A systematic review and meta-analysis of postmastectomy radiation therapy on prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction

被引:2
|
作者
Zheng, Caihong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Jiameng [4 ]
Wen, Yahui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lin, Shunguo [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Han, Hui [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Xu, Chunsen [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Grad Sch, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Breast Surg, Union Hosp, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Union Hosp, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Univ, Women & Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Breast Surg, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Med Univ, Breast Canc Inst, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 9卷
关键词
breast; reconstration; postmastectomy; radiation; prepectoral; subspectral; MASTECTOMY;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.1019950
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPrepectoral breast reconstruction has once again appealed, which attributes to the introduction of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and mesh. Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), meanwhile, is crucial in the whole course of treatment for breast cancer patients with lymph node-positive. The impact of PMRT on outcomes after prepectoral breast reconstruction has not been clearly defined to date. This study aimed to compare the impact of PMRT on outcomes after prepectoral vs. subpectoral breast reconstruction. MethodsA comprehensive research on databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries was performed to retrieve literature pertaining to prepectoral breast reconstruction from database inception to October 2021. All included studies evaluated the impact of PMRT on outcomes after breast reconstruction. Only studies comparing patients who underwent prepectoral breast reconstruction with a control group who underwent subpectoral breast reconstruction were included. Data were analyzed using RevMan version 5.2. ResultsA total of 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 394 breasts. In the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy, 164 breasts were reconstructed with a prepectoral approach, whereas the remaining 230 breasts underwent subpectoral reconstruction. Overall, outcomes between PBR and SBR was no statistical significance in the overall complications (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.35-4.85), infection (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 0.90-2.91), seroma (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 0.48-5.27), skin flap necrosis (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.17-3.45), hematoma (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.10-1.41), wound dehiscence (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.36-1.85). But, included studies lacked data about the patient quality of life and satisfaction with the outcome of the reconstructed breast. ConclusionsIn the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy, prepectoral breast reconstruction is a safe and effective option.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Liwen Zhu
    Chunjun Liu
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2023, 47 : 1260 - 1273
  • [22] Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Daniele Fusario
    Donato Casella
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2024, 48 : 13 - 14
  • [23] Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhu, Liwen
    Liu, Chunjun
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (04) : 1260 - 1273
  • [24] Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ching, Ann Hui
    Lim, Kimberley
    Sze, Pek Wan
    Ooi, Adrian
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (08): : 2550 - 2560
  • [25] A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prepectoral single-stage breast reconstruction
    Liu, Jiameng
    Zheng, Xiaobin
    Lin, Shunguo
    Han, Hui
    Xu, Chunsen
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (07) : 5659 - 5668
  • [26] A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prepectoral single-stage breast reconstruction
    Jiameng Liu
    Xiaobin Zheng
    Shunguo Lin
    Hui Han
    Chunsen Xu
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 5659 - 5668
  • [27] Invited Response on: Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Liwen Zhu
    Chunjun Liu
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2024, 48 : 15 - 16
  • [28] Invited Response on: Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhu, Liwen
    Liu, Chunjun
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 48 (01) : 15 - 16
  • [29] Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy
    Elswick, Sarah M.
    Harless, Christin A.
    Bishop, Sarah N.
    Schleck, Cathy D.
    Mandrekar, Jay
    Reusche, Ryan D.
    Mutter, Robert W.
    Boughey, Judy C.
    Jacobson, Steven R.
    Lemaine, Valerie
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [30] Examination of Outcome Disparities in Reports of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Montorfano, Lisandro
    Hung, Ya-Ching
    Chaker, Sara
    Saad, Mariam
    Kalmar, Christopher L.
    Ferri, Francisco
    Higdon, Kent K.
    Perdikis, Galen
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 90 (05) : 506 - 515