Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia: evidence mapping of the randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses

被引:3
|
作者
Xie, Kai [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Guan, Shengnan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Jing, Hui [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ji, Wenshuai [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kong, Xinxin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Du, Shen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Jia, Mingyan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Haifeng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Resp Med, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Univ Chinese Med, Acad Chinese Med Sci, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Henan Univ Chinese Med, Coconstruct Collaborat Innovat Ctr Chinese Med & R, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Henan Univ Chinese Med, Educ Minist PR China, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
severe pneumonia; traditional Chinese medicine; evidence mapping; evidence synthesis; randomized controlled trial; systematic review;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2023.1227436
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: Severe pneumonia is a critical respiratory disease with high mortality. There is insufficient evidence on the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia. This study aims to identify, describe, assess, and summarize the currently available high-quality design evidence on TCM adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia to identify evidence gaps using the evidence mapping approach.Methods: Systematic searches were performed on English and Chinese online databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, CQVIP, and SinoMed) to identify papers from inception until August 2023 for inclusion into the review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews (SRs), and meta-analyses concerning TCM adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia or its complications in adults were included. The risk of bias in RCTs was evaluated by using the Cochrane Handbook ROB tool. The Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2), the Risk of Bias in Systematic Review (ROBIS) tool, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system were used to assess the methodological quality, risk of bias, and evidence quality of SRs or meta-analyses, respectively. Then, a bubble plot was designed to visually display information in four dimensions.Results: A total of 354 RCTs and 17 SRs or meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. The published RCTs had several flaws, such as unreasonable design, limited sample size, insufficient attention to non-drug therapy studies and syndrome differentiation, improper selection or use of outcome indicators, and failure to provide high-quality evidence. Sixteen SRs or meta-analyses of methodological quality scored "Critically Low" confidence. Twelve SRs or meta-analyses were rated as "High Risk." Most outcomes were rated as "Low" evidence quality. We found that TCM combined with conventional treatment could improve the clinical total effective rate and the TCM syndromes efficacy. The combined approach could also shorten mechanical ventilation time, infection control time, and length of hospital and ICU stay; significantly reduce temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, white blood cell counts, levels of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, blood inflammatory factors, bacteriological response, and D-dimer; decrease CPIS, APACHE II score, and PSI score; improve pulmonary imaging features, arterial blood gas indicators (including arterial oxygen pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, and oxygen index), and lung function (including forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in the first second) for severe pneumonia compared with conventional treatment only (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in adverse reactions and incidence of adverse events (p > 0.05). In addition, compared with conventional treatment only, most SRs or meta-analyses concluded that TCM combined with conventional treatment was "Beneficial" or "Probably beneficial."Conclusion: TCM combined with conventional treatment had advantages in efficacy, clinical signs, laboratory results, and life quality outcomes of severe pneumonia, with no difference in safety outcomes compared with conventional treatment only. QingJin Huatan decoction is the most promising target, and Xuanbai Chengqi decoction has a "Probably beneficial" conclusion. XueBiJing injection and TanReQing injection are two commonly used Chinese herbal injections for treating severe pneumonia, and both are "Probably beneficial. " However, there was a need for multicenter RCTs with large sample sizes and high methodological quality in the future. In addition, the methodological design and quality of SRs or meta-analyses should be improved to form high-quality, evidence-based medical evidence and provide evidence for the effectiveness and safety of TCM adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A QUALITY ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS IN DENTISTRY, PART 1: META-ANALYSES OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    El-Rabbany, Mohamed
    Li, Silvia
    Bui, Stephanie
    Muir, Jeffrey M.
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Azarpazhooh, Amir
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2017, 17 (04) : 389 - 398
  • [22] Traditional Chinese medicine treatment for COVID-19: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses br
    Wu, Han-ting
    Ji, Cong-hua
    Dai, Rong-chen
    Hei, Pei-jie
    Liang, Juan
    Wu, Xia-qiu
    Li, Qiu-shuang
    Yang, Jun-chao
    Mao, Wei
    Guo, Qing
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE-JIM, 2022, 20 (05): : 416 - 426
  • [23] Traditional Chinese medicine for smoking cessation: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lu, Chun -Li
    Jin, Xin-Yan
    Wang, Qian-Yun
    Chen, Xiao-Ying
    Zheng, Ruo-Xiang
    Wang, Chao-Jie
    Jiang, Jing-Jing
    Qiao, Shu-Yu
    Yang, Si -Hong
    Zhang, Wei -Han
    Chen, Si-Yi
    Li, Jia-Xuan
    Liu, Xue-Han
    Suo, Yu-Si
    Wang, Jian-Hua
    Xue, Xue
    Liang, Li-Rong
    Robinson, Nicola
    Liu, Jian-Ping
    TOBACCO INDUCED DISEASES, 2023, 21
  • [24] NIDCAP: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ohlsson, Arne
    Jacobs, Susan E.
    PEDIATRICS, 2013, 131 (03) : E881 - E893
  • [25] The Traditional Chinese Medicine and Relevant Treatment for the Efficacy and Safety of Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Shi, Zhao-feng
    Song, Tie-bing
    Xie, Juan
    Yan, Yi-quan
    Du, Yong-ping
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 2017
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of epilepsy: A updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lu, Haimei
    Luo, Mengxian
    Chen, Rongrong
    Luo, Yijun
    Xi, Anran
    Wang, Keer
    Xu, Zhenghao
    EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2023, 189
  • [27] Efficacy and Safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine on Nonerosive Reflux Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Xiao, Jiao
    Yang, Yunfeng
    Zhu, Yuanrong
    Qin, Yan
    Li, Yifan
    Fu, Mengjie
    Zhai, Zhengdong
    Zhu, Lingyun
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 2018
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for Tourette's syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Qi, Han
    Liu, Rui
    Zheng, Wei
    Zhang, Ling
    Ungvari, Gabor S.
    Ng, Chee H.
    Wang, Gang
    Xiang, Yu-Tao
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 47
  • [29] The effects of foods on LDL cholesterol levels: A systematic review of the accumulated evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials
    Schoeneck, Malin
    Iggman, David
    NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2021, 31 (05) : 1325 - 1338
  • [30] Efficacy and Safety of Huachansu as an Adjuvant Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
    Yang, Tiantian
    Wu, Caixian
    Li, Peicong
    Zhong, Yuetong
    Wu, Wanyin
    Wang, Sumei
    Yang, Xiaobing
    INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2024, 23