Denoising diffusion-based MRI to CT image translation enables automated spinal segmentation

被引:1
|
作者
Graf, Robert [1 ]
Schmitt, Joachim [1 ]
Schlaeger, Sarah [1 ]
Moeller, Hendrik Kristian
Sideri-Lampretsa, Vasiliki [2 ]
Sekuboyina, Anjany [1 ,3 ]
Krieg, Sandro Manuel [4 ]
Wiestler, Benedikt [1 ]
Menze, Bjoern [3 ]
Rueckert, Daniel [2 ,5 ]
Kirschke, Jan Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Neuroradiol, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Inst KI &Informat Med, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Zurich, Dept Quant Biomed, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[5] Imperial Coll London, Visual Informat Proc, Dept Comp, London, England
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Deep learning; Image processing (computer assisted); Magnetic resonance imaging; Spine; Vertebral body;
D O I
10.1186/s41747-023-00385-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundAutomated segmentation of spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a vital role both scientifically and clinically. However, accurately delineating posterior spine structures is challenging.MethodsThis retrospective study, approved by the ethical committee, involved translating T1-weighted and T2-weighted images into computed tomography (CT) images in a total of 263 pairs of CT/MR series. Landmark-based registration was performed to align image pairs. We compared two-dimensional (2D) paired - Pix2Pix, denoising diffusion implicit models (DDIM) image mode, DDIM noise mode - and unpaired (SynDiff, contrastive unpaired translation) image-to-image translation using "peak signal-to-noise ratio" as quality measure. A publicly available segmentation network segmented the synthesized CT datasets, and Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) were evaluated on in-house test sets and the "MRSpineSeg Challenge" volumes. The 2D findings were extended to three-dimensional (3D) Pix2Pix and DDIM.Results2D paired methods and SynDiff exhibited similar translation performance and DCS on paired data. DDIM image mode achieved the highest image quality. SynDiff, Pix2Pix, and DDIM image mode demonstrated similar DSC (0.77). For craniocaudal axis rotations, at least two landmarks per vertebra were required for registration. The 3D translation outperformed the 2D approach, resulting in improved DSC (0.80) and anatomically accurate segmentations with higher spatial resolution than that of the original MRI series.ConclusionsTwo landmarks per vertebra registration enabled paired image-to-image translation from MRI to CT and outperformed all unpaired approaches. The 3D techniques provided anatomically correct segmentations, avoiding underprediction of small structures like the spinous process.Relevance statementThis study addresses the unresolved issue of translating spinal MRI to CT, making CT-based tools usable for MRI data. It generates whole spine segmentation, previously unavailable in MRI, a prerequisite for biomechanical modeling and feature extraction for clinical applications.Key points center dot Unpaired image translation lacks in converting spine MRI to CT effectively.center dot Paired translation needs registration with two landmarks per vertebra at least.center dot Paired image-to-image enables segmentation transfer to other domains.center dot 3D translation enables super resolution from MRI to CT.center dot 3D translation prevents underprediction of small structures.Key points center dot Unpaired image translation lacks in converting spine MRI to CT effectively.center dot Paired translation needs registration with two landmarks per vertebra at least.center dot Paired image-to-image enables segmentation transfer to other domains.center dot 3D translation enables super resolution from MRI to CT.center dot 3D translation prevents underprediction of small structures.Key points center dot Unpaired image translation lacks in converting spine MRI to CT effectively.center dot Paired translation needs registration with two landmarks per vertebra at least.center dot Paired image-to-image enables segmentation transfer to other domains.center dot 3D translation enables super resolution from MRI to CT.center dot 3D translation prevents underprediction of small structures.Key points center dot Unpaired image translation lacks in converting spine MRI to CT effectively.center dot Paired translation needs registration with two landmarks per vertebra at least.center dot Paired image-to-image enables segmentation transfer to other domains.center dot 3D translation enables super resolution from MRI to CT. center dot 3D translation prevents underprediction of small structures.Key points center dot Unpaired image translation lacks in converting spine MRI to CT effectively.center dot Paired translation needs registration with two landmarks per vertebra at least.center dot Paired image-to-image enables segmentation transfer to other domains.center dot 3D translation enables super resolution from MRI to CT.center dot 3D translation prevents underprediction of small structures.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Denoising diffusion-based MRI to CT image translation enables automated spinal segmentation
    Robert Graf
    Joachim Schmitt
    Sarah Schlaeger
    Hendrik Kristian Möller
    Vasiliki Sideri-Lampretsa
    Anjany Sekuboyina
    Sandro Manuel Krieg
    Benedikt Wiestler
    Bjoern Menze
    Daniel Rueckert
    Jan Stefan Kirschke
    [J]. European Radiology Experimental, 7
  • [2] A new diffusion-based variational model for image denoising and segmentation
    Li, Fang
    Shen, Chaomin
    Pi, Ling
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL IMAGING AND VISION, 2006, 26 (1-2) : 115 - 125
  • [3] A New Diffusion-Based Variational Model for Image Denoising and Segmentation
    Fang Li
    Chaomin Shen
    Ling Pi
    [J]. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2006, 26 : 115 - 125
  • [4] Diffusion-based Image Translation with Label Guidance for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentation
    Peng, Duo
    Hu, Ping
    Ke, Qiuhong
    Liu, Jun
    [J]. 2023 IEEE/CVF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION, ICCV, 2023, : 808 - 820
  • [5] Diffusion-based image denoising combining curvelet and wavelet
    Ashamol, V. G.
    Sreelekha, G.
    Sathidevi, P. S.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF IWSSIP 2008: 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, SIGNALS AND IMAGE PROCESSING, 2008, : 169 - 172
  • [6] Linear Hyperbolic Diffusion-Based Image Denoising Technique
    Barbu, Tudor
    [J]. NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, PT III, 2015, 9491 : 471 - 478
  • [7] Diffusion-Based Data Augmentation for Nuclei Image Segmentation
    Yu, Xinyi
    Li, Guanbin
    Lou, Wei
    Liu, Siqi
    Wan, Xiang
    Chen, Yan
    Li, Haofeng
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVENTION, MICCAI 2023, PT VIII, 2023, 14227 : 592 - 602
  • [8] Anisotropic Diffusion-based Denoising Using Residual image for Preservation of Image Details
    Bae, GyuJin
    Cho, Sung In
    Kim, Young Hwan
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL SOC DESIGN CONFERENCE (ISOCC), 2014, : 52 - 53
  • [9] Nonlinear Fourth-Order Diffusion-Based Model for Image Denoising
    Barbu, Tudor
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING APPLICATIONS, SOFA 2016, VOL 1, 2018, 633 : 423 - 429
  • [10] A NONLINEAR FOURTH-ORDER DIFFUSION-BASED MODEL FOR IMAGE DENOISING AND RESTORATION
    Barbu, Tudor
    Munteanu, Ionut
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY SERIES A-MATHEMATICS PHYSICS TECHNICAL SCIENCES INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2017, 18 (02): : 108 - 115