The Scleral Cap Technique for Porous and Nonporous Orbital Implants

被引:1
|
作者
Jordan, David R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp, Eye Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp, Eye Inst, 301 OConnor St, Ottawa, ON K2P 1V6, Canada
来源
关键词
ANOPHTHALMIC SOCKET; VICRYL-MESH; CORALLINE HYDROXYAPATITE; FIBROVASCULAR INGROWTH; ENUCLEATION SURGERY; AMERICAN-ACADEMY; EXPOSURE RATE; TRANSMISSION; COMPLICATIONS; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1097/IOP.0000000000002299
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose:To describe the results and potential benefit of a banked homologous donor scleral cap over the anterior surface of polyglactin 910 mesh-wrapped porous and nonporous orbital implants during enucleation and secondary orbital implant surgery. Methods:This is a single center, retrospective, clinical case series of 83 patients who received a polyglactin 910 mesh (Vicryl knitted mesh, undyed, Ethicon, Sommerville, New Jersey, USA) wrapped bioceramic or polymethylmethacrylate orbital implant (sphere or mounded) following enucleation and secondary orbital implant surgery by one surgeon over a 10-year period. A homologous donor scleral cap (approximately 1.5 x 1.5 cm diameter) was also placed over the anterior mesh-wrapped implant surface as an additional barrier. A minimum of 1-year follow up was required to be included in the study. The author analyzed patient demographics, type of surgery, implant type, implant size, follow-up duration, and presence or absence of implant exposure. The data from patients with greater than 1-year follow up are detailed in this report. Results:The author identified 100 patients in his case files that had a scleral cap put in place over their implant. Seventeen patients were either lost to follow up or did not have at least a 1-year follow up, leaving 83 patients (44 enucleations, 39 secondary implants) that were followed for 12 to 120 months (average 60.5 months). There were no cases of implant exposure identified in either group of patients during this time period. Conclusions:Implant exposure can occur anytime post implant placement with a porous or nonporous orbital implant. This review suggests that a homologous donor scleral cap (approximately 1.5 x 1.5 cm diameter) over the polyglactin 910 mesh-wrapped implant surface may help prevent implant exposure. Patients with porous and nonporous orbital implants should be followed on a long-term basis as exposure can occur at anytime postsurgery, even several years later.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 97
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] “Double scleral tunnel in tandem” technique for glaucoma drainage tube implants
    Dimitrios Brouzas
    Maria Dettoraki
    Konstantinos Andreanos
    Nikolaos Nomikarios
    Chryssanthi Koutsandrea
    Marilita M. Moschos
    International Ophthalmology, 2018, 38 : 2349 - 2356
  • [42] Late Complications of Hydrogel Scleral Buckle Implants and a Technique for Effective Removal
    Richards, Ayo-Lynn
    Meyer, Dale R.
    OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 28 (06): : 455 - 458
  • [43] "Double scleral tunnel in tandem" technique for glaucoma drainage tube implants
    Brouzas, Dimitrios
    Dettoraki, Maria
    Andreanos, Konstantinos
    Nomikarios, Nikolaos
    Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi
    Moschos, Marilita M.
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 38 (06) : 2349 - 2356
  • [44] FIXATION OF ORBITAL FLOOR IMPLANTS - DESCRIPTION OF A SIMPLE TECHNIQUE
    SMITH, B
    PUTTERMAN, AM
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1970, 83 (05) : 598 - +
  • [45] A Modified Evisceration Technique with Scleral Quadrisection and Porous Polyethylene Implantation
    Huang, Danping
    Yu, Yangyang
    Lu, Rong
    Yang, Huasheng
    Cai, Jianhao
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 147 (05) : 924 - 928
  • [46] Medpor porous polyethylene implants in orbital blowout fracture repair
    S G J Ng
    S A Madill
    C F Inkster
    A J Maloof
    B Leatherbarrow
    Eye, 2001, 15 : 578 - 582
  • [47] Porous glass-ceramic orbital implants: A feasibility study
    Baino, Francesco
    MATERIALS LETTERS, 2018, 212 : 12 - 15
  • [48] COMPARISON OF FIBROVASCULAR INGROWTH INTO HYDROXYAPATITE AND POROUS POLYETHYLENE ORBITAL IMPLANTS
    RUBIN, PAD
    POPHAM, JK
    BILYK, JR
    SHORE, JW
    OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1994, 10 (02): : 96 - 103
  • [49] Reply re: "Methods of Antibiotic Instillation in Porous Orbital Implants"
    Dolman, Peter J.
    Badilla, Jaime
    OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 25 (03): : 257 - 257
  • [50] Microstructural characterization and robust comparison of ceramic porous orbital implants
    Baino, Francesco
    Labate, Giuseppe Falvo D'Urso
    di Confiengo, Giovanna Gautier
    Faga, Maria G.
    Vitale-Brovarone, Chiara
    Catapano, Gerardo
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2018, 38 (08) : 2988 - 2993