Prediction performance of the machine learning model in predicting mortality risk in patients with traumatic brain injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Jue [1 ]
Yin, Ming Jing [1 ]
Wen, Han Chun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Emergency, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Intens Care Dept, Ward 1,6 Shuangyong Rd, Nanning, Guangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Machine learning; Traumatic brain injury; Meta-analysis; Prediction; Mortality rate; Systematic review; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; DECISION-TREE ANALYSIS; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; REGRESSION-MODELS; IMPACT; CRASH; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-023-02247-8
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeWith the in-depth application of machine learning(ML) in clinical practice, it has been used to predict the mortality risk in patients with traumatic brain injuries(TBI). However, there are disputes over its predictive accuracy. Therefore, we implemented this systematic review and meta-analysis, to explore the predictive value of ML for TBI.MethodologyWe systematically retrieved literature published in PubMed, Embase.com, Cochrane, and Web of Science as of November 27, 2022. The prediction model risk of bias(ROB) assessment tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the ROB of models and the applicability of reviewed questions. The random-effects model was adopted for the meta-analysis of the C-index and accuracy of ML models, and a bivariate mixed-effects model for the meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity.ResultA total of 47 papers were eligible, including 156 model, with 122 newly developed ML models and 34 clinically recommended mature tools. There were 98 ML models predicting the in-hospital mortality in patients with TBI; the pooled C-index, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.87), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.82), and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.92), respectively. There were 24 ML models predicting the out-of-hospital mortality; the pooled C-index, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.85), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.81), and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.82), respectively. According to multivariate analysis, GCS score, age, CT classification, pupil size/light reflex, glucose, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) exerted the greatest impact on the model performance.ConclusionAccording to the systematic review and meta-analysis, ML models are relatively accurate in predicting the mortality of TBI. A single model often outperforms traditional scoring tools, but the pooled accuracy of models is close to that of traditional scoring tools. The key factors related to model performance include the accepted clinical variables of TBI and the use of CT imaging.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance
    Debray, Thomas P. A.
    Damen, Johanna A. A. G.
    Snell, Kym I. E.
    Ensor, Joie
    Hooft, Lotty
    Reitsma, Johannes B.
    Riley, Richard D.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356
  • [32] Distinguishing glioblastoma from brain metastasis; a systematic review and meta-analysis on the performance of machine learning
    Habibi, Mohammad Amin
    Omid, Reza
    Asgarzade, Shafaq
    Derakhshandeh, Sadaf
    Farsani, Ali Soltani
    Tajabadi, Zohreh
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 40 (01)
  • [33] Effect of prehospital intubation on mortality rates in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ji, Fang
    Zhou, Xiaohui
    SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 68 (03) : 80 - 90
  • [34] Impact of intracranial pressure monitoring on mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yuan, Qiang
    Wu, Xing
    Sun, Yirui
    Yu, Jian
    Li, Zhiqi
    Du, Zhuoying
    Mao, Ying
    Zhou, Liangfu
    Hu, Jin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 122 (03) : 574 - 587
  • [35] In-hospital mortality and risk factors among elderly patients with traumatic brain injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Zixuan
    Hui, Jiyuan
    Yang, Chun
    Jiang, Jiyao
    Xie, Li
    Feng, Junfeng
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [36] Predicting paediatric asthma exacerbations with machine learning: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Votto, Martina
    De Silvestri, Annalisa
    Postiglione, Lorenzo
    De Filippo, Maria
    Manti, Sara
    La Grutta, Stefania
    Marseglia, Gian Luigi
    Licari, Amelia
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2024, 33 (174):
  • [37] The performance of machine learning models in predicting suicidal ideation, attempts, and deaths: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Kusuma, Karen
    Larsen, Mark
    Quiroz, Juan C.
    Gillies, Malcolm
    Burnett, Alexander
    Qian, Jiahui
    Torok, Michelle
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2022, 155 : 579 - 588
  • [38] Machine learning for prediction of asthma exacerbations among asthmatic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shiqiu Xiong
    Wei Chen
    Xinyu Jia
    Yang Jia
    Chuanhe Liu
    BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 23
  • [39] Machine learning prediction of motor function in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Qinglin
    Chi, Lei
    Zhao, Weiying
    Wu, Lei
    Jiao, Chuanxu
    Zheng, Xue
    Zhang, Kaiyue
    Li, Xiaoning
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [40] Machine learning for prediction of asthma exacerbations among asthmatic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiong, Shiqiu
    Chen, Wei
    Jia, Xinyu
    Jia, Yang
    Liu, Chuanhe
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (01)