Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmacogenomics (PGx)-Based Warfarin, Apixaban, and Rivaroxaban Versus Standard Warfarin for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Ontario, Canada

被引:2
|
作者
Hafeez, Aneeka [1 ]
Cipriano, Lauren E. [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Richard B. [3 ,4 ]
Zaric, Gregory S. [1 ,2 ]
Schwarz, Ute I. [3 ,4 ]
Sarma, Sisira [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, ON, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Ivey Business Sch, London, ON, Canada
[3] Western Univ, Dept Med, Div Clin Pharmacol, London, ON, Canada
[4] Western Univ, Dept Physiol & Pharmacol, London, ON, Canada
[5] ICES Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS; ISCHEMIC-STROKE; SECONDARY PREVENTION; RISK-FACTORS; MORTALITY; THERAPY; EVENTS; RATES; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s40273-023-01309-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo assess the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics (PGx)-based warfarin (i.e., warfarin dosing following genetic testing), apixaban, and rivaroxaban oral anticoagulation versus standard warfarin for the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) aged & GE; 65 years.MethodsWe developed a Markov decision-analytic model to compare costs [2017 Canadian dollars (C$)] and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from the Ontario health care payer perspective over a life-time horizon. The parameters used in the model were derived from the published literature, the Ontario health care administrative database, and expert opinion. To account for the uncertainty of model parameters, we conducted extensive deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The results were summarized using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.ResultsWe found that PGx-based warfarin had an ICER of C$17,584/QALY compared with standard warfarin, and apixaban had an ICER of C$64,590/QALY compared with PGx-based warfarin in our base-case analysis. Rivaroxaban was extendedly dominated by PGx-based warfarin and apixaban. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that apixaban, rivaroxaban, PGx-based warfarin, and standard warfarin were cost-effective at some willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. PGx-based warfarin had a higher probability of being cost-effective than apixaban (51.3% versus 14.3%) at a WTP threshold of C$50,000/QALY. At a WTP threshold of C$100,000/QALY, apixaban had a higher probability of being cost-effective than PGx-based warfarin (54.6% versus 22.6%).ConclusionWe found that PGx-based warfarin for patients with AF is cost-effective at a WTP threshold of C$50,000/QALY. Apixaban had a higher probability of being cost-effective (> 50%) at a WTP threshold of C$93,000/QALY.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 90
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation
    Hernandez, Inmaculada
    Zhang, Yuting
    Saba, Samir
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 120 (10): : 1813 - 1819
  • [42] COST EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION OF APIXABAN, DABIGATRAN RIVAROXABAN AND WARFARIN FOR PREVENTION OF TROMBOEMBOLISM IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
    Garita, M.
    Peralta, M.
    Dookie, T. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A116 - A117
  • [43] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmacogenomics-Guided Versus Standard Dosing of Warfarin in Patients with Mechanical Prosthetic
    Hemati, Homa
    Nosrati, Marzieh
    Hasanzad, Mandana
    Rahmani, Parham
    Fariman, Soroush
    Sarabi, Mohadese
    Shirvani, Sepideh
    Sadeghipour, Parham
    Nikfar, Shekoufeh
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 23 (01):
  • [44] AN UPDATED COST-EFFECTIVENESS PAIRWISE ANALYSIS OF APIXABAN AND WARFARIN FOR STROKE PREVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN FRANCE
    Lanitis, T.
    Bregman, B.
    Maunoury, F.
    Prawitz, T.
    Gaudin, A.
    Cotte, F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S105 - S105
  • [45] New anticoagulant drugs versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation: economic evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis
    Silingardi, Mauro
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 7 : 65 - 70
  • [46] Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the Japanese healthcare setting
    Hori, Masatsugu
    Tanahashi, Norio
    Akiyama, Sayako
    Kiyabu, Grace
    Dorey, Julie
    Goto, Rei
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (03) : 252 - 261
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with chronic kidney disease in China
    Liu, Lin
    Hong, Dongsheng
    Ma, Kuifen
    Lu, Xiaoyang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 46 (03) : 658 - 668
  • [48] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF RIVAROXABAN VERSUS WARFARIN FOR STROKE PREVENTION IN NON-VALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN THE JAPANESE HEALTHCARE SETTING
    Hori, M.
    Tanahashi, N.
    Akiyama, S.
    Kiyabu, G.
    Dorey, J.
    Goto, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S554 - S555
  • [49] Cost-Effectiveness of Apixaban Compared With Aspirin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Among Patients Unsuitable for Warfarin
    Lee, Soyon
    Anglade, Moise W.
    Meng, Joy
    Hagstrom, Kelly
    Kluger, Jeffrey
    Coleman, Craig I.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2012, 5 (04): : 472 - 479
  • [50] Cost Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin or Aspirin for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Greek Perspective
    Athanasakis, Kostas
    Boubouchairopoulou, Nadia
    Karampli, Eleftheria
    Tarantilis, Filippos
    Savvari, Paraskevi
    Bilitou, Aikaterini
    Kyriopoulos, John
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS, 2017, 17 (02) : 123 - 133