Image quality and radiation dose assessment for the clinically applied 16-slice CT scanner using PMMA phantom and quality assurance phantom

被引:0
|
作者
Mekonin, Tadelech Sisay [1 ]
Deressu, Tilahun Tesfaye [1 ]
机构
[1] Addis Ababa Univ, Dept Phys, POB 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
来源
关键词
Computed tomography scanner; Image quality parameter; CT dose index; Quality assurance phantom; PMMA phantom; Medical radiation dose; COEFFICIENTS; ATTENUATION;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-023-01038-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to assess the radiation dose delivered accuracy and the acceptable image quality parameter from the 16-slice Philips CT scanner in order to evaluate the current methodology for quality controls of computed tomography systems. The measured volume computed tomography dose index was 101 mGy and the displayed volume computed tomography dose index was 10.2 mGy and the dose length product is 680 mGy*cm for head scan, and the measured volume computed tomography dose index was 6.1 mGy and the displayed volume computed tomography dose index was 6.3 mGy and the dose length product was 587 mGy*cm for body scan, respectively. The image quality parameters were 4.4 HU, 2.3 HU, and 10 HU for uniformity, contrast-to-noise ratio, and computed tomography number accuracy (CT number accuracy) for quality assurance phantom, respectively. We propose that discussions and collaboration regarding patient and particular equipment adjustments be coordinated among radiologists, medical imaging technologists, and medical physicists. This can increase image quality, reduce absorbed radiation, and improve hospital medical care.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Image quality and radiation dose assessment for the clinically applied 16-slice CT scanner using PMMA phantom and quality assurance phantom
    Tadelech Sisay Mekonin
    Tilahun Tesfaye Deressu
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 54
  • [2] Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 16-slice CT scanner
    Flohr, T
    Stierstorfer, K
    Bruder, H
    Simon, J
    Polacin, A
    Schaller, S
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (05) : 832 - 845
  • [3] A motion phantom system for image quality assessment of a 64-slice volume CT scanner
    So, J.
    Nickoloff, E.
    Lu, Z.
    Dutta, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2339 - 2339
  • [4] Image quality assessment of clinically-applied CBCT protocols using a QAT phantom
    Elkhateeb, Sara M.
    Torgersen, Gerald R.
    Arnout, Eman A.
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (05)
  • [5] Relationships of clinical protocols and reconstruction kernels with image quality and radiation dose in a 128-slice CT scanner: Study with an anthropomorphic and water phantom
    Paul, Jijo
    Krauss, B.
    Banckwitz, R.
    Maentele, W.
    Bauer, R. W.
    Vogl, T. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (05) : E699 - E703
  • [6] Infant Cardiac CT Angiography with 64-Slice and 256-Slice CT: Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality Using a Pediatric Phantom
    Lee, Yi-Wei
    Yang, Ching-Ching
    Mok, Greta S. P.
    Wu, Tung-Hsin
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (11):
  • [7] DEVELOPMENT OF A PHANTOM FOR EVALUATION AND ASSURANCE OF IMAGE QUALITY IN CT SCANNING
    GOODENOUGH, DJ
    WEAVER, KE
    DAVIS, DO
    OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 1977, 16 (01) : 52 - 65
  • [8] Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose in adolescent thoracic imaging: 64-slice is preferable to 16-slice multislice CT
    Arthurs, O. J.
    Yates, S. J.
    Set, P. A. K.
    Gibbons, D. A.
    Dixon, A. K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 82 (974): : 157 - 161
  • [9] Image quality and dose optimisation for infant CT using a paediatric phantom
    Lambert, Jack W.
    Phelps, Andrew S.
    Courtier, Jesse L.
    Gould, Robert G.
    MacKenzie, John D.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (05) : 1387 - 1395
  • [10] Image quality and dose optimisation for infant CT using a paediatric phantom
    Jack W. Lambert
    Andrew S. Phelps
    Jesse L. Courtier
    Robert G. Gould
    John D. MacKenzie
    European Radiology, 2016, 26 : 1387 - 1395