Prediction of groundwater level variations using deep learning methods and GMS numerical model

被引:21
|
作者
Amiri, Siamak [1 ]
Rajabi, Ahmad [1 ]
Shabanlou, Saeid [1 ]
Yosefvand, Fariborz [1 ]
Izadbakhsh, Mohammad Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Water Engn, Kermanshah Branch, Kermanshah, Iran
关键词
GWL prediction; GMS; Hybrid Models; LSTM; LS-SVM; ORELM; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SURFACE-WATER; MACHINE; RESOURCES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s12145-023-01052-1
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
One of the key elements of the hydrogeological cycle and a variable used by many water resource operating models is the variation in groundwater level (GWL). One of the biggest obstacles to the drawdown analysis and GWL forecasts is the absence of accurate and complete data. The application of diverse numerical models has been regarded as a reliable approach in recent years. Such models are able to determine the GWL for any given region by utilising a wide variety of statistics, data, and field measurements such as pumping experiments, geophysics, soil and land use maps, topography and slope data, a plethora of boundary conditions, and the application of complex equations. Artificial intelligence-based models need significantly less information. The purpose of this research is to predict the changes of GWL of Shazand plain by using the PSO-ANN, ACA-ANN hybrid methods and deep learning methods LSTM, LS-SVM, and ORELM and comparing with GMS numerical model. The model's accuracy is evaluated using a two-stage validation and verification process. Then Taylor's diagram was used to select the best model. Results show that ORELM with R, Nash, RMSE and NRMSE values equal to 0.977, 0.955, 0.512 and 0.058 respectively was the best performance in the test stage. After that is the PSO-ANN model. Using the Taylor diagram is another certain way to guarantee that you've picked the best possible model. The research results show that there is a link between the ORELM and the place that is most central to the reference point. Since the GMS model is complex and requires a large amount of data and a time-consuming calibration and validation process, the ORELM model can be utilised with certainty to predict the GWL across the entire plain. This research suggests that instead of using numerical models with a complex and time-consuming structure, deep learning methods with the least required data and with high accuracy should be used to forecast the groundwater level.
引用
收藏
页码:3227 / 3241
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CLASSIFYING AND MAPPING GROUNDWATER LEVEL VARIATIONS USING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS
    Yu, Su Min
    Seo, Jae Young
    Kim, Bo Ram
    Lee, Sang-Il
    IGARSS 2023 - 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2023, : 3755 - 3757
  • [22] Deep Learning for Stock Prediction Using Numerical and Information
    Akita, Ryo
    Yoshihara, Akira
    Matsubara, Takashi
    Uehara, Kuniaki
    2016 IEEE/ACIS 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCE (ICIS), 2016, : 945 - 950
  • [23] A Deep Learning Algorithm for Groundwater Level Prediction based on Spatialtemporal Attention Mechanism
    Chen, Chong
    Zhu, Xiaoyu
    Kang, Xiaobin
    Zhou, Han
    2021 IEEE INTL CONF ON DEPENDABLE, AUTONOMIC AND SECURE COMPUTING, INTL CONF ON PERVASIVE INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING, INTL CONF ON CLOUD AND BIG DATA COMPUTING, INTL CONF ON CYBER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CONGRESS DASC/PICOM/CBDCOM/CYBERSCITECH 2021, 2021, : 716 - 723
  • [24] A hybrid groundwater level prediction model using signal decomposition and optimised extreme learning machine
    Seidu, Jamel
    Ewusi, Anthony
    Kuma, Jerry Samuel Yaw
    Ziggah, Yao Yevenyo
    Voigt, Hans-Jurgen
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 8 (03) : 3607 - 3624
  • [25] Prediction of groundwater level using the hybrid model combining wavelet transform and machine learning algorithms
    Wei, Aihua
    Chen, Yuanyao
    Li, Duo
    Zhang, Xianfu
    Wu, Tao
    Li, Hui
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2022, 15 (03) : 1951 - 1962
  • [26] A hybrid groundwater level prediction model using signal decomposition and optimised extreme learning machine
    Jamel Seidu
    Anthony Ewusi
    Jerry Samuel Yaw Kuma
    Yao Yevenyo Ziggah
    Hans-Jurgen Voigt
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2022, 8 : 3607 - 3624
  • [27] Prediction of groundwater level using the hybrid model combining wavelet transform and machine learning algorithms
    Aihua Wei
    Yuanyao Chen
    Duo Li
    Xianfu Zhang
    Tao Wu
    Hui Li
    Earth Science Informatics, 2022, 15 : 1951 - 1962
  • [28] Applying Transfer Learning to Improve the Performance of Deep Learning-based Groundwater Level Prediction Model with Insufficient Training Data
    Jeong, Jiho
    Jeong, Jina
    ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2024, 57 (05): : 551 - 562
  • [29] Retrieval term prediction using deep learning methods
    Ma, Qing
    Tanigawa, Ibuki
    Murata, Masaki
    Proceedings of the 30th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, PACLIC 2016, 2016, : 309 - 317
  • [30] Prediction of Epidimic Outbreak using Deep Learning Methods
    Kiran, Chintala Ram Sai
    Naveen, Chinthoti
    Kumar, Digumarthi Anil
    Saiteja, Thotakura
    Karthikeyan, C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INVENTIVE COMPUTATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICICT 2021), 2021, : 995 - 1000