Decision-making for new technology: A multi-actor, multi-objective method

被引:8
|
作者
Cunningham, Scott W. [1 ]
van der Lei, Telli E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Technological decision-making; Exchange models; Multi-criteria decision making; Inter-firm alliances; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2008.08.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Technology managers increasingly face problems of group decision. The scale and complexity of research. development and alliance efforts in emerging fields of technology mandate as correspondingly sophisticated form of group coordination. Information technology, biotechnology and nanotechnology are good examples of sectors with complex coordination problems. Choices made include the selection of projects, the choice of investment alternatives, and the formation of technology licensing agreements. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods are often used to help decision-makers in such situations. This paper explores an approach closely related to MCDA, known as exchange modeling. Exchange modeling incorporates actor preferences, and assumptions about the play of the game, to better examine the resulting preferences of groups. The advantage of this method is that the results provide an improved prescription for strategy, given the constraints of preferences and existing alliance structures. The model is motivated based upon the needs of technology managers in new, converging fields of technology. The model is formally analyzed using operations research techniques. We then apply the model to a representative technology management problem in the converging fields of informatics, bio and nanotechnology. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 38
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision-making for new technology: A multi-actor, multi-objective method
    Cunningham, Scott W.
    van der Lei, Telli E.
    [J]. PICMET '07: PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS: MANAGEMENT OF CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2007, : 1176 - 1185
  • [2] A new multi-actor multi-attribute decision-making method to select the distribution centers' location
    Agrebi, Maroi
    Abed, Mourad
    Omri, Mohamed Nazih
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (SSCI), 2016,
  • [3] Multi-objective decision-making method of IS outsourcing
    Wang Zuzhu
    Zhou Xiaoxi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING - MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION STUDIES SECTION, 2007, : 1170 - 1175
  • [4] A multi-objective decision-making method for loan portfolio
    Guo, ZQ
    Zhou, ZF
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 1943 - 1948
  • [5] Management in Networks: On Multi-Actor Decision Making
    Kalu, Kalu N.
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2010, 70 (01) : 162 - 167
  • [6] Decision-making on Olympic urban development - A multi-actor decision support tool
    Heurkens, E. W. T. M.
    [J]. Innovations in Design & Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning, 2006, : 251 - 262
  • [7] Multi-Objective Decision-Making Method for Service Portfolio Design
    Li, Qi
    Miao, Rui
    [J]. 2019 IEEE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA), 2019, : 531 - 535
  • [8] Multi-objective decision-making for road design
    Brauers, Willem Karel M.
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Peldschus, Friedel
    Turskis, Zenonas
    [J]. TRANSPORT, 2008, 23 (03) : 183 - 193
  • [9] MULTI-OBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING IN WATER MANAGEMENT
    FLECKSEDER, H
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 13 (03) : 115 - 127
  • [10] A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Making
    Roijers, Diederik M.
    Vamplew, Peter
    Whiteson, Shimon
    Dazeley, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2013, 48 : 67 - 113