LSTM-GARCH Hybrid Model for the Prediction of Volatility in Cryptocurrency Portfolios

被引:17
|
作者
Garcia-Medina, Andres [1 ,2 ]
Aguayo-Moreno, Ester [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Invest Matemat, Unidad Monterrey, Alianza Ctr 502, Apodaca 66628, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
[2] Consejo Nacl Ciencia & Technol, Insurgentes Sur 1582, Mexico City 03940, Mexico
关键词
Cryptocurrencies; GARCH-LSTM models; Volatility; CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY; ASSET RETURNS; VOLUME; BITCOIN; DOLLAR; GOLD;
D O I
10.1007/s10614-023-10373-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the present work, the volatility of the leading cryptocurrencies is predicted through generalised autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) models, multilayer perceptron (MLP), long short-term memory (LSTM), and hybrid models of the type LSTM and GARCH, where parameters of the GARCH family are included as features of LSTM models. The study period covered the scenario of the World Health Organization pandemic declaration around March 2020 at hourly frequency. We have found that the different variants of deep neural network models outperform those of the GARCH family in the sense of the hetorerocedastic error, and absolute and squared error (HSE). Under the sharpe ratio, the volatility forecasting of a uniform portfolio at long horizons systematically outperforms the stablecoin Tether, which is considered here as the risk-free asset. Also, including transaction volume helps reduce the value at risk or loss probability for the uniform portfolio. Moreover, in a minimum variance portfolio, it is observed that before the pandemic declaration, a large proportion of the capital was allocated to bitcoin (BTC). In contrast, after March 2020, the portfolio is more diversified with short positions for BTC. Moreover, the MLP models give the best predictive results, although not statistically different in accuracy compared to the LSTM and LSTM-GARCH versions under the Diebold-Mariano test. In sum, MLP models outperform most stylised financial models and are less computationally expensive than more complex neural networks. Therefore, simple learning models are suggested in highly non-linear time series volatility forecasts as it is the cryptocurrency market.
引用
收藏
页码:1511 / 1542
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The log GARCH stochastic volatility model
    Guerbyenne, Hafida
    Hamdi, Faycal
    Hamrat, Malika
    STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 2024, 214
  • [32] Asymmetric volatility in cryptocurrency markets: New evidence from smooth transition GARCH models
    Ben Cheikh, Nidhaleddine
    Ben Zaied, Younes
    Chevallier, Julien
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 35
  • [33] Implied volatility in black-scholes model with GARCH volatility
    Sheraz, Muhammad
    Preda, Vasile
    1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 'ECONOMIC SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH - THEORETICAL, EMPIRICAL AND PRACTICAL APPROACHES', ESPERA 2013, 2014, 8 : 658 - 663
  • [34] Predicting cryptocurrency volatility: The power of model clustering
    Qiu, Yue
    Qu, Shaoguang
    Shi, Zhentao
    Xie, Tian
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2025, 144
  • [35] Stacking hybrid GARCH models for forecasting Bitcoin volatility
    Aras, Serkan
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 174
  • [36] The Volatility and Density Prediction Performance of Alternative GARCH Models
    Huang, Teng-Hao
    Wang, Yaw-Huei
    JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2012, 31 (02) : 157 - 171
  • [37] Portfolios with return and volatility prediction for the energy stock market
    Ma, Yilin
    Wang, Yudong
    Wang, Weizhong
    Zhang, Chong
    ENERGY, 2023, 270
  • [38] A Hybrid Markov and LSTM Model for Indoor Location Prediction
    Wang, Peixiao
    Wang, Hongen
    Zhang, Hengcai
    Lu, Feng
    Wu, Sheng
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 185928 - 185940
  • [39] Multivariate LSTM for Stock Market Volatility Prediction
    Assaf, Osama
    Di Fatta, Giuseppe
    Nicosia, Giuseppe
    MACHINE LEARNING, OPTIMIZATION, AND DATA SCIENCE (LOD 2021), PT II, 2022, 13164 : 531 - 544
  • [40] Long- and Short-Term Cryptocurrency Volatility Components: A GARCH-MIDAS Analysis
    Conrad, Christian
    Custovic, Anessa
    Ghysels, Eric
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 11 (02):