Small-sized versus standard magnetic capsule endoscopy in adults: a two-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial

被引:6
|
作者
Jiang, Xi [1 ]
Qiu, Xiao-Ou [1 ]
Li, Zhen [2 ]
Pan, Jun [1 ]
Peng, Cheng [2 ]
Zuo, Xiu-Li [2 ]
Liao, Zhuan [1 ]
Li, Zhao-Shen [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Digest Dis, Dept Gastroenterol, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Qilu Hosp, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
GASTROSCOPY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1055/a-1881-4369
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Certain patients experience difficulty swallowing a video capsule endoscopy (VCE) device owing to its relatively large size. The newly developed small-sized magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) device is the smallest VCE device ever reported. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the small-sized MCE device in terms of ingestion and examination efficacy. Methods Patients in two centers were prospectively enrolled and randomized to the small-sized or standard MCE groups. Differences in capsule ingestion difficulties, visualization of the gastrointestinal tract, and capsule transit times were compared. Results 96 patients were enrolled (48 in each group). In the small-sized MCE group, the mean (SD) difficulty score and time to swallow the capsule, and success rate for swallowing the capsule at the first attempt were 0.6 (1.0), 3.4 (1.3) seconds, and 89.6%, which was significant better compared with the standard MCE group with 3.1 (1.7), 12.0 (14.3) seconds and 60.4%, respectively (all P<0.001). Visualization of the esophagus, stomach, and small bowel were comparable between the two groups. The small-sized MCE group had a significantly shorter gastric transit time (49.4 minutes vs. 66.2 minutes; P = 0.04) and longer small-bowel transit time (5.8 hours vs. 5.0 hours; P = 0.045). Conclusions The small-sized MCE device is feasible and safe for gastrointestinal examination, alleviating difficulties in capsule ingestion, improving gastric emptying under magnetic control, and prolonging the small-bowel transit time.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 57
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil sedation during awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Rong Hu
    J. X. Liu
    Hong Jiang
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2013, 27 : 211 - 217
  • [32] A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of coblation versus conventional dissection tonsillectomy on post-operative symptoms
    Philpott, CM
    Wild, DC
    Mehta, D
    Daniel, M
    Banerjee, AR
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2005, 30 (02): : 143 - 148
  • [33] Efficacy and Safety of Sahastara Remedy Extract Capsule in Primary Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Double-Blinded Active-Controlled Trial
    Kakatum, Narin
    Pinsornsak, Piya
    Kanokkangsadal, Puritat
    Ooraikul, Buncha
    Itharat, Arunporn
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 2021
  • [34] Bailing Capsule combined with α-ketoacid tablets for stage 3 chronic kidney disease Protocol of a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial
    Hu, Xiuhong
    Wang, Jing
    Yang, Hongjuan
    Ji, Suhua
    Li, Yuhong
    Xu, Baozhen
    Cui, Hongrui
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (20) : E25759
  • [35] The Efficacy and Safety of Zaoren Anshen Capsule in Combination with Zolpidem for Insomnia: A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Zhu, Xiangzhen
    Tao, Ming
    Hu, Haoyu
    Gao, Jingfang
    Chen, Jiong
    Lu, Tiaotiao
    Wang, Xiaole
    Kong, Wei
    Lv, Lijun
    Wei, Minjun
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 2022
  • [36] Initial diagnostic yield of wireless capsule endoscopy in a randomized controlled trial of wireless capsule endoscopy versus standard care for obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding
    Heitman, Steven J.
    Manns, Braden J.
    Pontifex, Darlene
    Hershfield, Noel B.
    Kaplan, Gilaad G.
    Hilsden, Robert J.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 134 (04) : A340 - A340
  • [37] Efficacy and safety of ecabet sodium on functional dyspepsia:A prospective,double-blinded,randomized,multi-center controlled trial
    Jun Haeng Lee
    Jae J Kim
    Ki-Baik Hahm
    Dong Ho Lee
    Nayoung Kim
    Sung Kook Kim
    Jong Jae Park
    Seok Reyol Choi
    Jong Hun Lee
    Soo Teik Lee
    Eun Hyun Lee
    Jong Chul Rhee
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2006, (17) : 2756 - 2761
  • [38] Efficacy and safety of ecabet sodium on functional dyspepsia: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, multi-center controlled trial
    Lee, Jun Haeng
    Kim, Jae J.
    Hahm, Ki-Baik
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Kim, Nayoung
    Kim, Sung Kook
    Park, Jong Jae
    Choi, Seok Reyol
    Lee, Jong Hun
    Lee, Soo Teik
    Lee, Eun Hyun
    Rhee, Jong Chul
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 12 (17) : 2756 - 2761
  • [39] A two-center randomized controlled trial of water-aided colonoscopy versus air insufflation colonoscopy
    Cadoni, Sergio
    Gallittu, Paolo
    Sanna, Stefano
    Fanari, Viviana
    Porcedda, Maria L.
    Erriu, Matteo
    Leung, Felix W.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 46 (03) : 212 - 218
  • [40] Two-center prospective randomized controlled trial of Blake versus Portex drains after cardiac surgery
    Roberts, Neil
    Boehm, Maria
    Bates, Madeline
    Braidley, Peter C.
    Cooper, Graham J.
    Spyt, Tom J.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 132 (05): : 1042 - 1046