Transoral robotic surgery in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A comparative study between da Vinci Single-Port and da Vinci Xi systems

被引:2
|
作者
Costantino, Andrea [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sampieri, Claudio [3 ,4 ]
Meliante, Piero Giuseppe [3 ,5 ,6 ]
De Virgilio, Armando [1 ]
Kim, Se-Heon [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Human Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, I-20090 Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy
[2] IRCCS Human Res Hosp, Otorhinolaryngol Unit, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, MI, Italy
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Univ Genoa, Dept Expt Med DIMES, Genoa, Italy
[5] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Sense Organs, Rome, Italy
[6] Azienda Ospedaliera Policlin Umberto, Viale Univ,33, I-00161 Rome, RM, Italy
[7] Yonsei Univ, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
Head and neck cancer; TORS; Robotic-assisted surgery; Complications; Oropharyngeal cancer; Functional outcomes; Surgical margins; CLINICAL-TRIAL; FEASIBILITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106629
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The recently developed da Vinci single-port (SP) system offers potential advantages in maneuverability within narrower surgical spaces. This study aims to compare intra- and post-operative outcomes, technical advantages, and limitations of transoral resections using the da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi systems for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with OPSCC who underwent transoral robotic surgery (TORS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). Data on pre-operative variables, intraoperative data, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes were collected.Results: A total of 209 patients (males: 175; mean age: 59.0 +/- 9.3) were included (SP: n = 136; Xi: n = 73). A significantly lower docking time was measured for the SP group (5.7 +/- 2.5 min vs. 10.0 +/- 4.4 min; p <.001). Similarly, the console time was reduced for the SP group though not reaching statistical significance (76.3 +/- 30.7 min vs. 88.1 +/- 36.9 min; p =.06). A greater proportion of patients showed wide negative resection margins in the SP group (71 % vs. 56 %; p =.10), although not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed in complication rates or postoperative functional outcomes.Discussion: This study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of the da Vinci SP system in oropharyngeal surgery, with potential advantages in terms of reduced docking and console times. The findings suggest that the SP system offers improved maneuverability and instrument placement compared to the da Vinci Xi system.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transoral robotic surgery in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A comparative study between da Vinci Single-Port and da Vinci Xi systems
    Lopes, Natalia Vitoria de Araujo
    Alves, Pollianna Muniz
    Cunha, Lennon Silva
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 148
  • [2] Reply to: Comment on "Transoral robotic surgery in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A comparative study between da Vinci Single-Port and da Vinci Xi systems"
    Costantino, Andrea
    Sampieri, Claudio
    Meliante, Piero Giuseppe
    De Virgilio, Armando
    Kim, Se-Heon
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 150
  • [3] Single-Port Versus Multiport da Vinci System for Transoral Robotic Surgery of Hypopharyngeal and Laryngeal Carcinoma
    Sampieri, Claudio
    Pirola, Francesca
    Costantino, Andrea
    Kim, Dahee
    Ho, Jung J.
    Lee, Kyuin
    De Virgilio, Armando
    Park, Young M.
    Kim, Se-Heon
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2023, 169 (03) : 548 - 555
  • [4] Transoral robotic surgery for the base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary comparison between da Vinci Xi and Si
    Alessandrini M.
    Pavone I.
    Micarelli A.
    Caporale C.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2018, 12 (3) : 417 - 423
  • [6] Comparison of perioperative outcomes of single-port da Vinci SP and multiport da Vinci Xi robotic systems in robotic-assisted urologic surgeries
    Dennis, C.
    Morgantini, L. A.
    Zuberek, M.
    Francavilla, S.
    Trippel, R. S.
    Crivellaro, S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S33 - S34
  • [7] COMPARISON OF PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF SINGLE-PORT DA VINCI SP AND MULTIPORT DA VINCI XI ROBOTIC SYSTEMS IN ROBOTIC-ASSISTED UROLOGIC SURGERIES
    Dennis, Christopher
    Morgantini, Luca
    Zuberek, Marcin
    Francavilla, Simone
    Trippel, Ryan
    Crivellaro, Simone
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E538 - E538
  • [8] Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
    Covas Moschovas, Marcio
    Bhat, Seetharam
    Rogers, Travis
    Noel, Jonathan
    Reddy, Sunil
    Patel, Vipul
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 : S93 - S99
  • [9] Reproductive surgery for fertility preservation: Robotic single-port myomectomy (da Vinci® SP) versus robotic single-site myomectomy (da Vinci® Xi or Si)
    Jeong, K.
    Lee, J. H.
    Park, S. Y.
    Shin, W.
    Chung, H. W.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39 : I170 - I170
  • [10] Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery
    Kim, Jeong-Min
    Lee, Seon-Mi
    Seol, Aeran
    Song, Jae-Yun
    Ryu, Ki-Jin
    Lee, Sanghoon
    Park, Hyun-Tae
    Cho, Hyun-Woong
    Min, Kyung-Jin
    Hong, Jin-Hwa
    Lee, Jae-Kwan
    Lee, Nak-Woo
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (02):