Predictive value of immune genomic signatures from breast cancer cohorts containing data for both response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis after surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Yidan [1 ]
Iwamoto, Takayuki [2 ]
Kajiwara, Yukiko [1 ,2 ]
Takahashi, Yuko [2 ]
Kochi, Mariko [2 ]
Shien, Tadahiko [2 ]
Taira, Naruto [2 ]
Toyooka, Shinichi [1 ]
Doihara, Hiroyoshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Gen Thorac Surg & Breast & Endocrinol Surg, Kita Ku, 2-5-1 Shikata Cho, Okayama 7008558, Japan
[2] Okayama Univ Hosp, Dept Breast & Endocrine Surg, Okayama, Japan
关键词
Prognosis; Breast cancer; Response to chemotherapy; Immune genomic signatures; GENE-EXPRESSION; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1007/s12282-022-01397-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Previous studies of immune genomic signatures (IGSs) in breast cancer have attempted to predict the response to chemotherapy or prognosis and were performed using different patient cohorts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive functions of various IGSs using the same patient cohort that included data for response to chemotherapy as well as the prognosis after surgery. Methods We applied five previously described IGS models in a public dataset of 508 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The prognostic and predictive values of each model were evaluated, and their correlations were compared. Results We observed a high proportion of expression concordance among the IGS models (r: 0.56-1). Higher scores of IGSs were detected in aggressive breast cancer subtypes (basal and HER2-enriched) (P < 0.001). Four of the five IGSs could predict chemotherapy responses and two could predict 5-year relapse-free survival in cases with hormone receptor-positive (HR +) tumors. However, the models showed no significant differences in their predictive abilities for hormone receptor-negative (HR-) tumors. Conclusions IGSs are, to some extent, useful for predicting prognosis and chemotherapy response; moreover, they show substantial agreement for specific breast cancer subtypes. However, it is necessary to identify more compelling biomarkers for both prognosis and response to chemotherapy in HR- and HER2 + cases.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 67
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Radiogenomic analysis of HER2+breast cancer reveals MRI features correlated with genomic immune index are predictive of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response
    Braman, Nathaniel
    Prasanna, Prateek
    Singh, Salendra
    Beig, Niha
    Gilmore, Hannah
    Etesami, Maryam
    Bates, David
    Gallagher, Katie
    Bloch, B. Nicolas
    Somlo, George
    Sikov, William
    Harris, Lyndsay
    Plecha, Donna
    Varadan, Vinay
    Madabhushi, Anant
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (04)
  • [42] Predictive value of the pattern of β-catenin expression for pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.
    Elsamany, Shereef
    Elemam, Omaima
    Alzahrani, Abdullah Saeed
    Abbas, Mohammed M.
    Elmorsy, Soha
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [43] Predictive value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy failure in breast cancer using FDG–PET after the first course
    Hélène Kolesnikov-Gauthier
    Laurence Vanlemmens
    Marie-Christine Baranzelli
    Philippe Vennin
    Véronique Servent
    Charles Fournier
    Philippe Carpentier
    Jacques Bonneterre
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2012, 131 : 517 - 525
  • [44] PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR COMPLETE PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSE AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN BREAST CANCER. RESULTS FROM A SINGLE INSTITUTION
    Pons, V.
    Perez-Fidalgo, J. A.
    Roda, D.
    Bermejo, B.
    Burgues, O.
    Bosch, A.
    Martinez-Ruiz, F.
    Ferrer, J.
    Lluch, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 : 88 - 89
  • [45] Mucin-1 protein and mRNA expression in breast cancer: Predictive value for therapy response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Sinn, Bruno Valentin
    Von Minckwitz, Gunter
    Denkert, Carsten
    Eidtmann, Holger
    Darb-Esfahani, Silvia
    Belau, Antje
    Kronenwett, Ralf
    Holzhausen, Hans-Juergen
    Mehta, Keyur
    Loibl, Sibylle
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [46] Breast conserving therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; data from the Dutch Breast Cancer Audit
    Spronk, Pauline E. R.
    Volders, Jose H.
    van den Tol, Petrousjka
    Smorenburg, Carolien H.
    Peeters, Marie-Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken
    EJSO, 2019, 45 (02): : 110 - 117
  • [47] Radiomic signatures derived from multiparametric MRI for the pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Bian, Tiantian
    Wu, Zengjie
    Lin, Qing
    Wang, Haibo
    Ge, Yaqiong
    Duan, Shaofeng
    Fu, Guangming
    Cui, Chunxiao
    Su, Xiaohui
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1115):
  • [48] Predictive value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy failure in breast cancer using FDG-PET after the first course
    Kolesnikov-Gauthier, Helene
    Vanlemmens, Laurence
    Baranzelli, Marie-Christine
    Vennin, Philippe
    Servent, Veronique
    Fournier, Charles
    Carpentier, Philippe
    Bonneterre, Jacques
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 131 (02) : 517 - 525
  • [49] Predictive value of tumor response rate for axillary response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer
    Kim, H. S.
    Eom, Y. H.
    Yoo, T. K.
    Song, B. J.
    Chae, B. J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27
  • [50] Gene signatures as potential predictive markers of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+/HER2+breast cancer patients
    Risi, E.
    Grilli, A.
    Migliaccio, I.
    Biagioni, C.
    Guarducci, C.
    Bonechi, M.
    McCartney, A.
    Vitale, S.
    Biganzoli, L.
    Bicciato, S.
    Di Leo, A.
    Malorni, L.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28