Predictive value of immune genomic signatures from breast cancer cohorts containing data for both response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis after surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Yidan [1 ]
Iwamoto, Takayuki [2 ]
Kajiwara, Yukiko [1 ,2 ]
Takahashi, Yuko [2 ]
Kochi, Mariko [2 ]
Shien, Tadahiko [2 ]
Taira, Naruto [2 ]
Toyooka, Shinichi [1 ]
Doihara, Hiroyoshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Okayama Univ, Grad Sch Med Dent & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Gen Thorac Surg & Breast & Endocrinol Surg, Kita Ku, 2-5-1 Shikata Cho, Okayama 7008558, Japan
[2] Okayama Univ Hosp, Dept Breast & Endocrine Surg, Okayama, Japan
关键词
Prognosis; Breast cancer; Response to chemotherapy; Immune genomic signatures; GENE-EXPRESSION; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1007/s12282-022-01397-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Previous studies of immune genomic signatures (IGSs) in breast cancer have attempted to predict the response to chemotherapy or prognosis and were performed using different patient cohorts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive functions of various IGSs using the same patient cohort that included data for response to chemotherapy as well as the prognosis after surgery. Methods We applied five previously described IGS models in a public dataset of 508 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The prognostic and predictive values of each model were evaluated, and their correlations were compared. Results We observed a high proportion of expression concordance among the IGS models (r: 0.56-1). Higher scores of IGSs were detected in aggressive breast cancer subtypes (basal and HER2-enriched) (P < 0.001). Four of the five IGSs could predict chemotherapy responses and two could predict 5-year relapse-free survival in cases with hormone receptor-positive (HR +) tumors. However, the models showed no significant differences in their predictive abilities for hormone receptor-negative (HR-) tumors. Conclusions IGSs are, to some extent, useful for predicting prognosis and chemotherapy response; moreover, they show substantial agreement for specific breast cancer subtypes. However, it is necessary to identify more compelling biomarkers for both prognosis and response to chemotherapy in HR- and HER2 + cases.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 67
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence of different response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on time of surgery in breast cancer patients
    Darko Zdravkovic
    Simona Petricevic
    Borislav Toskovic
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2021, 187 : 299 - 299
  • [32] Influence of different response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on time of surgery in breast cancer patients
    Zdravkovic, Darko
    Petricevic, Simona
    Toskovic, Borislav
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 187 (01) : 299 - 299
  • [33] Predictive factors and prognostic value of pathologic complete response of ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph nodes in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Zhu, Jiujun
    Jiao, Dechuang
    Guo, Xuhui
    Qiao, Jianghua
    Ma, Youzhao
    Zhang, Jingyang
    Chen, Hui
    Xiao, Hui
    Yang, Yue
    Lu, Zhenduo
    Liu, Zhenzhen
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (22)
  • [34] Predictive factors for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: inflammatory and immune markers in triple-negative breast cancer
    Hiroki Kusama
    Nobuyoshi Kittaka
    Ai Soma
    Azusa Taniguchi
    Haruka Kanaoka
    Satomi Nakajima
    Yuri Oyama
    Yukiko Seto
    Jun Okuno
    Noriyuki Watanabe
    Saki Matsui
    Minako Nishio
    Fumie Fujisawa
    Keiichiro Honma
    Yasuhiro Tamaki
    Takahiro Nakayama
    Breast Cancer, 2023, 30 (6) : 1085 - 1093
  • [35] Mammographic density is a potential predictive marker of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Skarping, Ida
    Fornvik, Daniel
    Sartor, Hanna
    Heide-Jorgensen, Uffe
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    Borgquist, Signe
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [36] Mammographic density is a potential predictive marker of pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Ida Skarping
    Daniel Förnvik
    Hanna Sartor
    Uffe Heide-Jørgensen
    Sophia Zackrisson
    Signe Borgquist
    BMC Cancer, 19
  • [37] Are there predictive factors for a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer?
    Warm, M.
    Cramer, E-M
    Bosse, K.
    Moers, C.
    Thomas, A.
    Mallmann, P.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2006, 100 : S154 - S154
  • [38] Predictive factors for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: inflammatory and immune markers in triple-negative breast cancer
    Kusama, Hiroki
    Kittaka, Nobuyoshi
    Soma, Ai
    Taniguchi, Azusa
    Kanaoka, Haruka
    Nakajima, Satomi
    Oyama, Yuri
    Seto, Yukiko
    Okuno, Jun
    Watanabe, Noriyuki
    Matsui, Saki
    Nishio, Minako
    Fujisawa, Fumie
    Honma, Keiichiro
    Tamaki, Yasuhiro
    Nakayama, Takahiro
    BREAST CANCER, 2023, 30 (06) : 1085 - 1093
  • [39] A Predictive Model for Axillary Node Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
    Kantor, Olga
    Sipsy, Lynn McNulty
    Yao, Katharine
    James, Ted A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (05) : 1304 - 1311
  • [40] A Predictive Model for Axillary Node Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
    Olga Kantor
    Lynn McNulty Sipsy
    Katharine Yao
    Ted A. James
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 1304 - 1311