Mortality of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus of meropenem: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:1
|
作者
Ai, Ming-Ying [1 ]
Chang, Wei-Lun [1 ]
Liu, Chia-Ying [2 ]
机构
[1] Far Eastern Mem Hosp, Dept Pharm, New Taipei City, Taiwan
[2] Far Eastern Mem Hosp, Dept Internal Med, New Taipei City, Taiwan
关键词
continuous infusion; meropenem; mortality; resistant pathogens; bacterial eradication; BETA-LACTAM ANTIBIOTICS; SEVERE SEPSIS;
D O I
10.3389/fmicb.2024.1337570
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background Meropenem belongs to the carbapenem class, which is categorized as beta-lactam antibiotics. These antibiotics are administered in intermittent bolus doses at specific time intervals. However, the continuous infusion approach ensures sustained drug exposure, maintaining the drug concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) throughout the entire treatment period. This study aimed to find out the association between continuous infusions of meropenem and mortality rates. Materials and methods We conducted a search of the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up to 14 August 2023. The six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and included in our analysis. The random-effects model was implemented using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software to examine the outcomes. Results Our study included a total of 1,529 adult patients from six randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome indicated that continuous infusion of meropenem did not lead to reduction in the mortality rate (odds ratio = 0.844, 95% CI: 0.671-1.061, P =0.147). Secondary outcomes revealed no significant differences in ICU length of stay (LOS), ICU mortality, clinical cure, or adverse events between continuous infusion and traditional intermittent bolus strategies of meropenem. Notably, we observed significant improvements in bacterial eradication (odds ratio 19 = 2.207, 95% CI: 1.467-3.320, P < 0.001) with continuous infusion of meropenem. Our study also suggested that performing continuous infusion may lead to better bacterial eradication effects in resistant pathogens (coefficient: 2.5175, P = 0.0138*). Conclusion Continuous infusion of meropenem did not result in the reduction of mortality rates but showed potential in improving bacterial eradication. Furthermore, this strategy may be particularly beneficial for achieving better bacterial eradication, especially in cases involving resistant pathogens.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prolonged versus intermittent β-lactam infusion in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhao, Yang
    Zang, Bin
    Wang, Qian
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [2] Prolonged versus intermittent β-lactam infusion in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yang Zhao
    Bin Zang
    Qian Wang
    Annals of Intensive Care, 14
  • [3] Continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus furosemide in ADHF: An updated meta-analysis of randomized control trials
    Amer, Muhammad
    Adomaityte, Jurga
    Qayyum, Rehan
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2012, 7 (03) : 270 - 275
  • [4] Clinical outcomes of prolonged infusion (extended infusion or continuous infusion) versus intermittent bolus of meropenem in severe infection: A meta-analysis
    Yu, Zhenwei
    Pang, Xiaoping
    Wu, Xuqi
    Shan, Chunlei
    Jiang, Saiping
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [5] Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liu, Xian
    Zhang, Huan
    Zhang, Haijing
    Guo, Mengzhuo
    Gao, Yuanchao
    Du, Chunyan
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (06):
  • [6] Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Bolus Injection of Furosemide in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ng, Ka Ting
    Velayit, Aslinah
    Khoo, Delton Kah Yeang
    Ismail, Amirah Mohd
    Mansor, Marzida
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2018, 32 (05) : 2303 - 2310
  • [7] CONTINUOUS INFUSION VERSUS INTERMITTENT BOLUS FUROSEMIDE FOR ACUTE DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Shastri, Pinang
    Burmeister, Cameron
    Tomcho, Jeremy
    Patel, Mitra
    Elzanaty, Ahmed
    Bhuta, Sapan
    Patel, Neha
    Sajdeya, Omar
    Mhanna, Mohammed
    Ghazaleh, Sami
    Beran, Azizullah
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (18) : 616 - 616
  • [8] CONTINUOUS VERSUS BOLUS INFUSION OF FUROSEMIDE: A META-ANALYSIS OF PARALLEL-GROUP RANDOMIZED TRIALS
    Kuriyama, Akira
    Urushidani, Seigo
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47
  • [9] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Programmed Intermittent Bolus and Continuous Infusion as the Background Infusion for Parturient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia
    Jiqian Xu
    Jie Zhou
    Hairong Xiao
    Shangwen Pan
    Jie Liu
    You Shang
    Shanglong Yao
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [10] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Programmed Intermittent Bolus and Continuous Infusion as the Background Infusion for Parturient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia
    Xu, Jiqian
    Zhou, Jie
    Xiao, Hairong
    Pan, Shangwen
    Liu, Jie
    Shang, You
    Yao, Shanglong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)