Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia: evidence mapping of the randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses

被引:3
|
作者
Xie, Kai [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Guan, Shengnan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Jing, Hui [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ji, Wenshuai [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kong, Xinxin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Du, Shen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Jia, Mingyan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Haifeng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Resp Med, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Univ Chinese Med, Acad Chinese Med Sci, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Henan Univ Chinese Med, Coconstruct Collaborat Innovat Ctr Chinese Med & R, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Henan Univ Chinese Med, Educ Minist PR China, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
severe pneumonia; traditional Chinese medicine; evidence mapping; evidence synthesis; randomized controlled trial; systematic review;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2023.1227436
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: Severe pneumonia is a critical respiratory disease with high mortality. There is insufficient evidence on the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia. This study aims to identify, describe, assess, and summarize the currently available high-quality design evidence on TCM adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia to identify evidence gaps using the evidence mapping approach.Methods: Systematic searches were performed on English and Chinese online databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, CQVIP, and SinoMed) to identify papers from inception until August 2023 for inclusion into the review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews (SRs), and meta-analyses concerning TCM adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia or its complications in adults were included. The risk of bias in RCTs was evaluated by using the Cochrane Handbook ROB tool. The Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2), the Risk of Bias in Systematic Review (ROBIS) tool, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system were used to assess the methodological quality, risk of bias, and evidence quality of SRs or meta-analyses, respectively. Then, a bubble plot was designed to visually display information in four dimensions.Results: A total of 354 RCTs and 17 SRs or meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. The published RCTs had several flaws, such as unreasonable design, limited sample size, insufficient attention to non-drug therapy studies and syndrome differentiation, improper selection or use of outcome indicators, and failure to provide high-quality evidence. Sixteen SRs or meta-analyses of methodological quality scored "Critically Low" confidence. Twelve SRs or meta-analyses were rated as "High Risk." Most outcomes were rated as "Low" evidence quality. We found that TCM combined with conventional treatment could improve the clinical total effective rate and the TCM syndromes efficacy. The combined approach could also shorten mechanical ventilation time, infection control time, and length of hospital and ICU stay; significantly reduce temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, white blood cell counts, levels of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, blood inflammatory factors, bacteriological response, and D-dimer; decrease CPIS, APACHE II score, and PSI score; improve pulmonary imaging features, arterial blood gas indicators (including arterial oxygen pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, and oxygen index), and lung function (including forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in the first second) for severe pneumonia compared with conventional treatment only (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in adverse reactions and incidence of adverse events (p > 0.05). In addition, compared with conventional treatment only, most SRs or meta-analyses concluded that TCM combined with conventional treatment was "Beneficial" or "Probably beneficial."Conclusion: TCM combined with conventional treatment had advantages in efficacy, clinical signs, laboratory results, and life quality outcomes of severe pneumonia, with no difference in safety outcomes compared with conventional treatment only. QingJin Huatan decoction is the most promising target, and Xuanbai Chengqi decoction has a "Probably beneficial" conclusion. XueBiJing injection and TanReQing injection are two commonly used Chinese herbal injections for treating severe pneumonia, and both are "Probably beneficial. " However, there was a need for multicenter RCTs with large sample sizes and high methodological quality in the future. In addition, the methodological design and quality of SRs or meta-analyses should be improved to form high-quality, evidence-based medical evidence and provide evidence for the effectiveness and safety of TCM adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Randomized Trials, Meta-Analyses, and Systematic Reviews: Using Examples from Rheumatology
    Pope, Janet E.
    Hazlewood, Glen S.
    RHEUMATIC DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 44 (02) : 295 - 305
  • [42] A critical appraisal of the methodology and quality of evidence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medical nursing interventions: a systematic review of reviews
    Jin, Ying-Hui
    Wang, Guo-Hao
    Sun, Yi-Rong
    Li, Qi
    Zhao, Chen
    Li, Ge
    Si, Jin-Hua
    Li, Yan
    Lu, Cui
    Shang, Hong-Cai
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (11):
  • [43] Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials, Meta-analyses, and Subgroup Analyses Reply
    Hennekens, Charles H.
    DeMets, David
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (13): : 1254 - 1255
  • [44] Overview of systematic reviews with meta-analyses on Chinese herbal medicine in stroke management
    Hung, Caroline Yik-fong
    Chung, Vincent Chi-ho
    Wu, Xin-yin
    Ho, Robin Sze-tak
    Tang, Endy Chun-hung
    Wu, Justin Che-yuen
    Lau, Alexander Yuk-lun
    ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 6 (03) : 126 - 138
  • [45] Review of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses investigating Traditional Chinese Medicine treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Liu Meijun
    Liu Zhicheng
    Xu Bin
    Zhang Wei
    Cai Jianwei
    JournalofTraditionalChineseMedicine, 2016, 36 (05) : 555 - 563
  • [46] Review of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses investigating Traditional Chinese Medicine treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Liu Meijun
    Liu Zhicheng
    Xu Bin
    Zhang Wei
    Cai Jianwei
    JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE, 2016, 36 (05) : 555 - 563
  • [47] Traditional Chinese Medicine in the treatment of recurrent respiratory tract infections in children: an overview of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses
    Deng, Yasheng
    Han, Siyin
    Xi, Lanhua
    Huang, Hui
    Liang, Tianwei
    Zheng, Yiqing
    Fan, Yanping
    Lin, Jiang
    JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE, 2024, 44 (05) : 871 - 884
  • [48] Efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Yong
    Shi, Yi-hua
    Xu, Zhen
    Fu, Huan
    Zeng, Hua
    Zheng, Guo-qing
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2019, 117 : 74 - 91
  • [49] The Efficacy of Traditional Chinese Herbal Medicine Across Multiple Cardiovascular Diseases: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Li, Xi
    Yu, Tao
    Jiang, Qin
    Tan, Jin
    Liu, Ke
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 83 (04) : 340 - 352
  • [50] Effects of Traditional Chinese Medicine Injections for Anthracyclines-induced Cardiotoxicity: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
    Li, Chenchen
    Zheng, Yuling
    Niu, Dong
    Zhu, Ranpei
    Yan, Xiaoyu
    Qu, Haoran
    Zhang, Yaling
    INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2023, 22