Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pharmacogenomics (PGx)-Based Warfarin, Apixaban, and Rivaroxaban Versus Standard Warfarin for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Ontario, Canada

被引:2
|
作者
Hafeez, Aneeka [1 ]
Cipriano, Lauren E. [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Richard B. [3 ,4 ]
Zaric, Gregory S. [1 ,2 ]
Schwarz, Ute I. [3 ,4 ]
Sarma, Sisira [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, ON, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Ivey Business Sch, London, ON, Canada
[3] Western Univ, Dept Med, Div Clin Pharmacol, London, ON, Canada
[4] Western Univ, Dept Physiol & Pharmacol, London, ON, Canada
[5] ICES Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS; ISCHEMIC-STROKE; SECONDARY PREVENTION; RISK-FACTORS; MORTALITY; THERAPY; EVENTS; RATES; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s40273-023-01309-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo assess the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics (PGx)-based warfarin (i.e., warfarin dosing following genetic testing), apixaban, and rivaroxaban oral anticoagulation versus standard warfarin for the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) aged & GE; 65 years.MethodsWe developed a Markov decision-analytic model to compare costs [2017 Canadian dollars (C$)] and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from the Ontario health care payer perspective over a life-time horizon. The parameters used in the model were derived from the published literature, the Ontario health care administrative database, and expert opinion. To account for the uncertainty of model parameters, we conducted extensive deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. The results were summarized using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.ResultsWe found that PGx-based warfarin had an ICER of C$17,584/QALY compared with standard warfarin, and apixaban had an ICER of C$64,590/QALY compared with PGx-based warfarin in our base-case analysis. Rivaroxaban was extendedly dominated by PGx-based warfarin and apixaban. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that apixaban, rivaroxaban, PGx-based warfarin, and standard warfarin were cost-effective at some willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. PGx-based warfarin had a higher probability of being cost-effective than apixaban (51.3% versus 14.3%) at a WTP threshold of C$50,000/QALY. At a WTP threshold of C$100,000/QALY, apixaban had a higher probability of being cost-effective than PGx-based warfarin (54.6% versus 22.6%).ConclusionWe found that PGx-based warfarin for patients with AF is cost-effective at a WTP threshold of C$50,000/QALY. Apixaban had a higher probability of being cost-effective (> 50%) at a WTP threshold of C$93,000/QALY.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 90
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Study of Cost-Effectiveness of Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Who Developed Ischemic Stroke
    Jaberi, Neda
    Kavosi, Zahra
    Hooshmandi, Etrat
    Moradi, Nasrin
    Keshavarz, Khosro
    Borhani-Haghighi, Afshin
    STROKE RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 2021
  • [32] Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in patients with worsening renal function
    Salcedo, Jonathan
    Hay, Joel W.
    Lam, Jenny
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 282 : 53 - 58
  • [33] Cost-effectiveness of apixaban and warfarin in the prevention of thromboembolic complications among atrial fibrillation patients
    Hallinen, Taru
    Soini, Erkki J.
    Linna, Miika
    Saarni, Samuli I.
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5
  • [34] Cost-effectiveness of Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban Compared with Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
    Wang, Ye
    Xie, Feng
    Kong, Ming Chai
    Lee, Lai Heng
    Ng, Heng Joo
    Ko, Yu
    CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 2014, 28 (06) : 575 - 585
  • [35] Cost-effectiveness of Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban Compared with Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
    Ye Wang
    Feng Xie
    Ming Chai Kong
    Lai Heng Lee
    Heng Joo Ng
    Yu Ko
    Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 2014, 28 : 575 - 585
  • [36] Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Apixaban against Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in Japan
    Kamae, Isao
    Hashimoto, Yoichiro
    Koretsune, Yukihiro
    Tanahashi, Norio
    Murata, Tatsunori
    Phatak, Hemant
    Liu, Larry Z.
    Tang, Ann C.
    Wang, Peter Feng
    Okumura, Ken
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 37 (12) : 2837 - 2851
  • [37] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF APIXABAN VERSUS OTHER NEW ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS AND WARFARIN FOR STROKE PREVENTION IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN VENEZUELA
    Fernandez Avila, Y.
    Garcia, K. C.
    Garrido Lecca, S.
    Donato, B. M.
    Juarez-Garcia, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A829 - A829
  • [38] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF RIVAROXABAN VERSUS WARFARIN FOR STROKE PREVENTION IN NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN THE GUANGDONG HEALTHCARE SETTING IN CHINA
    Zhou, J.
    Huang, B. Y.
    Yang, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A653 - A653
  • [39] EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF APIXABAN, DABIGATRAN AND RIVAROXABAN VERSUS WARFARIN IN OBESE PATIENTS WITH NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: ARISTOPHANES SUBGROUP ANALYSIS
    Deitelzweig, Steven
    Keshishian, Allison
    Kang, Amiee
    Dhamane, Amol
    Luo, Xuemei
    Li, Xiaoyan
    Balachander, Neeraja
    Rosenblatt, Lisa
    Mardekian, Jack
    Pan, Xianying
    Di Fusco, Manuela
    Garcia, Alessandra Bassalobre
    Yuce, Huseyin
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 435 - 435
  • [40] Comparing new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban) to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation, a cost-effectiveness analysis from a German payer perspective
    Krejczy, M.
    Wehling, M.
    Marx, S.
    Obermann, K.
    Harenberg, J.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2013, 11 : 256 - 257