Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a prospective trial-based economic evaluation

被引:7
|
作者
Lu, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Dong [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Jiao-bao [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Jia [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Bin-bin [1 ,2 ]
Xue, Zhen [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Hua-Long [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Guo-sheng [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Li-li [1 ,2 ]
Li, Ping [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jia-Bin [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Jian-Xian [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Qi-Yue [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Long-Long [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Jian-Wei [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Chao-Hui [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Chang-Ming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Dept Gastr Surg, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Robotic; Cost-effectiveness; Gastrectomy; Gastric cancer; OF-LIFE OUTCOMES; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-023-10147-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
ImportanceIt is largely unclear whether robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) is cost-effective for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RDG, laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG), and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for patients with LAGC.Design, setting, and participantsInverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics. A decision-analytic model was constructed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RDG, LDG, and ODG.ExposuresRDG, LDG, and ODG.Main outcomes and measuresIncremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life year (QALY).ResultsThis pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials included 449 patients: 117, 254, and 78 patients in the RDG, LDG, and ODG groups, respectively. After IPTW, RDG demonstrated its priority in terms of less blood loss, postoperative length, and complication rate (all P < 0.05). RDG also showed higher QOL with more cost, representing an ICER of $85,739.73 per QALY and $42,189.53 per QALY compared to LDG and ODG, respectively. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, RDG achieved the best cost-effectiveness for patients with LAGC only when the willingness-to-pay threshold was > $85,739.73 per QALY, which significantly exceeded 3 times Chinese per capita GDP. Furthermore, one of the most important factors was the indirect costs of robotic surgery in terms of the cost-effectiveness of RDG compared to that of LDG or ODG.Conclusions and relevanceAlthough improved short-term outcomes and QOL were seen in patients underwent RDG, the economic burden should be considered in the clinical decision-making regarding robotic surgery use for patients with LAGC. Our findings may vary in different health care settings and affordability.Trial registration CLASS-01 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, CT01609309) and FUGES-011 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03313700).
引用
收藏
页码:7472 / 7485
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: safety and short-term oncologic results
    Ziyu Li
    Fei Shan
    Yinkui Wang
    Shuangxi Li
    Yongning Jia
    Lianhai Zhang
    Daoxin Yin
    Jiafu Ji
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 4265 - 4271
  • [42] Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for early distal gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
    Liang, Yichao
    Li, Guoxin
    Chen, Pingyan
    Yu, Jiang
    Zhang, Ce
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 81 (10) : 673 - 680
  • [43] Safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer
    Tian, Yuan
    Guo, Honghai
    Hu, Yiyang
    Yang, Peigang
    Liu, Yang
    Zhang, Ze
    Ding, Pingan
    Zheng, Tao
    Fan, Liqiao
    Zhang, Zhidong
    Li, Yong
    Zhao, Qun
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (09): : 6761 - 6770
  • [44] Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of prospective observational studies
    Zheng Bobo
    Wang Xin
    Li Jiang
    Wang Quan
    Bi Liang
    Deng Xiangbing
    Wang Ziqiang
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (04): : 1033 - 1048
  • [45] Safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer
    Yuan Tian
    Honghai Guo
    Yiyang Hu
    Peigang Yang
    Yang Liu
    Ze Zhang
    Pingan Ding
    Tao Zheng
    Liqiao Fan
    Zhidong Zhang
    Yong Li
    Qun Zhao
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 6761 - 6770
  • [46] Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of prospective observational studies
    Zheng Bobo
    Wang Xin
    Li Jiang
    Wang Quan
    Bi Liang
    Deng Xiangbing
    Wang Ziqiang
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 1033 - 1048
  • [47] Robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Xianzhe
    Lei, Wenyi
    Zhu, Lingling
    Qi, Fan
    Liu, Yanyang
    Feng, Qingbo
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025, 48 (01) : 21 - 31
  • [48] A comparison of total versus partial omentectomy for advanced gastric cancer in laparoscopic gastrectomy
    Dong Jin Kim
    Jun Hyun Lee
    Wook Kim
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 12
  • [49] A comparison of total versus partial omentectomy for advanced gastric cancer in laparoscopic gastrectomy
    Kim, Dong Jin
    Lee, Jun Hyun
    Kim, Wook
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 12
  • [50] Laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Orsenigo, E.
    di Palo, S.
    Tamburini, A.
    Nifosi, J.
    Staudacher, C.
    GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA, 2009, 30 (05): : 119 - 119