Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness of Correcting Different Types of Astigmatism with Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

被引:2
|
作者
Igras, Estera [1 ]
Czarnota-Nowakowska, Barbara [2 ]
O'Caoimh, Ronan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Optegra Eye Hlth Care Laser Clin, Mickiewicza St 140, PL-71153 Szczecin, Poland
[2] Optegra Eye Hlth Care Laser Clin, PL-61101 Poznan, Poland
[3] Mercy Univ Hosp, Dept Geriatr Med, Grenville Pl, Cork T12 WE28, Ireland
[4] Univ Coll Cork, Mercy Univ Hosp, Clin Res Facil Cork, Cork T12 WE28, Ireland
关键词
myopia; astigmatism; refractive surgery; Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE); long-term effectiveness; MYOPIC ASTIGMATISM; PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES; SMILE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12216941
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Few studies have reported the differential outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) on myopic astigmatism. Given this, we examined the effectiveness of SMILE for up to one year, comparing with-the-rule (WTR), against-the-rule (ATR), and oblique astigmatism, conducting a retrospective review of patients who underwent correction of myopic astigmatism using the 500-kHz VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) at two refractive clinics in Poland between 2016-2017. Patients were aged >= 21 with stable refractive errors between -0.5 and -10.0 diopter (D) with astigmatism up to 5D. The mean age of the 209 patients (355 eyes) available was 32 years; 58.4% were female. Of these, 247 had WTR, 62 oblique, and 46 ATR astigmatism. The mean pre-operative spherical equivalent (SE) was -5.4 +/- 2.57D and the cylinder -1.7 +/- 1.0D. The mean SE for WTR reduced from -5.60 +/- 2.37D to -0.31 +/- 0.67D at 2 months and -0.38 +/- 0.70D at 12 months; the mean cylinder improved from -1.90 +/- 1.10D to -0.31 +/- 0.39D and -0.36 +/- 0.43D, respectively. Eyes with oblique astigmatism also improved from a mean SE of -5.8 +/- 3.4 D to -0.82 +/- 1.50D and -0.69 +/- 1.15D and a cylinder of -1.4 +/- 0.73D to -0.17 +/- 0.33D at 2 months and -0.1 +/- 0.32D at 12. For ATR, the mean SE improved from -4.0 +/- 1.8D to -0.08 +/- 0.22D and -0.04 +/- 0.12D; and the mean cylinder from -1.25 +/- 0.53 to -0.02 +/- 0.09D -0.08 +/- 0.21D at 2 and 12 months, respectively. There were statistically significant improvements in SE, manifest sphere and cylinder refraction, and UDVA and CDVA scores for each cylinder type at 2 months with ATR cylinders having better outcomes. Although missing data limited interpretation at one year, differences were maintained. The magnitude of error calculations suggests that WTR was more prone to under-correction, particularly for high astigmatism (>1.5D). SMILE for myopic astigmatism reliably corrects SE, irrespective of the subtype of astigmatism.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Complications of small incision lenticule extraction
    Asif, Mohamed Ibrahime
    Bafna, Rahul Kumar
    Mehta, Jodhbir Singh
    Reddy, Jagadesh
    Titiyal, Jeewan Singh
    Maharana, Prafulla K.
    Sharma, Namrata
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 68 (12) : 2711 - 2722
  • [32] New Instruments for Lenticule Extraction in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)
    Liu, Yu-Chi
    Pujara, Tarak
    Mehta, Jodhbir S.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12):
  • [33] Small-incision lenticule extraction
    Moshirfar, Majid
    McCaughey, Michael V.
    Reinstein, Dan Z.
    Shah, Rupal
    Santiago-Caban, Luis
    Fenzl, Carlton R.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 41 (03): : 652 - 665
  • [34] SMILE - Small Incision Lenticule Extraction
    Steinwender, Gernot
    Shajari, Mehdi
    Mayer, Wolfgang J.
    Kook, Daniel
    Dirisamer, Martin
    Kohnen, Thomas
    AUGENHEILKUNDE UP2DATE, 2020, 10 (04) : 375 - 392
  • [35] SMILE - Small Incision Lenticule Extraction
    Steinwender, Gernot
    Shajari, Mehdi
    Mayer, Wolfgang J.
    Kook, Daniel
    Dirisamer, Martin
    Kohnen, Thomas
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2020, 237 (12) : E15 - E34
  • [36] small-incision lenticule extraction
    Taneri, Suphi
    Arba-Mosquera, Samuel
    Rost, Anika
    Hansson, Caroline
    Dick, H. Burkhard
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 47 (04): : 439 - 444
  • [37] Reply to comment on: Comparison of clinical outcomes between vector planning and manifest refraction planning in small-incision lenticule extraction for myopic astigmatism
    Reinstein, Dan
    Archer, Timothy J.
    Yong Kang, David Sung
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 47 (01): : 142 - 143
  • [38] Lenticuloschisis: A "No Dissection" Technique for Lenticule Extraction in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction
    Ganesh, Sri
    Brar, Sheetal
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 33 (08) : 563 - 566
  • [39] Comparison Between Q-Adjusted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism
    El-Mayah, Esraa
    Anis, Mohamed
    Salem, Mohsen
    Pinero, David
    Hosny, Mohamed
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 44 : S426 - S432
  • [40] Comparison of different corneal residual bed thickness after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)
    Ouyang, Bo-wen
    Ding, Hui
    Fan, Hongming
    Wang, Han
    Yang, Zhenduo
    Zhong, Tan
    Zhong, Xingwu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 34 (02) : 384 - 393