BIOMECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION (FINGERPRINTING) OF 5 NOVEL METHODS OF CERVICAL-SPINE MANIPULATION

被引:1
|
作者
KAWCHUK, GN [1 ]
HERZOG, W [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALGARY,DIV PHYS EDUC,BIOMECH LAB,CALGARY T2N 1N4,ALBERTA,CANADA
关键词
BIOMECHANICS; FORCE; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; MANIPULATION; CHIROPRACTIC;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To determine the biomechanical characteristics of five clinically common methods of cervical spine manipulation. Design: Descriptive study. Setting: Human Performance Lab, University of Calgary. Participants: Five volunteer practitioners treating symptomatic patients from their own clinical populations. Intervention: Five commonly used methods of cervical spine manipulation: lateral break (LAT), Gonstead (GON), Activator (ACT), toggle (TOG), rotation (ROT). Main Outcome Measure: Mean thrust duration (msec), normalized mean peak force (N), slope (N/ msec), force profile (graphic representation of the above values. Results: Outcome measures for each manipulative technique were as follows: LAT = normalized mean peak force of 102.2 N at 86.7 msec, GON = 109.8 N at 91.9 msec, ACT = 40.9 N at 31.8 msec, TOG = 117.6 N at 47.5 msec, ROT = 40.5 N at 79.1 msec. Conclusion: The observed differences and similarities in force profiles between the five techniques studied here may partly be the manifestation of how a particular technique delivers force to the cervical spine. The clinical significance of force profile characterization is not yet known.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 577
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF DECOMPRESSION AND RECONSTRUCTION METHODS IN THE CERVICAL-SPINE
    SHONO, Y
    MCAFEE, PC
    CUNNINGHAM, BW
    BRANTIGAN, JW
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (11): : 1674 - 1684
  • [2] BIOMECHANICAL INFLUENCE OF TRACTION ON CERVICAL-SPINE
    GOLDIE, IF
    REICHMANN, S
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 1977, 9 (01): : 31 - 34
  • [3] BIOMECHANICAL ASPECTS OF CERVICAL-SPINE INJURIES
    WALZ, F
    ORTHOPADE, 1994, 23 (04): : 262 - 267
  • [4] MANIPULATION UNDER ANESTHESIA OF CERVICAL-SPINE
    MAXWELL, CM
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1980, 62 (02): : 265 - 265
  • [5] MYELOPATHY FOLLOWING CERVICAL-SPINE MANIPULATION
    KEWALRAMANI, LS
    ORTH, MS
    KEWALRAMANI, DL
    KREBS, M
    SALEEM, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1982, 61 (04) : 165 - 175
  • [6] BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF CERVICAL-SPINE STABILIZATION METHODS USING A PORCINE MODEL
    RICHAMN, JD
    DANIEL, TE
    ANDERSON, DD
    MILLER, PL
    DOUGLAS, RA
    SPINE, 1995, 20 (20) : 2192 - 2197
  • [7] MODELING OF THE HEAD AND CERVICAL-SPINE IN BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS
    LABAR, J
    MUFTIC, O
    COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 1990, 14 (01) : 123 - 132
  • [8] BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF ANTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION FOR THE CERVICAL-SPINE
    GRIFFITH, SL
    ZOGBI, SW
    GUYER, RD
    SHELOKOV, AP
    CONTILIANO, JH
    GEIGER, JM
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1995, 8 (06): : 429 - 438
  • [9] BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF THE EXTENSOR MUSCULATURE OF THE CERVICAL-SPINE
    NOLAN, JP
    SHERK, HH
    SPINE, 1988, 13 (01) : 9 - 11
  • [10] COMPRESSION INJURIES OF THE CERVICAL-SPINE - A BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS
    MAIMAN, DJ
    SANCES, A
    MYKLEBUST, JB
    LARSON, SJ
    HOUTERMAN, C
    CHILBERT, M
    ELGHATIT, AZ
    NEUROSURGERY, 1983, 13 (03) : 254 - 260