Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a prospective trial-based economic evaluation

被引:7
|
作者
Lu, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Dong [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Jiao-bao [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Jia [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Bin-bin [1 ,2 ]
Xue, Zhen [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Hua-Long [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Guo-sheng [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Li-li [1 ,2 ]
Li, Ping [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jia-Bin [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Jian-Xian [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Qi-Yue [1 ,2 ]
Cao, Long-Long [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Jian-Wei [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Chao-Hui [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Chang-Ming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Dept Gastr Surg, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Robotic; Cost-effectiveness; Gastrectomy; Gastric cancer; OF-LIFE OUTCOMES; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-023-10147-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
ImportanceIt is largely unclear whether robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) is cost-effective for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RDG, laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG), and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for patients with LAGC.Design, setting, and participantsInverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics. A decision-analytic model was constructed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RDG, LDG, and ODG.ExposuresRDG, LDG, and ODG.Main outcomes and measuresIncremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life year (QALY).ResultsThis pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials included 449 patients: 117, 254, and 78 patients in the RDG, LDG, and ODG groups, respectively. After IPTW, RDG demonstrated its priority in terms of less blood loss, postoperative length, and complication rate (all P < 0.05). RDG also showed higher QOL with more cost, representing an ICER of $85,739.73 per QALY and $42,189.53 per QALY compared to LDG and ODG, respectively. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, RDG achieved the best cost-effectiveness for patients with LAGC only when the willingness-to-pay threshold was > $85,739.73 per QALY, which significantly exceeded 3 times Chinese per capita GDP. Furthermore, one of the most important factors was the indirect costs of robotic surgery in terms of the cost-effectiveness of RDG compared to that of LDG or ODG.Conclusions and relevanceAlthough improved short-term outcomes and QOL were seen in patients underwent RDG, the economic burden should be considered in the clinical decision-making regarding robotic surgery use for patients with LAGC. Our findings may vary in different health care settings and affordability.Trial registration CLASS-01 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, CT01609309) and FUGES-011 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03313700).
引用
收藏
页码:7472 / 7485
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robotic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer
    Yang, Yafan
    Wang, Guiying
    He, Jingli
    Wu, Fengpeng
    Ren, Shuguang
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 143 (01) : 105 - 114
  • [32] Comparison of robotic versus open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
    Sutandi, Nathania
    Robinson, Stuart
    Logue, Jennifer
    Kanwar, Aditya
    Charnley, Richard
    Manas, Derek
    Sen, Gourab
    Thakkar, Rohan
    Wilson, Colin
    French, Jeremy
    White, Steve
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 : 33 - 34
  • [33] COMPARISON OF ROBOTIC VERSUS OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY
    Sutandi, N.
    Robinson, S. M.
    French, J. J.
    Sen, G.
    Thakkar, R.
    Manas, D. M.
    Charnley, R. M.
    White, S. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 : 35 - 36
  • [34] Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Subgroup analysis of a multicenter prospective comparative study of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy
    Park, Joong-Min
    Kim, Hyoung-Il
    Han, Sang Uk
    Yang, Han-Kwang
    Kim, Young Woo
    Lee, Hyuk-Joon
    An, Ji Yeong
    Kim, Min-Chan
    Park, Sungsoo
    Song, Kyo Young
    Oh, Sung Jin
    Kong, Seong-Ho
    Suh, Byoung Jo
    Yang, Dae Hyun
    Ha, Tae Kyung
    Hyung, Woo Jin
    Ryu, Keun Won
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [35] Laparoscopic versus open approach in gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review
    Zhipeng Zhu
    Lulu Li
    Jiuhua Xu
    Weipeng Ye
    Junjie Zeng
    Borong Chen
    Zhengjie Huang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 18
  • [36] Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer Operative and postoperative results
    Raakow, J.
    Denecke, C.
    Chopra, S.
    Fritz, J.
    Hofmann, T.
    Andreou, A.
    Thuss-Patience, P.
    Pratschke, J.
    Biebl, M.
    CHIRURG, 2020, 91 (03): : 252 - 261
  • [37] Laparoscopic versus open approach in gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review
    Zhu, Zhipeng
    Li, Lulu
    Xu, Jiuhua
    Ye, Weipeng
    Zeng, Junjie
    Chen, Borong
    Huang, Zhengjie
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [38] Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective analysis from a single institution
    Wei, Chia-, I
    Liang, Tsung-Jung
    Hsu, Chia-Yuan
    Tsai, Chung-Yu
    Chen, I-Shu
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (01) : 222 - 227
  • [39] Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Short and Long-Term Results
    Di Carlo, Sara
    Siragusa, Leandro
    Fassari, Alessia
    Fiori, Enrico
    La Rovere, Francesca
    Izzo, Paolo
    Usai, Valeria
    Cavallaro, Giuseppe
    Franceschilli, Marzia
    Dhimolea, Sirvjo
    Sibio, Simone
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (11) : 8442 - 8455
  • [40] Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: safety and short-term oncologic results
    Li, Ziyu
    Shan, Fei
    Wang, Yinkui
    Li, Shuangxi
    Jia, Yongning
    Zhang, Lianhai
    Yin, Daoxin
    Ji, Jianfu
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (10): : 4265 - 4271