Design and validation of a new Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) for clinical decision support systems: a mixed-methods approach

被引:1
|
作者
Ghorayeb, Abir [1 ]
Darbyshire, Julie L. [2 ]
Wronikowska, Marta W. [1 ]
Watkinson, Peter J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Clin Neurosci, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[3] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Kadoorie Ctr Crit Care Res & Educ, Oxford, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 01期
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Information technology; Health informatics; Health & safety; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Telemedicine; Quality in health care; SAMPLE-SIZE; CONTENT VALIDITY; PAIN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065323
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo develop and validate a questionnaire to assess the usability of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and to assist in the early identification of usability issues that may impact patient safety and quality of care. DesignMixed research methods were used to develop and validate the questionnaire. The qualitative study involved scale item development, content and face validity. Pilot testing established construct validity using factor analysis and facilitated estimates for reliability and internal consistency using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. SettingTwo hospitals within a single National Health Service Trust. ParticipantsWe recruited a panel of 7 experts in usability and questionnaire writing for health purposes to test content validity; 10 participants to assess face validity and 78 participants for the pilot testing. To be eligible for this last phase, participants needed to be health professionals with at least 3 months experience using the local hospital electronic patient record system. ResultsFeedback from the face and content validity phases contributed to the development and improvement of scale items. The final Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) proved quick to complete, easy to understand and was mostly worded by potential users. Exploratory analysis revealed four factors related to patient safety, task execution, alerts or recommendations accuracy, the effects of the system on workflow and ease of system use. These separate into four subscales: patient safety and decision effectiveness (seven items), workflow integration (six items), work effectiveness (five items) and user control (four items). These factors affect the quality of care and clinician's ability to make informed and timely decisions when using CDSS. The HSUS has a very good reliability with global Cronbach's alpha 0.914 and between 0.702 and 0.926 for the four subscales. ConclusionThe HSUS is a valid and reliable tool for usability testing of CDSS and early identification of usability issues that may cause medical adverse events.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Incorporating usability design factors into development of Clinical Decision Support Systems
    Yang, L
    Frize, M
    Eng, P
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4: A NEW BEGINNING FOR HUMAN HEALTH, 2003, 25 : 3594 - 3597
  • [2] Mixed-methods approach to understanding clinician macrocognition in the design of a clinical decision support tool: a study protocol
    Assadi, Azadeh
    Laussen, Peter
    Trbovich, Patricia
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [3] Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach
    Wong, Adrian
    Berenbrok, Lucas A.
    Snader, Lauren
    Soh, Yu Hyeon
    Kumar, Vishakha K.
    Javed, Muhammad Ali
    Bates, David W.
    Sorce, Lauren R.
    Kane-Gill, Sandra L.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE EXPLORATIONS, 2023, 5 (09)
  • [4] Medical practitioner's adoption of intelligent clinical diagnostic decision support systems: A mixed-methods study
    Prakash, Ashish Viswanath
    Das, Saini
    [J]. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 58 (07)
  • [5] Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
    Meunier, Pierre -Yves
    Raynaud, Camille
    Guimaraes, Emmanuelle
    Gueyffier, Francois
    Letrilliart, Laurent
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2023, 21 (01) : 57 - 69
  • [6] Methods used to evaluate usability of mobile clinical decision support systems for healthcare emergencies: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis
    Wohlgemut, Jared M.
    Pisirir, Erhan
    Kyrimi, Evangelia
    Stoner, Rebecca S.
    Marsh, William
    Perkins, Zane B.
    Tai, Nigel R. M.
    [J]. JAMIA OPEN, 2023, 6 (03)
  • [7] The Iterative Convergent Design for Mobile Health Usability Testing: Mixed-Methods Approach
    Alwashmi, Meshari F.
    Hawboldt, John
    Davis, Erin
    Fetters, Michael D.
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2019, 7 (04):
  • [8] Performance assessment of the county healthcare systems in Kenya: a mixed-methods analysis
    Moses, Mark W.
    Korir, Julius
    Zeng, Wu
    Musiega, Anita
    Oyasi, Joyce
    Lu, Ruoyan
    Chuma, Jane
    Di Giorgio, Laura
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 6 (06):
  • [9] Staff pooling in healthcare systems - results from a mixed-methods study
    Fagefors, Carina
    Lantz, Bjorn
    Rosen, Peter
    Siljemyr, Levi
    [J]. HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2024, 13 (01) : 31 - 47
  • [10] EvalCHOICE: A Decision Support Approach for the Usability Evaluation of Interactive Adaptive Systems
    Dhouib, Amira
    Trabelsi, Abdelawheb
    Kolski, Christophe
    Neji, Mahmoud
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 2017, 112 : 864 - 873