A framework for accessing the equilibrium point of a multi-objective decision-making (MODM): a case study

被引:3
|
作者
Abedian, Mansour [1 ]
Jouzdani, Javid [2 ]
Karimpour, AmirHossein [3 ]
Hejazi, Maryam [4 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Najafabad Branch, Najafabad, Iran
[2] Golpayegan Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn, Golpayegan, Iran
[3] Yazd Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Yazd, Iran
[4] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept English Language, Najafabad Branch, Najafabad, Iran
关键词
Production planning; Multi-objective decision-making (MODM); Game theory; Nash solution; Equilibrium; MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; SUPPLY CHAIN; NASH-EQUILIBRIUM; GAME; PRODUCT; NETWORK; COST;
D O I
10.1007/s00500-022-07507-9
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In recent years, equilibrium is the most generally used solution concept in game theory. This idea may be a state-of-the-art interpretation of a method game. Each player has an accurate prediction of other players' behavior and acts consistent with such a rational prediction. This paper aims to apply the game theory idea of equilibrium as a decision-making tool to develop a simple method for solving a multi-objective decision-making problem with any number of players to achieve an equilibrium point. Game theory and Nash equilibrium have been used to determine the equilibrium point of multi-objective decision-making problems of production planning in non-cooperative environments. A mixed and conditional N-player model was proposed as a development of the Nash model. The method was applied to a second-square planning problem with multiple constrained objectives (with linear constraints) in order to allocate a larger share of the sales market in a situation where all objectives were in conflict with each other. Effective solutions were first obtained using the b(l) constraint method, and then, an effective equilibrium point was extracted using the proposed method. Since the problem-solving method was discrete, the effective equilibrium point was reduced, and the results were used for making decisions about six products in the competitive market.
引用
收藏
页码:3151 / 3167
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decision-making for new technology: A multi-actor, multi-objective method
    Cunningham, Scott W.
    van der Lei, Telli E.
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2009, 76 (01) : 26 - 38
  • [32] Decision-making for new technology: A multi-actor, multi-objective method
    Cunningham, Scott W.
    van der Lei, Telli E.
    PICMET '07: PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS: MANAGEMENT OF CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2007, : 1176 - 1185
  • [33] Study on multi-objective decision-making system based on economic evaluation of mineral resources
    Wei, Yiming
    Tong, Guangxu
    Kuang Yeh/ Mining & Metallurgy, 1998, 7 (02): : 1 - 6
  • [34] Multi-objective decision-making for efficient utilization of water and fertilizer in paddy fields: A case study in Southern China
    Hua, Keji
    He, Jun
    Liao, Bin
    He, Tianzhong
    Yang, Peng
    Zhang, Lei
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2023, 289
  • [35] Multi-objective decision making by reference point theory for a wellbeing economy
    Willem Karel M. Brauers
    Operational Research, 2008, 8 (1) : 89 - 104
  • [36] Towards Many-Objective Optimization: Objective Analysis, Multi-Objective Optimization and Decision-Making
    Zheng, J. H.
    Kou, Y. N.
    Jing, Z. X.
    Wu, Q. H.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 93742 - 93751
  • [37] Hierarchical multi-objective decision making
    Univ of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
    Eur J Oper Res, 1 (155-161):
  • [38] Distributional Multi-Objective Decision Making
    Ropke, Willem
    Hayes, Conor F.
    Mannion, Patrick
    Howley, Enda
    Nowe, Ann
    Roijers, Diederik M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SECOND INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, IJCAI 2023, 2023, : 5711 - 5719
  • [39] Hierarchical multi-objective decision making
    Homburg, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1998, 105 (01) : 155 - 161
  • [40] Using soft maximin for risk averse multi-objective decision-making
    Benjamin J. Smith
    Robert Klassert
    Roland Pihlakas
    Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2023, 37