Evaluation of architectural distortion with contrast-enhanced mammography

被引:1
|
作者
Goh, Y. [1 ]
Quek, S. T. [1 ]
Pillay, P. [1 ]
Chou, C. -P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Singapore
[2] Kaohsiung Vet Gen Hosp, Radiol Dept, 386,Dazhong 1st Rd, Kaohsiung 81362, Taiwan
关键词
BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; MRI; LIKELIHOOD; DIAGNOSIS; FOCUS; CESM; MASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2023.11.021
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Architectural distortion (AD) is the third most common abnormality detected on mammograms. In the absence of an accurate non-invasive tool to evaluate ADs, clinical management often requires surgical excision for histological diagnosis. This problem is expected to worsen with the growing use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and the resultant increasing detection of ADs. There is therefore a great clinical need for a diagnostic imaging tool to complement non -enhanced mammography for the evaluation of AD. Contrast -enhanced mammography (CEM) is an emerging breast imaging method that uses contrast media and the principle of dual -energy subtraction to evaluate vascularity of suspicious breast lesions. CEM, a cost-effective alternative to breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), can be used to evaluate AD by juxtaposing CEM images with non -enhanced mammograms for comparison. In this review, the authors aim to provide readers with an overview of the interpretation of AD on CEM using imaging examples. Relevant imaging features of CEM and their respective significance will be matched with information from a literature review. Finally, the authors would like to highlight the added value of CEM in relevant clinical applications in the assessment of AD. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 169
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contrast-enhanced mammography: Technical considerations
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Arfi-Rouche, Julia
    Loshkajian, Ara
    Ceugnart, Luc
    Doutriaux-Dumoulin, Isabelle
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2023, 33 (03) : 133 - 138
  • [32] Pearls and Pitfalls of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Phillips, Jordana
    Fein-Zachary, Valerie J.
    Slanetz, Priscilla J.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2019, 1 (01) : 64 - 72
  • [33] Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    Lobbes, Marc B., I
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 299 (01) : 36 - 48
  • [34] Artifact reduction in contrast-enhanced mammography
    Gennaro, Gisella
    Baldan, Enrica
    Bezzon, Elisabetta
    Caumo, Francesca
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [35] Comparison of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis for lesion assessment Comparison of contrast-enhanced
    Huang, Hailiang
    Scaduto, David A.
    Liu, Chunling
    Yang, Jie
    Zhu, Chencan
    Rinaldi, Kim
    Eisenberg, Jason
    Liu, Jingxuan
    Hoernig, Mathias
    Wicklein, Julia
    Vogt, Sebastian
    Mertelmeier, Thomas
    Fisher, Paul R.
    Zhao, Wei
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 6 (03)
  • [36] Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography: An Alternative Modality for Evaluation of Nipple Discharge
    Durhan, Gamze
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 217 (01) : W4 - W4
  • [37] The role of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in the evaluation of the postoperative breast cancer
    Helal, M. H.
    Mansour, S. M.
    Ahmed, H. A.
    Ghany, A. F. Abdel
    Kamer, O. F.
    Elkholy, N. G.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (10) : 771 - 781
  • [38] Comparison of Contrast Enhanced Mammography and Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging
    Lewin, John
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 26 (02) : 259 - +
  • [39] Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Comparison With MRI and Mammography
    Yuzkan, Sabahattin
    Cengiz, Duygu
    Hekimsoy, Ilhan
    Okcu, Ozlem Sezgin
    Oktay, Aysenur
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2021, 3 (04) : 448 - 454
  • [40] Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer
    Kim, Eun Young
    Youn, Inyoung
    Lee, Kwan Ho
    Yun, Ji-Sup
    Park, Yong Lai
    Park, Chan Heun
    Moon, Juhee
    Choi, Seon Hyeong
    Choi, Yoon Jung
    Ham, Soo-Youn
    Kook, Shin Ho
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2018, 21 (04) : 453 - 462