Does Head and Neck Posture Affect Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of the Upper Airway?

被引:4
|
作者
Coppelson, Kevin [1 ,8 ]
Summersgill, Isabella [1 ]
Hatcher, David [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Nguyen, Gloria [1 ]
Pada, Hilary [1 ]
Stewart, Hal [1 ]
Herre, Tim [1 ]
Hansen, Michael [1 ]
Zaghi, Soroush [1 ]
机构
[1] Breathe Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Pacific, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Dent, Orofacial Sci, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Dent, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Surg & Radiol Sci, Davis, CA USA
[6] Diagnost Digital Imaging, Sacramento, CA USA
[7] BeamReaders, Kennewick, WA USA
[8] Breathe Inst, 10921 Wilshire Blvd Suite 912, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP-APNEA; CEPHALOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS; LATERAL CEPHALOGRAMS; CLASS-II; DIMENSIONS; POSITION; VOLUME; SNORERS; UPRIGHT; TONGUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2023.01.016
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Radiographic analysis is often used as a screening tool to assess for risk of sleep-related breath-ing disorders. This study aimed to address 2 questions: (1) Does head posture significantly affect the min-imum cross-sectional area (MCA)? and (2) Is the NBC3 (nasion-basion-C3) angle a reliable measurement to control for alteration of head position in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans? Methods: Study design: prospective cohort study. Setting: Private practices affiliated with a research institution. Participants: convenience sample of adult volunteers. Variables: CBCT scans were taken in 2 conditions: baseline (natural head position, NHP) and 1 of 5 experimental conditions (head tilted up, head tilted down, sitting vs standing, use of chin-rest, and swallow variation). For the primary aim of our study, the primary predictor variable was head posture and the main outcome variable was percentage change in MCA. For the secondary aim, the primary predictor variable was head posture and the main outcome variable was degree change in NBC3 angle. Results: Ninety subjects were included (age 40.7 ⠂ 13.7 years, 70% female). Mean NBC3 at baseline was 112.4 ⠂ 8.3 ⠃. Head tilted down significantly decreased (⠄41.4 ⠂ 18.5 mm2, P = .03*) and head tilted up significantly increased MCA (+147.4 ⠂ 43.3 mm2, P = .0018*). Head tilted down significantly reduced the NBC3 angle measurement (⠄10.5 ⠂ 6.8 ⠃, P = .006) and head tilted up significantly increased the NBC3 angle measurement (+14.4 ⠂ 5.8 ⠃, P = .0004). A quadratic regression model was fitted with moderately strong correlation (R2 = 0.54) showing an exponential effect of small changes in the NBC3 angle on MCA, P < .0001. The model predicts that increasing NBC3 by +5 and + 10 ⠃ resulted in MCA changes of +25% and +88%, whereas a decrease in NBC3 by ⠄5 and ⠄10 ⠃ results in MCA changes of ⠄21% and ⠄23%, respectively.Conclusion: Alterations in head posture significantly affect the MCA of the upper airway on CBCT. The NBC3 angle can be used to reliably assess changes in cranio-cervical extension and validate comparisons of MCA between CBCT scans for the same patient. A standardized protocol for CBCT acquisition is proposed.& COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 733
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] REPLY: DOES HEAD AND NECK POSTURE AFFECT CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ASSESSMENT OF THE UPPER AIRWAY?
    Coppelson, Kevin
    Zaghi, Soroush
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 81 (07) : 804 - 805
  • [2] Reliability of a method to conduct upper airway analysis in cone-beam computed tomography
    Siqueira de Souza, Karen Regina
    Pedron Oltramari-Navarro, Paula Vanessa
    Navarro, Ricardo de Lima
    de Castro Ferreira Conti, Ana Claudia
    de Almeida, Marcio Rodrigues
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2013, 27 (01): : 48 - 54
  • [3] Metal Artifact Reduction in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Head and Neck Radiotherapy
    Korpics, Mark
    Johnson, Paul
    Patel, Rakesh
    Surucu, Murat
    Choi, Mehee
    Emami, Bahman
    Roeske, John C.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2016, 15 (06) : NP88 - NP94
  • [4] Cone-beam computed tomography of the head in standing equids
    Bregger, M. D. Klopfenstein
    Koch, C.
    Zimmermann, R.
    Sangiorgio, D.
    Schweizer-Gorgas, D.
    BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2019, 15 (01)
  • [5] Comparative analysis of upper airway volume with lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography
    Feng, Xin
    Li, Gang
    Qu, Zhenyu
    Liu, Lin
    Nasstrom, Karin
    Shi, Xie-Qi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 147 (02) : 197 - 204
  • [6] Reliability of upper airway linear, area, and volumetric measurements in cone-beam computed tomography
    Mattos, Claudia Trindade
    Cruz, Christiane Vasconcellos
    Sobreira da Matta, Thais Cristina
    Pereira, Leonardo de Abreu
    Solon-de-Mello, Priscilla de Almeida
    de Oliveira Ruellas, Antonio Carlos
    Sant'Anna, Eduardo Franzotti
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2014, 145 (02) : 188 - 197
  • [7] Cone-beam computed tomography of the head in standing equids
    M. D. Klopfenstein Bregger
    C. Koch
    R. Zimmermann
    D. Sangiorgio
    D. Schweizer-Gorgas
    BMC Veterinary Research, 15
  • [8] An Investigation on the Acquisition and Modification of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images for Head and Neck Cancer
    Hu, C.
    Wu, J.
    Chao, H.
    Tsai, C.
    Wang, C.
    Cheng, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [9] Upper airway imaging in sleep-disordered breathing: role of cone-beam computed tomography
    Alsufyani, Noura A.
    Noga, Michelle L.
    Witmans, Manisha
    Major, Paul W.
    ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 33 (03) : 161 - 169
  • [10] Upper airway imaging in sleep-disordered breathing: role of cone-beam computed tomography
    Noura A. Alsufyani
    Michelle L. Noga
    Manisha Witmans
    Paul W. Major
    Oral Radiology, 2017, 33 : 161 - 169