Biomechanical properties of a novel cervical spine implant with elastic deformation: a cadaveric study

被引:1
|
作者
Abudouaini, Haimiti [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Tingkui [1 ]
Meng, Yang [1 ]
Ding, Chen [1 ]
Liu, Hao [1 ]
Beiyu, Wang [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Honghui Hosp, Dept Spine Surg, Xian, Peoples R China
关键词
cervical implant; biomechanics; elastically deformable; CAGE; artificial cervical disc; DISC REPLACEMENT; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; DYNAMIC STABILIZATION; LUMBAR SPINE; IN-VITRO; PRESSURE; FUSION; ARTHROPLASTY; PREVALENCE; DISKECTOMY;
D O I
10.3389/fbioe.2023.1214877
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a most frequently used surgical procedure for treating cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. However, there is concern about the high adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) rate after ACDF surgery. We creatively designed an elastically deformable cervical implant to reduce the postoperative stress concentration. In this study, we aimed to investigate the biomechanical performance of this novel cervical implant and compare it with the commonly used cervical devices.Methods: Biomechanical test was conducted on twelve fresh-frozen human cadaveric cervical spines (C2-C7) and randomly divided into four groups according to implant types: intact group, Zero-P VA fusion (ACDF) group, the novel cervical implant group and Pretic-I artificial cervical disc (ACDR) group. An optical tracking system was used to evaluate the segmental range of motion (ROM) of the C4/C5, C5/C6, and C6/C7 segments and micro pressure sensor was used to record the maximum facet joint pressure (FJP), maximum intradiscal pressure (IDP) at the C4-5 and C6-7 segments.Results: There were no significant differences in the ROM of adjacent segments between the groups. Compared with the intact group, the ACDR group essentially retained the ROM of the operated segment. The novel cervical implant decrease some ROM of the operated segment, but it was still significantly higher than in the fusion group; The maximum FJP and IDP at the adjacent segments in the ACDF group were significantly higher than those values in the other groups, and there were no differences in the other groups.Conclusion: While the newly developed elastically deformable cervical implant does not completely maintain ROM like the artificial cervical disc, it surpasses the fusion device with regards to biomechanical attributes. After further refinement, this novel implant may be suitable for patients who are prone to severe adjacent segment degeneration after fusion surgery but no indication for artificial cervical disc surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Harvesting and preparation of cadaveric osseoligamentous lower cervical spine (C2-C7) for biomechanical testing
    Yeh J.
    Jackowski A.
    European Spine Journal, 1998, 7 (1) : 66 - 68
  • [32] A biomechanical comparison of 360° stabilizations for corpectomy and total spondylectomy: a cadaveric study in the thoracolumbar spine
    Kim, Jung-Hoon
    Rhee, John M.
    Enyo, Yoshio
    Hutton, William C.
    Kim, Sung-Soo
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10
  • [33] A biomechanical comparison of 360° stabilizations for corpectomy and total spondylectomy: a cadaveric study in the thoracolumbar spine
    Jung-Hoon Kim
    John M. Rhee
    Yoshio Enyo
    William C. Hutton
    Sung-Soo Kim
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 10
  • [34] A Biomechanical Stability Study of Extraforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion on the Cadaveric Lumbar Spine Specimens
    Guo, Song
    Zeng, Cheng
    Yan, Meijun
    Han, Yingchao
    Xia, Dongdong
    Sun, Guixin
    Li, Lijun
    Yang, Mingjie
    Tan, Jun
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [35] Biomechanical function of a balloon nucleus pulposus replacement system: A human cadaveric spine study
    Lee, Taekyeong
    Lim, Tae-Hong
    Lee, Sang-Heon
    Kim, Joo-Han
    Hong, Junghwa
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2018, 36 (01) : 167 - 173
  • [36] BIOMECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION (FINGERPRINTING) OF 5 NOVEL METHODS OF CERVICAL-SPINE MANIPULATION
    KAWCHUK, GN
    HERZOG, W
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1993, 16 (09) : 573 - 577
  • [37] Biomechanical study of pediatric human cervical spine: A finite element approach
    Kumaresan, S
    Yoganandan, N
    Pintar, FA
    Maiman, DJ
    Kuppa, S
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2000, 122 (01): : 60 - 71
  • [38] BIOMECHANICAL STUDY OF THE CERVICAL SPINE WITH DISC IMPLANTS: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
    Szkoda, K.
    Galaska, P.
    Zak, M.
    Pezowicz, C.
    ENGINEERING MECHANICS 2017, 2017, : 966 - 969
  • [39] Biomechanical Experimental Study on Pressure Variety of Zagypophyseal Joint of Cervical Spine
    Shi Guantong
    Sun Bo
    Hong Shuizhong
    et al Shuguang hospital
    Shanghai College of T.C.M
    中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2000, (05) : 7 - 10
  • [40] Cervical spine instability following axial compression injury: A biomechanical study
    Ivancic, P. C.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2014, 100 (01) : 127 - 133