Transoral robotic surgery in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A comparative study between da Vinci Single-Port and da Vinci Xi systems

被引:2
|
作者
Costantino, Andrea [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sampieri, Claudio [3 ,4 ]
Meliante, Piero Giuseppe [3 ,5 ,6 ]
De Virgilio, Armando [1 ]
Kim, Se-Heon [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Human Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, I-20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
[2] IRCCS Human Res Hosp, Otorhinolaryngol Unit, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, MI, Italy
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Univ Genoa, Dept Expt Med DIMES, Genoa, Italy
[5] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Sense Organs, Rome, Italy
[6] Azienda Ospedaliera Policlin Umberto, Viale Univ,33, I-00161 Rome, RM, Italy
[7] Yonsei Univ, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
Head and neck cancer; TORS; Robotic-assisted surgery; Complications; Oropharyngeal cancer; Functional outcomes; Surgical margins; CLINICAL-TRIAL; FEASIBILITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106629
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The recently developed da Vinci single-port (SP) system offers potential advantages in maneuverability within narrower surgical spaces. This study aims to compare intra- and post-operative outcomes, technical advantages, and limitations of transoral resections using the da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi systems for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with OPSCC who underwent transoral robotic surgery (TORS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). Data on pre-operative variables, intraoperative data, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes were collected.Results: A total of 209 patients (males: 175; mean age: 59.0 +/- 9.3) were included (SP: n = 136; Xi: n = 73). A significantly lower docking time was measured for the SP group (5.7 +/- 2.5 min vs. 10.0 +/- 4.4 min; p <.001). Similarly, the console time was reduced for the SP group though not reaching statistical significance (76.3 +/- 30.7 min vs. 88.1 +/- 36.9 min; p =.06). A greater proportion of patients showed wide negative resection margins in the SP group (71 % vs. 56 %; p =.10), although not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed in complication rates or postoperative functional outcomes.Discussion: This study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of the da Vinci SP system in oropharyngeal surgery, with potential advantages in terms of reduced docking and console times. The findings suggest that the SP system offers improved maneuverability and instrument placement compared to the da Vinci Xi system.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Technique and perioperative outcomes of single-port robotic surgery using the da Vinci SP platform in urology
    Kim, Kwang Hyun
    Ahn, Hyun Kyu
    Kim, Myong
    Yoon, Hana
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (01) : 472 - 477
  • [32] Outcomes of single-port robotic ureteral reconstruction using the da Vinci SP® system
    Heo, Ji Eun
    Kang, Sung Ku
    Lee, Jongsoo
    Koh, Donghoon
    Kim, Min Seok
    Lee, Yong Seung
    Ham, Won Sik
    Jang, Won Sik
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2023, 64 (04) : 373 - 379
  • [33] Feasibility and Efficacy of Single-Port Robotic Cholecystectomy Using the da Vinci SP® Platform
    Kim, Wan-Joon
    Choi, Sae-Byeol
    Kim, Wan-Bae
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2022, 26 (02)
  • [34] Comparing the approach to radical prostatectomy using the Da Vinci Xi and Da Vinci Single Port: A propensity score analysis
    Covas Moschovas, M.
    Bhat, S.
    Sandri, M.
    Rogers, T.
    Mazzone, E.
    Roof, S.
    Mottrie, A.
    Patel, V.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1577 - S1577
  • [35] Technical feasibility of da Vinci SP single-port robotic cholecystectomy: a case report
    Cruz, Charles Jimenez
    Yang, Hye Yeon
    Kang, Incheon
    Kang, Chang Moo
    Lee, Woo Jung
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 97 (04) : 217 - 221
  • [36] COMPARING THE APPROACH TO RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY USING THE DA VINCI XI AND DA VINCI SINGLE PORT: A PROPENSITY SCORE ANALYSIS
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Bhat, Seetharam
    Rogers, Travis
    Sandri, Maro
    Mazzone, Ellio
    Onol, Fikret
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Patel, Vipul
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E263 - E263
  • [37] The Settings, Pros and Cons of the New Surgical Robot da Vinci Xi System for Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS): A Comparison With the Popular da Vinci Si System
    Kim, Da Hee
    Kim, Hwan
    Kwak, Sanghyun
    Baek, Kwangha
    Na, Gina
    Kim, Ji Hoon
    Kim, Se Heon
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2016, 26 (05): : 391 - 396
  • [38] Comparison of da Vinci Single Port vs Si Systems for Transoral Robotic-Assisted Surgery: A Review With Technical Insights
    Oberhelman, Nicholas
    Bruening, Jennifer
    Jackson, Ryan S.
    Van Abel, Kathryn M.
    Sumer, Baran
    Holsinger, F. Christopher
    Chan, Jason Y. K.
    Gross, Neil D.
    Clayburgh, Daniel R.
    Andersen, Peter E.
    Li, Ryan J.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2024, 150 (02) : 165 - 171
  • [39] Load evaluation of the da Vinci surgical system for transoral robotic surgery
    Fujiwara K.
    Fukuhara T.
    Niimi K.
    Sato T.
    Kitano H.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2015, 9 (4) : 315 - 319
  • [40] Robotic Adrenalectomy Using the da Vinci SP Robotic System: Technical Feasibility Comparison with Single-Port Access Using the da Vinci Multi-arm Robotic System
    In A Lee
    Jin Kyong Kim
    Kwangsoon Kim
    Sang-Wook Kang
    Jandee Lee
    Jong Ju Jeong
    Kee-Hyun Nam
    Woong Youn Chung
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2022, 29 : 3085 - 3092