Prediction performance of the machine learning model in predicting mortality risk in patients with traumatic brain injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Jue [1 ]
Yin, Ming Jing [1 ]
Wen, Han Chun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Emergency, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Intens Care Dept, Ward 1,6 Shuangyong Rd, Nanning, Guangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Machine learning; Traumatic brain injury; Meta-analysis; Prediction; Mortality rate; Systematic review; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; DECISION-TREE ANALYSIS; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; GLASGOW COMA SCALE; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; REGRESSION-MODELS; IMPACT; CRASH; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-023-02247-8
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeWith the in-depth application of machine learning(ML) in clinical practice, it has been used to predict the mortality risk in patients with traumatic brain injuries(TBI). However, there are disputes over its predictive accuracy. Therefore, we implemented this systematic review and meta-analysis, to explore the predictive value of ML for TBI.MethodologyWe systematically retrieved literature published in PubMed, Embase.com, Cochrane, and Web of Science as of November 27, 2022. The prediction model risk of bias(ROB) assessment tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the ROB of models and the applicability of reviewed questions. The random-effects model was adopted for the meta-analysis of the C-index and accuracy of ML models, and a bivariate mixed-effects model for the meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity.ResultA total of 47 papers were eligible, including 156 model, with 122 newly developed ML models and 34 clinically recommended mature tools. There were 98 ML models predicting the in-hospital mortality in patients with TBI; the pooled C-index, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.87), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.82), and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.92), respectively. There were 24 ML models predicting the out-of-hospital mortality; the pooled C-index, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.85), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.81), and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.82), respectively. According to multivariate analysis, GCS score, age, CT classification, pupil size/light reflex, glucose, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) exerted the greatest impact on the model performance.ConclusionAccording to the systematic review and meta-analysis, ML models are relatively accurate in predicting the mortality of TBI. A single model often outperforms traditional scoring tools, but the pooled accuracy of models is close to that of traditional scoring tools. The key factors related to model performance include the accepted clinical variables of TBI and the use of CT imaging.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine learning for the prediction of mortality in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lv, Xiangui
    Liu, Daiqiang
    Chen, Xinwei
    Chen, Lvlin
    Wang, Xiaohui
    Xu, Xiaomei
    Chen, Lin
    Huang, Chao
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [22] Risk prediction models for maternal mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aoyama, Kazuyoshi
    D'Souza, Rohan
    Pinto, Ruxandra
    Ray, Joel G.
    Hill, Andrea
    Scales, Damon C.
    Lapinsky, Stephen E.
    Seaward, Gareth R.
    Hladunewich, Michelle
    Shah, Prakesh S.
    Fowler, Robert A.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12):
  • [23] Predicting neurological outcome in adult patients with cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance
    Simon A. Amacher
    René Blatter
    Matthias Briel
    Christian Appenzeller-Herzog
    Chantal Bohren
    Christoph Becker
    Katharina Beck
    Sebastian Gross
    Kai Tisljar
    Raoul Sutter
    Stephan Marsch
    Sabina Hunziker
    Critical Care, 26
  • [24] Machine learning for prediction of viral hepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Moulaei, Khadijeh
    Sharifi, Hamid
    Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
    Haghdoost, Ali Akbar
    Nasiri, Naser
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 179
  • [25] Predicting neurological outcome in adult patients with cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance
    Amacher, Simon A.
    Blatter, Rene
    Briel, Matthias
    Appenzeller-Herzog, Christian
    Bohren, Chantal
    Becker, Christoph
    Beck, Katharina
    Gross, Sebastian
    Tisljar, Kai
    Sutter, Raoul
    Marsch, Stephan
    Hunziker, Sabina
    CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 26 (01)
  • [26] Early prediction of ventilator-associated pneumonia with machine learning models: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance
    Frondelius, Tuomas
    Atkova, Irina
    Miettunen, Jouko
    Rello, Jordi
    Vesty, Gillian
    Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn
    Jansson, Miia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 121 : 76 - 87
  • [27] Comparing logistic regression and machine learning for obesity risk prediction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Boakye, Nancy Fosua
    O'Toole, Ciaran Courtney
    Jalali, Amirhossein
    Hannigan, Ailish
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2025, 199
  • [28] Treatment with Rapamycin in Animal Models of Traumatic Brain Injuries; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kiah, Mohammad
    Azimi, Amir
    Hajisoltani, Razieh
    Yousefifard, Mahmoud
    ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [29] Risk factors for predicting mortality of COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Lan
    Jin, Jing
    Luo, Wenxin
    Gan, Yuncui
    Chen, Bojiang
    Li, Weimin
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (11):
  • [30] Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries and Future Risk of Developing Alzheimer's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Graham, Alicia
    Livingston, Gill
    Purnell, Lucy
    Huntley, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2022, 87 (03) : 969 - 979