Device-device interaction between cardiac implantable electronic devices and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices

被引:7
|
作者
Tanawuttiwat, Tanyanan [1 ,2 ]
Das, Mithilesh K. [1 ]
Miller, John M. [1 ]
Guglin, Maya E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Div Cardiovasc Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, 1800 N Capitol Ave,E300B, Indian, IN 46202 USA
关键词
Cardiac implantable electronic device; Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Leadless pacemaker; Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defi-brillator; ELECTROMAGNETIC-INTERFERENCE; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR; PATIENT; SYSTEM; LVAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.02.020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The current design of an innovative left ventricular assist device (LVAD) makes use of magnetic levitation technology, which enables the rotors of the device to be completely suspended by magnetic force, reducing friction and blood or plasma damage. However, this electromagnetic field can result in electromagnetic interference (EMI), which can interfere with proper functioning of another car-diac implantable electronic device (CIED) in its direct proximity. Approximately 80% of patients with an LVAD have a CIED, most frequently an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Several device-device interactions have been reported, including EMI -induced inappropriate shocks, inability to establish telemetry connection, EMI-induced premature battery depletion, undersens-ing by the device, and other CIED malfunctions. Unfortunately, additional procedures, including generator exchange, lead adjust-ment, and system extraction, are frequently required because of these interactions. In some circumstances, the additional procedure might be preventable or avoidable with appropriate solutions. In this article, we describe how EMI from the LVAD impacts the func-tionality of the CIED and provide possible management options, including manufacturer-specific information, for the current CIEDs (eg, transvenous and leadless pacemakers, transvenous and subcu-taneous ICDs, and transvenous cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers and ICDs).
引用
收藏
页码:918 / 926
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Biventricular support using implantable continuous-flow ventricular assist devices
    Saito, Shunsuke
    Sakaguchi, Taichi
    Miyagawa, Shigeru
    Yoshikawa, Yasushi
    Yamauchi, Takashi
    Ueno, Takayoshi
    Kuratani, Toru
    Sawa, Yoshiki
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 30 (04): : 475 - 478
  • [32] Physiology of Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy
    Rosenbaum, Andrew N.
    Antaki, James F.
    Behfar, Atta
    Villavicencio, Mauricio A.
    Stulak, John
    Kushwaha, Sudhir S.
    COMPREHENSIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 12 (01) : 2731 - 2767
  • [33] Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device and the Right Ventricle
    Puhlman, Mark
    AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 23 (01) : 86 - 90
  • [34] Lead Extraction for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Black-Maier, Eric
    Piccini, Jonathan P.
    Bishawi, Muath
    Pokorney, Sean D.
    Bryner, Benjamin
    Schroder, Jacob N.
    Fowler, Vance G., Jr.
    Katz, Jason N.
    Haney, John C.
    Milano, Carmelo A.
    Nicoara, Alina
    Hegland, Donald D.
    Daubert, James P.
    Lewis, Robert K.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 6 (06) : 672 - 680
  • [35] Management of Arrhythmias and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Ho, Gordon
    Braun, Oscar O.
    Adler, Eric D.
    Feld, Gregory K.
    Pretorius, Victor G.
    Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 4 (07) : 847 - 859
  • [36] Third-generation continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a comparative outcome analysis by device type
    Mihalj, Maks
    Heinisch, Paul Philipp
    Schober, Patrick
    Wieser, Monika
    Martinelli, Michele
    de By, Theo M. M. H.
    Schefold, Joerg C.
    Luedi, Markus M.
    Kadner, Alexander
    Carrel, Thierry
    Mohacsi, Paul
    Hunziker, Lukas
    Reineke, David
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2022, 9 (05): : 3469 - 3482
  • [37] Propensity matched comparison of two different continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. A matter of device?
    Bejko, J. Jonida
    Bottio, T.
    Carrozzini, M.
    Comisso, M.
    Toto, F.
    Tarzia, V.
    Lombardi, C.
    Gregori, D.
    Metra, M.
    Gerosa, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2017, 19 : 114 - 114
  • [38] Arrhythmias in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices after Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Rosenbaum, Andrew N.
    Kremers, Walter K.
    Duval, Sue
    Sakaguchi, Scott
    John, Ranjit
    Eckman, Peter M.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2016, 62 (03) : 274 - 280
  • [39] Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Systems
    Berg, David D.
    Vaduganathan, Muthiah
    Upadhyay, Gaurav A.
    Singh, Jagmeet P.
    Mehra, Mandeep R.
    Stewart, Garrick C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (13) : 1483 - 1493
  • [40] Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices induce Left ventricular reverse remodeling
    Jacobs, Steven
    Geens, Jef
    Rega, Filip
    Burkhoff, Daniel
    Meyns, Bart
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 32 (04): : 466 - 468