Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia: evidence mapping of the randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses

被引:3
|
作者
Xie, Kai [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Guan, Shengnan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Jing, Hui [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ji, Wenshuai [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kong, Xinxin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Du, Shen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Jia, Mingyan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Haifeng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Resp Med, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Univ Chinese Med, Acad Chinese Med Sci, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Henan Univ Chinese Med, Coconstruct Collaborat Innovat Ctr Chinese Med & R, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Henan Univ Chinese Med, Educ Minist PR China, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
severe pneumonia; traditional Chinese medicine; evidence mapping; evidence synthesis; randomized controlled trial; systematic review;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2023.1227436
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: Severe pneumonia is a critical respiratory disease with high mortality. There is insufficient evidence on the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia. This study aims to identify, describe, assess, and summarize the currently available high-quality design evidence on TCM adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia to identify evidence gaps using the evidence mapping approach.Methods: Systematic searches were performed on English and Chinese online databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, CQVIP, and SinoMed) to identify papers from inception until August 2023 for inclusion into the review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews (SRs), and meta-analyses concerning TCM adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia or its complications in adults were included. The risk of bias in RCTs was evaluated by using the Cochrane Handbook ROB tool. The Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2), the Risk of Bias in Systematic Review (ROBIS) tool, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system were used to assess the methodological quality, risk of bias, and evidence quality of SRs or meta-analyses, respectively. Then, a bubble plot was designed to visually display information in four dimensions.Results: A total of 354 RCTs and 17 SRs or meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. The published RCTs had several flaws, such as unreasonable design, limited sample size, insufficient attention to non-drug therapy studies and syndrome differentiation, improper selection or use of outcome indicators, and failure to provide high-quality evidence. Sixteen SRs or meta-analyses of methodological quality scored "Critically Low" confidence. Twelve SRs or meta-analyses were rated as "High Risk." Most outcomes were rated as "Low" evidence quality. We found that TCM combined with conventional treatment could improve the clinical total effective rate and the TCM syndromes efficacy. The combined approach could also shorten mechanical ventilation time, infection control time, and length of hospital and ICU stay; significantly reduce temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, white blood cell counts, levels of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, blood inflammatory factors, bacteriological response, and D-dimer; decrease CPIS, APACHE II score, and PSI score; improve pulmonary imaging features, arterial blood gas indicators (including arterial oxygen pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, and oxygen index), and lung function (including forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in the first second) for severe pneumonia compared with conventional treatment only (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in adverse reactions and incidence of adverse events (p > 0.05). In addition, compared with conventional treatment only, most SRs or meta-analyses concluded that TCM combined with conventional treatment was "Beneficial" or "Probably beneficial."Conclusion: TCM combined with conventional treatment had advantages in efficacy, clinical signs, laboratory results, and life quality outcomes of severe pneumonia, with no difference in safety outcomes compared with conventional treatment only. QingJin Huatan decoction is the most promising target, and Xuanbai Chengqi decoction has a "Probably beneficial" conclusion. XueBiJing injection and TanReQing injection are two commonly used Chinese herbal injections for treating severe pneumonia, and both are "Probably beneficial. " However, there was a need for multicenter RCTs with large sample sizes and high methodological quality in the future. In addition, the methodological design and quality of SRs or meta-analyses should be improved to form high-quality, evidence-based medical evidence and provide evidence for the effectiveness and safety of TCM adjuvant therapy for severe pneumonia.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of pancreatic cancer: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Wang, Jing
    Wang, Qiuyuan
    Zhang, Peitong
    Zhang, Ruoqi
    He, Jie
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [2] Acupuncture for atopic eczema: Evidence mapping-based randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses
    Jiao, Rui-min
    Xiu, Wen-cui
    Li, Bo-ling
    Hu, Xiao-yi
    Shi, Lan -jun
    Tian, Zi-yu
    Yang, Ji-wei
    Hu, Xiang-yu
    Gang, Wei-juan
    Jing, Xiang-hong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ACUPUNCTURE-MOXIBUSTION, 2022, 32 (04) : 261 - 270
  • [3] Clinical Application of Chinese Herbal Injection for Cancer Care: Evidence-Mapping of the Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Randomized Controlled Trials
    Yang, Ming
    Zhu, Si-jia
    Shen, Chen
    Zhai, Rui
    Li, Duo-duo
    Fang, Min
    Xu, Jing-nan
    Gan, Ye-na
    Yang, Lu
    Ren, Zhi-ying
    Zheng, Ruo-xiang
    Robinson, Nicola
    Liu, Jian-ping
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [4] Chinese Herbal Medicine for the Treatment of Adult Viral Myocarditis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Hui, Xiao-Shan
    Wang, Shi-Qi
    Lu, Shi-chao
    Liu, Yong-Mei
    Zhang, Zhen-Peng
    Lian, Wen-jing
    Zhou, Si-Yuan
    Zhang, Hui
    Zhang, Jin-sheng
    Wang, Jie
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 45 (10) : 991 - 1003
  • [5] Efficacy and Safety of Huaier Granule as an Adjuvant Therapy for Cancer: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
    Chen, Jixin
    Chen, Shuqi
    Zhou, Yushu
    Wang, Sumei
    Wu, Wanyin
    INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2022, 21
  • [6] Efficacy and Safety of Huaier Granule as an Adjuvant Therapy for Cancer: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
    Chen, Jixin
    Chen, Shuqi
    Zhou, Yushu
    Wang, Sumei
    Wu, Wanyin
    INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2022, 21
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine decoction as an adjuvant treatment for diabetic nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zheng, Shuyu
    Xu, Yunxi
    Zhang, Ya
    Long, Caiyi
    Chen, Guo
    Jin, Zhao
    Jiang, Shui
    Chen, Junyu
    Qin, Yulian
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [8] Meta-analyses in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in perinatal medicine: comparison of fixed and random effects models
    Villar, J
    Mackey, ME
    Carroli, G
    Donner, A
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (23) : 3635 - 3647
  • [9] Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized trials, and observational studies
    Ranstam, Jonas
    Wagner, Philippe
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2022, 93 : 1 - 2
  • [10] Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized trials, and observational studies
    Ranstam, Jonas
    Wagner, Philippe
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2022, 93 : 1 - 2