Transoral robotic surgery in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A comparative study between da Vinci Single-Port and da Vinci Xi systems

被引:2
|
作者
Costantino, Andrea [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sampieri, Claudio [3 ,4 ]
Meliante, Piero Giuseppe [3 ,5 ,6 ]
De Virgilio, Armando [1 ]
Kim, Se-Heon [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Human Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, I-20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
[2] IRCCS Human Res Hosp, Otorhinolaryngol Unit, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, MI, Italy
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Univ Genoa, Dept Expt Med DIMES, Genoa, Italy
[5] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Sense Organs, Rome, Italy
[6] Azienda Ospedaliera Policlin Umberto, Viale Univ,33, I-00161 Rome, RM, Italy
[7] Yonsei Univ, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
Head and neck cancer; TORS; Robotic-assisted surgery; Complications; Oropharyngeal cancer; Functional outcomes; Surgical margins; CLINICAL-TRIAL; FEASIBILITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106629
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The recently developed da Vinci single-port (SP) system offers potential advantages in maneuverability within narrower surgical spaces. This study aims to compare intra- and post-operative outcomes, technical advantages, and limitations of transoral resections using the da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi systems for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with OPSCC who underwent transoral robotic surgery (TORS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). Data on pre-operative variables, intraoperative data, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes were collected.Results: A total of 209 patients (males: 175; mean age: 59.0 +/- 9.3) were included (SP: n = 136; Xi: n = 73). A significantly lower docking time was measured for the SP group (5.7 +/- 2.5 min vs. 10.0 +/- 4.4 min; p <.001). Similarly, the console time was reduced for the SP group though not reaching statistical significance (76.3 +/- 30.7 min vs. 88.1 +/- 36.9 min; p =.06). A greater proportion of patients showed wide negative resection margins in the SP group (71 % vs. 56 %; p =.10), although not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed in complication rates or postoperative functional outcomes.Discussion: This study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of the da Vinci SP system in oropharyngeal surgery, with potential advantages in terms of reduced docking and console times. The findings suggest that the SP system offers improved maneuverability and instrument placement compared to the da Vinci Xi system.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robotic Adrenalectomy Using the da Vinci SP Robotic System: Technical Feasibility Comparison with Single-Port Access Using the da Vinci Multi-arm Robotic System
    Lee, In A.
    Kim, Jin Kyong
    Kim, Kwangsoon
    Kang, Sang-Wook
    Lee, Jandee
    Jeong, Jong Ju
    Nam, Kee-Hyun
    Chung, Woong Youn
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (05) : 3085 - 3092
  • [42] Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) Using the Da Vinci Xi: a Prospective Analysis of Oncological and Functional Outcomes
    Meulemans, Jeroen
    Vanermen, Margaux
    Goeleven, Ann
    Clement, Paul
    Nuyts, Sandra
    Laenen, Annouschka
    Delaere, Pierre
    Vander Poorten, Vincent
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 118
  • [43] Comparing the Approach to Radical Prostatectomy Using the Multiport da Vinci Xi and Single-port da Vinci SP Robots: A Propensity Score Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Bhat, Seetharam
    Sandri, Marco
    Rogers, Travis
    Onol, Fikret
    Mazzone, Elio
    Roof, Shannon
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Patel, Vipul
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 (03) : 393 - 404
  • [44] Is the Da Vinci Xi system a real improvement for oncologic transoral robotic surgery? A systematic review of the literature
    Fiacchini, Giacomo
    Vianini, Matteo
    Dallan, Iacopo
    Bruschini, Luca
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2021, 15 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [45] Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) using the da Vinci Xi: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and outcomes
    Meulemans, Jeroen
    Vanermen, Margaux
    Goeleven, Ann
    Clement, Paul
    Nuyts, Sandra
    Laenen, Annouschka
    Delaere, Pierre
    Vander Poorten, Vincent
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2022, 44 (01): : 143 - 157
  • [46] Is the Da Vinci Xi system a real improvement for oncologic transoral robotic surgery? A systematic review of the literature
    Giacomo Fiacchini
    Matteo Vianini
    Iacopo Dallan
    Luca Bruschini
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2021, 15 : 1 - 12
  • [47] Evaluation of the da Vinci single-port system in colorectal cancer surgery: a scoping review
    Arcangelo Picciariello
    Alfredo Annicchiarico
    Gaetano Gallo
    Agnese Dezi
    Ugo Grossi
    Updates in Surgery, 2024, 76 (7) : 2515 - 2520
  • [48] ROBOTIC ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL CYSTECTOMY USING THE DA-VINCI SINGLE-PORT ROBOTIC SYSTEM
    Tonzi, Michael
    Singh, Amar
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E601 - E601
  • [49] HEALTHCARE FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS EVALUATING DA VINCI XI TRANSPERITONEAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH DA VINCI SINGLE PORT PROSTATECTOMY
    King, Tonya S.
    Dolgetta, Genesis G.
    Guske, Christopher W.
    Behers, Benjamin J.
    Kortum, Spencer
    Carey, Maximilian S.
    Ghazli, Karim
    Carey, Robert I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E1283 - E1284
  • [50] Da Vinci single-port robotic system current application and future perspective in general surgery: A scoping review
    Celotto, Francesco
    Ramacciotti, Niccolo
    Mangano, Alberto
    Danieli, Giacomo
    Pinto, Federico
    Lopez, Paula
    Ducas, Alvaro
    Cassiani, Jessica
    Morelli, Luca
    Spolverato, Gaya
    Bianco, Francesco Maria
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (09): : 4814 - 4830