A systematic review and meta-analysis of postmastectomy radiation therapy on prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction

被引:2
|
作者
Zheng, Caihong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Jiameng [4 ]
Wen, Yahui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lin, Shunguo [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Han, Hui [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Xu, Chunsen [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Grad Sch, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Breast Surg, Union Hosp, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Union Hosp, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Univ, Women & Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Breast Surg, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Med Univ, Breast Canc Inst, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 9卷
关键词
breast; reconstration; postmastectomy; radiation; prepectoral; subspectral; MASTECTOMY;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.1019950
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPrepectoral breast reconstruction has once again appealed, which attributes to the introduction of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and mesh. Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), meanwhile, is crucial in the whole course of treatment for breast cancer patients with lymph node-positive. The impact of PMRT on outcomes after prepectoral breast reconstruction has not been clearly defined to date. This study aimed to compare the impact of PMRT on outcomes after prepectoral vs. subpectoral breast reconstruction. MethodsA comprehensive research on databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries was performed to retrieve literature pertaining to prepectoral breast reconstruction from database inception to October 2021. All included studies evaluated the impact of PMRT on outcomes after breast reconstruction. Only studies comparing patients who underwent prepectoral breast reconstruction with a control group who underwent subpectoral breast reconstruction were included. Data were analyzed using RevMan version 5.2. ResultsA total of 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 394 breasts. In the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy, 164 breasts were reconstructed with a prepectoral approach, whereas the remaining 230 breasts underwent subpectoral reconstruction. Overall, outcomes between PBR and SBR was no statistical significance in the overall complications (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.35-4.85), infection (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 0.90-2.91), seroma (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 0.48-5.27), skin flap necrosis (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.17-3.45), hematoma (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.10-1.41), wound dehiscence (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.36-1.85). But, included studies lacked data about the patient quality of life and satisfaction with the outcome of the reconstructed breast. ConclusionsIn the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy, prepectoral breast reconstruction is a safe and effective option.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF DELAYED VERSUS IMMEDIATE AUTOLOGOUS BREAST RECONSTRUCTION IN THE SETTING OF POST-MASTECTOMY RADIATION THERAPY
    Hershenhouse, K. S.
    Bick, K.
    Shauly, O.
    Kondra, K.
    Ye, J.
    Gould, D. J.
    Patel, K. M.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 69 (01) : 290 - 290
  • [42] Discussion: Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: An Assessment of Clinical Outcomes and Benefits
    Gabriel, Allen
    Maxwell, G. Patrick
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (01) : 21 - 23
  • [43] Safety of Tissue Expander/Implant versus Autologous Abdominal Tissue Breast Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tsoi, Bernice
    Ziolkowski, Natalia I.
    Thoma, Achilleas
    Campbell, Kaitryn
    O'Reilly, Daria
    Goeree, Ron
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 133 (02) : 234 - 249
  • [44] Reply: Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: An Assessment of Clinical Outcomes and Benefits
    Sbitany, Hani
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (05) : 928E - 929E
  • [45] Systematic review and meta-analysis of immediate versus delayed autologous breast reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy adjuvant radiation therapy
    Hershenhouse, Korri S.
    Bick, Katherine
    Shauly, Orr
    Kondra, Katelyn
    Ye, Jason
    Gould, Daniel J.
    Patel, Ketan M.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2021, 74 (05): : 931 - 944
  • [46] Assessing Postsurgical Outcomes with Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Literature Review and Meta-analysis Update
    Chatterjee, Abhishek
    Nahabedian, Maurice Y.
    Gabriel, Allen
    Sporck, Michael
    Parekh, Mousam
    Macarios, David
    Hammer, Jason
    Sigalove, Steven
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (10) : E3825
  • [47] Feasibility and Efficacy of Decision Aids to Improve Decision Making for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Berlin, Nicholas L.
    Tandon, Vickram J.
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    Hamill, Jennifer B.
    MacEachern, Mark P.
    Lee, Clara N.
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2019, 39 (01) : 5 - 20
  • [48] A systematic review of complications in prepectoral breast reconstruction
    Wagner, Ryan D.
    Braun, Tara L.
    Zhu, Huirong
    Winocour, Sebastian
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2019, 72 (07): : 1051 - 1059
  • [49] A Comparative Analysis between Subpectoral versus Prepectoral Single Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Kim, Jeong-Hoon
    Hong, Seung Eun
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2020, 56 (10): : 1 - 10
  • [50] Considerations for patient selection: Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction
    Yang, Jun Young
    Kim, Chan Woo
    Lee, Jang Won
    Kim, Seung Ki
    Lee, Seung Ah
    Hwang, Euna
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2019, 46 (06): : 550 - 557