Small-sized versus standard magnetic capsule endoscopy in adults: a two-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial

被引:6
|
作者
Jiang, Xi [1 ]
Qiu, Xiao-Ou [1 ]
Li, Zhen [2 ]
Pan, Jun [1 ]
Peng, Cheng [2 ]
Zuo, Xiu-Li [2 ]
Liao, Zhuan [1 ]
Li, Zhao-Shen [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Digest Dis, Dept Gastroenterol, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Qilu Hosp, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
GASTROSCOPY; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1055/a-1881-4369
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Certain patients experience difficulty swallowing a video capsule endoscopy (VCE) device owing to its relatively large size. The newly developed small-sized magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) device is the smallest VCE device ever reported. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the small-sized MCE device in terms of ingestion and examination efficacy. Methods Patients in two centers were prospectively enrolled and randomized to the small-sized or standard MCE groups. Differences in capsule ingestion difficulties, visualization of the gastrointestinal tract, and capsule transit times were compared. Results 96 patients were enrolled (48 in each group). In the small-sized MCE group, the mean (SD) difficulty score and time to swallow the capsule, and success rate for swallowing the capsule at the first attempt were 0.6 (1.0), 3.4 (1.3) seconds, and 89.6%, which was significant better compared with the standard MCE group with 3.1 (1.7), 12.0 (14.3) seconds and 60.4%, respectively (all P<0.001). Visualization of the esophagus, stomach, and small bowel were comparable between the two groups. The small-sized MCE group had a significantly shorter gastric transit time (49.4 minutes vs. 66.2 minutes; P = 0.04) and longer small-bowel transit time (5.8 hours vs. 5.0 hours; P = 0.045). Conclusions The small-sized MCE device is feasible and safe for gastrointestinal examination, alleviating difficulties in capsule ingestion, improving gastric emptying under magnetic control, and prolonging the small-bowel transit time.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 57
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PEAK PlasmaBlade versus monopolar electrocautery tonsillectomy in adults: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Tan, Alvin
    Ganhasan, Sanjay
    Lu, Peter
    Yuen, Heng Wai
    Loh, Ian
    Chan, Yiong Huak
    Hsu, Pon Poh
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 40 (04) : 478 - 481
  • [2] Anterior Rectus Sheath versus Standard Gibson Approach to Kidney Transplantation: A Randomized Double-blinded Controlled Trial
    Murthy, P.
    Lyon, M.
    Fascelli, M.
    Spinner, M.
    Miller, E.
    Lin, Y.
    Goldfarb, D.
    Krishnamurthi, V.
    Wee, A.
    Eltemamy, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 : 714 - 714
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of Xinfeng capsule in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial
    Liu Jian
    Wang Yuan
    Sun Yue
    Huang Chuanbing
    Chen Xi
    Zhang Wandong
    He Liyun
    Wei, James Cheng-Chung
    JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE, 2020, 40 (02) : 284 - 295
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of Xinfeng capsule in the treatment of osteoarthritis:a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial
    Liu Jian
    Wang Yuan
    Sun Yue
    Huang Chuanbing
    Chen Xi
    Zhang Wandong
    He Liyun
    James Cheng-Chung Wei
    Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2020, 40 (02) : 284 - 295
  • [5] Diagnostic Tool Using the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Randomized Crossover-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Two-Center Study
    Young, Andrew
    Gallia, Samantha
    Ryan, John F.
    Kamimoto, Atsushi
    Korczeniewska, Olga A.
    Kalladka, Mythili
    Khan, Junad
    Noma, Noboru
    JOURNAL OF ORAL & FACIAL PAIN AND HEADACHE, 2021, 35 (03) : 241 - 252
  • [6] Digital versus conventional complete dentures: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded crossover trial
    Peroz, Simon
    Peroz, Ingrid
    Beuer, Florian
    von Stein-Lausnitz, Manja
    Sterzenbach, Guido
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 132 (01): : 132 - 138
  • [7] Magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy vs. gastroscopy for gastric diseases: a two-center self-controlled comparative trial
    Zou, Wen-Bin
    Hou, Xiao-Hua
    Xin, Lei
    Liu, Jun
    Bo, Lu-Min
    Yu, Guan-Yu
    Liao, Zhuan
    Li, Zhao-Shen
    ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 47 (06) : 526 - 529
  • [8] Premedication of atropine benefits sedated screening gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial
    Wang, Xiaocou
    Li, Yong
    Zhao, Yaxin
    Li, Husong
    Yang, Zhuqing
    Xu, Ximou
    Lian, Qingquan
    Zeng, Ruifeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (02): : 1270 - 1277
  • [9] Warmed, humidified carbon dioxide insufflation versus standard carbon dioxide in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Bettina Klugsberger
    Markus Schreiner
    Alexander Rothe
    Dietmar Haas
    Peter Oppelt
    Andreas Shamiyeh
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 2656 - 2660
  • [10] Warmed, humidified carbon dioxide insufflation versus standard carbon dioxide in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Klugsberger, Bettina
    Schreiner, Markus
    Rothe, Alexander
    Haas, Dietmar
    Oppelt, Peter
    Shamiyeh, Andreas
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (09): : 2656 - 2660