Design and validation of a new Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) for clinical decision support systems: a mixed-methods approach

被引:1
|
作者
Ghorayeb, Abir [1 ]
Darbyshire, Julie L. [2 ]
Wronikowska, Marta W. [1 ]
Watkinson, Peter J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Clin Neurosci, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[3] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Kadoorie Ctr Crit Care Res & Educ, Oxford, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 01期
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Information technology; Health informatics; Health & safety; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Telemedicine; Quality in health care; SAMPLE-SIZE; CONTENT VALIDITY; PAIN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065323
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo develop and validate a questionnaire to assess the usability of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and to assist in the early identification of usability issues that may impact patient safety and quality of care. DesignMixed research methods were used to develop and validate the questionnaire. The qualitative study involved scale item development, content and face validity. Pilot testing established construct validity using factor analysis and facilitated estimates for reliability and internal consistency using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. SettingTwo hospitals within a single National Health Service Trust. ParticipantsWe recruited a panel of 7 experts in usability and questionnaire writing for health purposes to test content validity; 10 participants to assess face validity and 78 participants for the pilot testing. To be eligible for this last phase, participants needed to be health professionals with at least 3 months experience using the local hospital electronic patient record system. ResultsFeedback from the face and content validity phases contributed to the development and improvement of scale items. The final Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) proved quick to complete, easy to understand and was mostly worded by potential users. Exploratory analysis revealed four factors related to patient safety, task execution, alerts or recommendations accuracy, the effects of the system on workflow and ease of system use. These separate into four subscales: patient safety and decision effectiveness (seven items), workflow integration (six items), work effectiveness (five items) and user control (four items). These factors affect the quality of care and clinician's ability to make informed and timely decisions when using CDSS. The HSUS has a very good reliability with global Cronbach's alpha 0.914 and between 0.702 and 0.926 for the four subscales. ConclusionThe HSUS is a valid and reliable tool for usability testing of CDSS and early identification of usability issues that may cause medical adverse events.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical decision support systems to guide healthcare providers on HIV testing
    Smit, Mikaela
    Jordans, Carlijn C. E.
    Reinhard, Jitte M.
    Bramer, Wichor M.
    Verbon, Annelies
    Rokx, Casper
    Calmy, Alexandra
    [J]. AIDS, 2022, 36 (08) : 1083 - 1093
  • [22] Technology readiness assessment: Case of clinical decision support systems in healthcare
    Laraichi, Oussama
    Daim, Tugrul
    Alzahrani, Saeed
    Hogaboam, Liliya
    Bolatan, Gulin Idil
    Moughari, Mahdieh Mokthtari
    [J]. Technology in Society, 2024, 79
  • [23] Clinical validation of clinical decision support systems for medication review: A scoping review
    Damoiseaux-Volman, Birgit A.
    Medlock, Stephanie
    van der Meulen, Delanie M.
    de Boer, Jesse
    Romijn, Johannes A.
    van der Velde, Nathalie
    Abu-Hanna, Ameen
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 88 (05) : 2035 - 2051
  • [24] DECISION-MODELING METHODS USED TO DESIGN DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR STAFFING
    NUTT, PC
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1984, 22 (11) : 1002 - 1013
  • [25] The teacher-class relationship A mixed-methods approach to validating a new scale
    Roza, Julia M. G.
    Frenzel, Anne C.
    Klassen, Robert M.
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE, 2021,
  • [26] Stigma and Healthcare-Seeking Practices of Men Who Have Sex with Men in Western Kenya: A Mixed-Methods Approach for Scale Validation
    Shangani, Sylvia
    Naanyu, Violet
    Operario, Don
    Genberg, Becky
    [J]. AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS, 2018, 32 (11) : 477 - 486
  • [27] New Approach to Privacy-Preserving Clinical Decision Support Systems for HIV Treatment
    Spini, Gabriele
    Mancini, Emiliano
    Attema, Thomas
    Abspoel, Mark
    de Gier, Jan
    Fehr, Serge
    Veugen, Thijs
    van Heesch, Maran
    Worm, Daniel
    De Luca, Andrea
    Cramer, Ronald
    Sloot, Peter M. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2022, 46 (12)
  • [28] New Approach to Privacy-Preserving Clinical Decision Support Systems for HIV Treatment
    Gabriele Spini
    Emiliano Mancini
    Thomas Attema
    Mark Abspoel
    Jan de Gier
    Serge Fehr
    Thijs Veugen
    Maran van Heesch
    Daniël Worm
    Andrea De Luca
    Ronald Cramer
    Peter M.A. Sloot
    [J]. Journal of Medical Systems, 46
  • [29] Usability evaluation of pharmacogenomics clinical decision support aids and clinical knowledge resources in a computerized provider order entry system: A mixed methods approach
    Devine, Emily Beth
    Lee, Chia-Ju
    Overby, Casey L.
    Abernethy, Neil
    McCune, Jeannine
    Smith, Joe W.
    Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 83 (07) : 473 - 483
  • [30] Meta-design knowledge for Clinical Decision Support Systems
    Miah, Shah
    Blake, Jacqueline
    Kerr, Don
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2020, 24 : 1 - 21