Evaluation of architectural distortion with contrast-enhanced mammography

被引:1
|
作者
Goh, Y. [1 ]
Quek, S. T. [1 ]
Pillay, P. [1 ]
Chou, C. -P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Singapore
[2] Kaohsiung Vet Gen Hosp, Radiol Dept, 386,Dazhong 1st Rd, Kaohsiung 81362, Taiwan
关键词
BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; MRI; LIKELIHOOD; DIAGNOSIS; FOCUS; CESM; MASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2023.11.021
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Architectural distortion (AD) is the third most common abnormality detected on mammograms. In the absence of an accurate non-invasive tool to evaluate ADs, clinical management often requires surgical excision for histological diagnosis. This problem is expected to worsen with the growing use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and the resultant increasing detection of ADs. There is therefore a great clinical need for a diagnostic imaging tool to complement non -enhanced mammography for the evaluation of AD. Contrast -enhanced mammography (CEM) is an emerging breast imaging method that uses contrast media and the principle of dual -energy subtraction to evaluate vascularity of suspicious breast lesions. CEM, a cost-effective alternative to breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), can be used to evaluate AD by juxtaposing CEM images with non -enhanced mammograms for comparison. In this review, the authors aim to provide readers with an overview of the interpretation of AD on CEM using imaging examples. Relevant imaging features of CEM and their respective significance will be matched with information from a literature review. Finally, the authors would like to highlight the added value of CEM in relevant clinical applications in the assessment of AD. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 169
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Contrast-enhanced Mammography: How Does It Work?
    Sensakovic, William F.
    Carnahan, Molly B.
    Czaplicki, Christopher D.
    Fahrenholtz, Samuel
    Panda, Anshuman
    Zhou, Yuxiang
    Pavlicek, William
    Patel, Bhavika
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2021, 41 (03) : 829 - 839
  • [42] Detection of Primary Malignancy With Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Chen, Shao Zun
    Nguyen, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2023, 5 (01) : 96 - 98
  • [43] Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Successful Clinical Experience
    Woodroof, Andrea
    APPLIED RADIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (11)
  • [44] Contrast-enhanced mammography and tumour size assessment
    Mascarel, Anne-Margaux
    Movassaghi, Roshanack
    Neveu, Marine
    Vilcot, Laurence
    Geffroy, Delphine
    Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2023, 33 (03) : 164 - 167
  • [45] Dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography
    Travieso Aja, M. M.
    Rodriguez Rodriguez, M.
    Mayon Hernandez, S.
    Vega Benitez, V.
    Luzardo, O. P.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2014, 56 (05): : 390 - 399
  • [46] Quantitative Breast Density in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Gennaro, Gisella
    Hill, Melissa L.
    Bezzon, Elisabetta
    Caumo, Francesca
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (15)
  • [47] State-of-the-art for contrast-enhanced mammography
    Covington, Matthew F.
    Salmon, Samantha
    Weaver, Bradley D.
    Fajardo, Laurie L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 97 (1156): : 695 - 704
  • [48] Structured reports for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography
    Alvarez Sanchez, C.
    Arizaga Ramirez, M. C.
    Montes Fernandez, M.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2022, 64 : 98 - 105
  • [49] Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Breast Imaging
    Lancaster, Rachael B.
    Gulla, Shannon
    De Los Santos, Jennifer
    Umphrey, Heidi R.
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 53 (04) : 294 - 300
  • [50] Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening
    Coffey, Kristen
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 156