Small-sized versus standard magnetic capsule endoscopy in adults: a two-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial

被引:6
|
作者
Jiang, Xi [1 ]
Qiu, Xiao-Ou [1 ]
Li, Zhen [2 ]
Pan, Jun [1 ]
Peng, Cheng [2 ]
Zuo, Xiu-Li [2 ]
Liao, Zhuan [1 ]
Li, Zhao-Shen [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Digest Dis, Dept Gastroenterol, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Qilu Hosp, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
GASTROSCOPY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1055/a-1881-4369
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Certain patients experience difficulty swallowing a video capsule endoscopy (VCE) device owing to its relatively large size. The newly developed small-sized magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) device is the smallest VCE device ever reported. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the small-sized MCE device in terms of ingestion and examination efficacy. Methods Patients in two centers were prospectively enrolled and randomized to the small-sized or standard MCE groups. Differences in capsule ingestion difficulties, visualization of the gastrointestinal tract, and capsule transit times were compared. Results 96 patients were enrolled (48 in each group). In the small-sized MCE group, the mean (SD) difficulty score and time to swallow the capsule, and success rate for swallowing the capsule at the first attempt were 0.6 (1.0), 3.4 (1.3) seconds, and 89.6%, which was significant better compared with the standard MCE group with 3.1 (1.7), 12.0 (14.3) seconds and 60.4%, respectively (all P<0.001). Visualization of the esophagus, stomach, and small bowel were comparable between the two groups. The small-sized MCE group had a significantly shorter gastric transit time (49.4 minutes vs. 66.2 minutes; P = 0.04) and longer small-bowel transit time (5.8 hours vs. 5.0 hours; P = 0.045). Conclusions The small-sized MCE device is feasible and safe for gastrointestinal examination, alleviating difficulties in capsule ingestion, improving gastric emptying under magnetic control, and prolonging the small-bowel transit time.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 57
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High versus low dose oxytocin in lean and obese women: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Wei, Ruth
    Bounthavong, Mark
    Hill, Meg
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S409 - S409
  • [22] Botulinum Toxin Type A Versus Placebo for Idiopathic Clubfoot A Two-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Alvarez, Christine M.
    Wright, James G.
    Chhina, Harpreet
    Howren, Alyssa
    Law, Peggy
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2018, 100 (18): : 1589 - 1596
  • [23] Effect of intravenous lidocaine on Ciprofol dose in patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial
    Cao, Xinyu
    Zhu, Guangli
    Yang, Chongya
    Wang, Bin
    Ang, Yang
    Hui, Kangli
    Xiong, Jingwei
    Zhou, Jiejie
    Sun, Qiang
    Duan, Manlin
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [24] Popliteal plexus block in total knee arthroplasty: a single-center randomized controlled double-blinded trial
    Stebler, Kevin
    Elia, Nadia
    Zaccaria, Isabelle
    Fournier, Roxane Michelle
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [25] Oral IBGard™ Before Colonoscopy: A Single-Center Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Han, James Y.
    Moosvi, Zain
    Duh, Erica
    Park, Sunhee
    Albers, Gregory C.
    Samarasena, Jason B.
    Karnes, William
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2021, 66 (05) : 1611 - 1619
  • [26] Oral IBGard™ Before Colonoscopy: A Single-Center Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    James Y. Han
    Zain Moosvi
    Erica Duh
    Sunhee Park
    Gregory C. Albers
    Jason B. Samarasena
    William Karnes
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2021, 66 : 1611 - 1619
  • [27] Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil sedation during awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Hu, Rong
    Liu, J. X.
    Jiang, Hong
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2013, 27 (02) : 211 - 217
  • [28] Sequential therapy versus quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Tabesh, Elham
    Yadmehr, Farzad
    Feizi, Awat
    Khorvash, Farzin
    Sindarreh, Setayesh
    Hakamifard, Atousa
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [29] Etomidate versus propofol sedation for complex upper endoscopic procedures: a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Kim, Mi Gang
    Park, Se Woo
    Kim, Jae Hyun
    Lee, Jin
    Kae, Sea Hyub
    Jang, Hyun Joo
    Koh, Dong Hee
    Choi, Min Ho
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 86 (03) : 452 - 461
  • [30] Double-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Medicated versus Nonmedicated Merocel Sponges for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
    Chang, Eun Hae
    Alandejani, Talal
    Akbari, Elaheh
    Ostry, Avi
    Javer, Amin
    JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2011, 40 : S14 - S19