Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness of Correcting Different Types of Astigmatism with Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

被引:2
|
作者
Igras, Estera [1 ]
Czarnota-Nowakowska, Barbara [2 ]
O'Caoimh, Ronan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Optegra Eye Hlth Care Laser Clin, Mickiewicza St 140, PL-71153 Szczecin, Poland
[2] Optegra Eye Hlth Care Laser Clin, PL-61101 Poznan, Poland
[3] Mercy Univ Hosp, Dept Geriatr Med, Grenville Pl, Cork T12 WE28, Ireland
[4] Univ Coll Cork, Mercy Univ Hosp, Clin Res Facil Cork, Cork T12 WE28, Ireland
关键词
myopia; astigmatism; refractive surgery; Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE); long-term effectiveness; MYOPIC ASTIGMATISM; PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES; SMILE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12216941
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Few studies have reported the differential outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) on myopic astigmatism. Given this, we examined the effectiveness of SMILE for up to one year, comparing with-the-rule (WTR), against-the-rule (ATR), and oblique astigmatism, conducting a retrospective review of patients who underwent correction of myopic astigmatism using the 500-kHz VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) at two refractive clinics in Poland between 2016-2017. Patients were aged >= 21 with stable refractive errors between -0.5 and -10.0 diopter (D) with astigmatism up to 5D. The mean age of the 209 patients (355 eyes) available was 32 years; 58.4% were female. Of these, 247 had WTR, 62 oblique, and 46 ATR astigmatism. The mean pre-operative spherical equivalent (SE) was -5.4 +/- 2.57D and the cylinder -1.7 +/- 1.0D. The mean SE for WTR reduced from -5.60 +/- 2.37D to -0.31 +/- 0.67D at 2 months and -0.38 +/- 0.70D at 12 months; the mean cylinder improved from -1.90 +/- 1.10D to -0.31 +/- 0.39D and -0.36 +/- 0.43D, respectively. Eyes with oblique astigmatism also improved from a mean SE of -5.8 +/- 3.4 D to -0.82 +/- 1.50D and -0.69 +/- 1.15D and a cylinder of -1.4 +/- 0.73D to -0.17 +/- 0.33D at 2 months and -0.1 +/- 0.32D at 12. For ATR, the mean SE improved from -4.0 +/- 1.8D to -0.08 +/- 0.22D and -0.04 +/- 0.12D; and the mean cylinder from -1.25 +/- 0.53 to -0.02 +/- 0.09D -0.08 +/- 0.21D at 2 and 12 months, respectively. There were statistically significant improvements in SE, manifest sphere and cylinder refraction, and UDVA and CDVA scores for each cylinder type at 2 months with ATR cylinders having better outcomes. Although missing data limited interpretation at one year, differences were maintained. The magnitude of error calculations suggests that WTR was more prone to under-correction, particularly for high astigmatism (>1.5D). SMILE for myopic astigmatism reliably corrects SE, irrespective of the subtype of astigmatism.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Topography-guided Photorefractive Keratectomy for Irregular Astigmatism After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction
    Ivarsen, Anders
    Hjortdal, Jesper O.
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 30 (06) : 429 - 432
  • [42] Visual and keratometric outcomes in eyes undergoing small incision lenticule extraction for compound myopic astigmatism
    Soliman, Ashraf H.
    JOURNAL OF THE EGYPTIAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 112 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [43] Efficacy of small-incision lenticule extraction surgery in high astigmatism: A meta-analysis
    Cui, Ge
    Di, Yu
    Yang, Shan
    Chen, Di
    Li, Ying
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 9
  • [44] Comparison of femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to correct myopic astigmatism
    Qian, Yishan
    Huang, Jia
    Zhou, Xingtao
    Wang, Yutung
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 41 (11): : 2476 - 2486
  • [45] Comparison between aberration-free transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism
    Zheng, Zhiyuan
    Zhang, Mingzhi
    Jhanji, Vishal
    Sun, Lixia
    Li, Jinyu
    Zhang, Riping
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 41 (01) : 303 - 314
  • [46] Comparison between aberration-free transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism
    Zhiyuan Zheng
    Mingzhi Zhang
    Vishal Jhanji
    Lixia Sun
    Jinyu Li
    Riping Zhang
    International Ophthalmology, 2021, 41 : 303 - 314
  • [47] Effectiveness and the nomogram of small incision lenticule extraction in the correction of myopic anisometropia in adults
    Zhang, Tong
    Zhu, Lu
    Zuo, Hang-Jia
    Chen, Zhi-Jun
    Ji, Yan
    Yang, Xin
    Lu, Xiao-Rong
    Wu, Qiong
    Wang, Qing
    Xia, Jiu-Yi
    Li, Meng
    Zhou, Chun-Jiang
    Wang, Yao
    Hu, Ke
    Wan, Wen-Juan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 16 (11) : 1838 - 1844
  • [48] A comparison of the effects of different cap thicknesses on corneal nerve destruction after small incision lenticule extraction
    Weiming Yang
    Meiyan Li
    Dan Fu
    Ruoyan Wei
    Chuanbo Cui
    Xingtao Zhou
    International Ophthalmology, 2020, 40 : 1905 - 1911
  • [49] A review of small incision lenticule extraction complications
    Krueger, Ronald R.
    Meister, Caio S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 29 (04) : 293 - 299
  • [50] Limitations of SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction)
    Seiler, T.
    Koller, T.
    Wittwer, V. V.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2017, 234 (01) : 125 - 129