Medical practitioner's adoption of intelligent clinical diagnostic decision support systems: A mixed-methods study

被引:48
|
作者
Prakash, Ashish Viswanath [1 ]
Das, Saini [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Vinod Gupta Sch Management, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Technology adoption; User resistance; Mixed-methods design; Structural equations modelling; Intelligent clinical diagnostic decision support systems; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; INITIAL TRUST FORMATION; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; HEALTH-CARE; USER RESISTANCE; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; STATUS-QUO; PERFORMANCE; PHYSICIANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.im.2021.103524
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence-based clinical diagnostic decision support systems promise transformational improvements in doctors' efficiency and accuracy. Nevertheless, low adoption rates suggest that this innovation could fail without adequate uptake. This study uses a mixed-methods approach to develop and test a model based on theories of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, status quo bias, and technology trust. The results show that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, initial trust, and resistance to change predict intention to use. Further, inertia, perceived threat, and risks (medico-legal and performance) determine resistance to change. Measures for alleviating resistance and improving adoption are proposed.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uptake of a Cervical Cancer Clinical Decision Support Tool: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Huguet, Nathalie
    Ezekiel-Herrera, David
    Gunn, Rose
    Pierce, Alison
    O'Malley, Jean
    Jones, Matthew
    Marino, Miguel
    Gold, Rachel
    [J]. APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 14 (03): : 594 - 599
  • [2] Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
    Meunier, Pierre -Yves
    Raynaud, Camille
    Guimaraes, Emmanuelle
    Gueyffier, Francois
    Letrilliart, Laurent
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2023, 21 (01) : 57 - 69
  • [3] Facilitators and Barriers to Interacting With Clinical Decision Support in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Approach
    Wong, Adrian
    Berenbrok, Lucas A.
    Snader, Lauren
    Soh, Yu Hyeon
    Kumar, Vishakha K.
    Javed, Muhammad Ali
    Bates, David W.
    Sorce, Lauren R.
    Kane-Gill, Sandra L.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE EXPLORATIONS, 2023, 5 (09)
  • [4] Design and validation of a new Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) for clinical decision support systems: a mixed-methods approach
    Ghorayeb, Abir
    Darbyshire, Julie L.
    Wronikowska, Marta W.
    Watkinson, Peter J.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [5] Mixed-methods approach to understanding clinician macrocognition in the design of a clinical decision support tool: a study protocol
    Assadi, Azadeh
    Laussen, Peter
    Trbovich, Patricia
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [6] INTELLIGENT CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
    Floares, Alexandru G.
    [J]. HEALTHINF 2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2010, : 282 - 287
  • [7] Clinical decision-making at the end of life: a mixed-methods study
    Taylor, Paul
    Johnson, Miriam J.
    Dowding, Dawn Wendy
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 10 (03)
  • [8] Perceptions and drivers of the metaverse adoption: A mixed-methods study
    Adhini, Nandini Venkatesh
    Prasad, Ch. V. V. S. N. V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2024, 48 (04)
  • [9] Retrieval-Based Diagnostic Decision Support: Mixed Methods Study
    Abdullahi, Tassallah
    Mercurio, Laura
    Singh, Ritambhara
    Eickhoff, Carsten
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 12
  • [10] Exploring the Clinical Usefulness of Undergraduate Medical Research: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Burke, Emma
    Savage, Colm
    Begley, John
    Sioufi, Stephanie
    Smith, Simon
    Stoyanov, Slavi
    O'Tuathaigh, Colm
    [J]. MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR, 2024, 34 (04) : 823 - 830