there is a link between the ORELM and the place that is most central to the reference point. Since the GMS model is complex and requires a large amount of data and a time-consuming calibration and validation process, the ORELM model can be utilised with certainty to predict the GWL across the entire plain. This research suggests that instead of using numerical models with a complex and time-consuming structure, deep learning methods with the least required data and with high accuracy should be used to forecast the groundwater level.
引用
收藏
页码:3227 / 3241
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Methods of process mining and prediction using deep learning
    Cieplak, Tomasz
    Rymarczyk, Tomasz
    Klosowski, Grzegorz
    Maj, Michal
    Pliszczuk, Damian
    Rymarczyk, Pawel
    PRZEGLAD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY, 2021, 97 (03): : 146 - 149
  • [32] Prediction of Stroke Using Deep Learning Model
    Chantamit-o-pas, Pattanapong
    Goyal, Madhu
    NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, ICONIP 2017, PT V, 2017, 10638 : 774 - 781
  • [33] GROUNDWATER LEVEL PREDICTION THROUGH GMS SOFTWARE - CASE STUDY OF KARVAN AREA, IRAN
    Bayat, Mandana
    Eslamian, Saeid
    Shams, Gholamreza
    Hajiannia, Alborz
    QUAESTIONES GEOGRAPHICAE, 2020, 39 (03) : 139 - 145
  • [34] Research on Typhoon Prediction by Integrating Numerical Simulation and Deep Learning Methods
    Lv, Tianyi
    Yu, Huaming
    Lin, Liangshi
    Tao, Yijun
    Qi, Xin
    ATMOSPHERE, 2025, 16 (01)
  • [35] Groundwater spring potential prediction using a deep-learning algorithm
    Solmaz Khazaei Moughani
    Abdolbaset Osmani
    Ebrahim Nohani
    Saeed Khoshtinat
    Tahere Jalilian
    Zahra Askari
    Salim Heddam
    John P. Tiefenbacher
    Javad Hatamiafkoueieh
    Acta Geophysica, 2024, 72 : 1033 - 1054
  • [36] Groundwater spring potential prediction using a deep-learning algorithm
    Moughani, Solmaz Khazaei
    Osmani, Abdolbaset
    Nohani, Ebrahim
    Khoshtinat, Saeed
    Jalilian, Tahere
    Askari, Zahra
    Heddam, Salim
    Tiefenbacher, John P.
    Hatamiafkoueieh, Javad
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2024, 72 (02) : 1033 - 1054
  • [37] Predicting groundwater level using traditional and deep machine learning algorithms
    Feng, Fan
    Ghorbani, Hamzeh
    Radwan, Ahmed E.
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 12
  • [38] Prediction of Water Level Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques
    Ayus, Ishan
    Natarajan, Narayanan
    Gupta, Deepak
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2023, 47 (04) : 2437 - 2447
  • [39] Prediction of Water Level Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques
    Ishan Ayus
    Narayanan Natarajan
    Deepak Gupta
    Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2023, 47 : 2437 - 2447
  • [40] Groundwater Level Prediction Using Machine Learning and Geostatistical Interpolation Models
    Zowam, Fabian J.
    Milewski, Adam M.
    WATER, 2024, 16 (19)