Mortality of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus of meropenem: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:1
|
作者
Ai, Ming-Ying [1 ]
Chang, Wei-Lun [1 ]
Liu, Chia-Ying [2 ]
机构
[1] Far Eastern Mem Hosp, Dept Pharm, New Taipei City, Taiwan
[2] Far Eastern Mem Hosp, Dept Internal Med, New Taipei City, Taiwan
关键词
continuous infusion; meropenem; mortality; resistant pathogens; bacterial eradication; BETA-LACTAM ANTIBIOTICS; SEVERE SEPSIS;
D O I
10.3389/fmicb.2024.1337570
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background Meropenem belongs to the carbapenem class, which is categorized as beta-lactam antibiotics. These antibiotics are administered in intermittent bolus doses at specific time intervals. However, the continuous infusion approach ensures sustained drug exposure, maintaining the drug concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) throughout the entire treatment period. This study aimed to find out the association between continuous infusions of meropenem and mortality rates. Materials and methods We conducted a search of the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases up to 14 August 2023. The six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and included in our analysis. The random-effects model was implemented using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software to examine the outcomes. Results Our study included a total of 1,529 adult patients from six randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome indicated that continuous infusion of meropenem did not lead to reduction in the mortality rate (odds ratio = 0.844, 95% CI: 0.671-1.061, P =0.147). Secondary outcomes revealed no significant differences in ICU length of stay (LOS), ICU mortality, clinical cure, or adverse events between continuous infusion and traditional intermittent bolus strategies of meropenem. Notably, we observed significant improvements in bacterial eradication (odds ratio 19 = 2.207, 95% CI: 1.467-3.320, P < 0.001) with continuous infusion of meropenem. Our study also suggested that performing continuous infusion may lead to better bacterial eradication effects in resistant pathogens (coefficient: 2.5175, P = 0.0138*). Conclusion Continuous infusion of meropenem did not result in the reduction of mortality rates but showed potential in improving bacterial eradication. Furthermore, this strategy may be particularly beneficial for achieving better bacterial eradication, especially in cases involving resistant pathogens.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic versus robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Imsirovic, Anja
    Nyame, Sandra A.
    Miles, William F. A.
    Sains, Parv
    Singh, Krishna K.
    Sajid, Muhammad S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 73 - 73
  • [32] Monovision Versus Multifocality for Presbyopia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Kelava, Lidija
    Baric, Hrvoje
    Busic, Mladen
    Cima, Ivan
    Trkulja, Vladimir
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2017, 34 (08) : 1815 - 1839
  • [33] Meta-Analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Continuous Infusion vs Intravenous Bolus Administration of Terlipressin in Patients With Cirrhosis
    Singh, Sahib
    Mohan, Babu
    Sharma, Neil
    Vinayek, Rakesh
    Dutta, Sudhir
    Le, Michelle
    Adler, Douglas G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S1217 - S1217
  • [34] Continuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Boluses of Furosemide in Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chan, Jeffrey Shi Kai
    Kot, Thompson Ka Ming
    Ng, Marcus
    Harky, Amer
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2020, 26 (09) : 786 - 793
  • [35] Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials versus placebo
    Gougain, Marion
    Coquelle, Elise
    Moreau, Alain
    Boussageon, Remy
    Pickering, Gisele
    Fauvel, Jean-Pierre
    Gueyffier, Francois
    EXERCER-LA REVUE FRANCOPHONE DE MEDECINE GENERALE, 2020, (161): : 124 - 132
  • [36] Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhu, Gui-Qi
    Zou, Zhuo-Lin
    Zheng, Ji-Na
    Chen, Da-Zhi
    Zou, Tian-Tian
    Shi, Ke-Qing
    Zheng, Ming-Hua
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (09)
  • [37] Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Randomized Controlled Trials in Cytopathology
    AbdullGaffar, Badr
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2012, 56 (03) : 221 - 227
  • [38] injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Daou, Marietou
    Dionne, Joanna C.
    Teng, Jennifer F. T.
    Taran, Shaurya
    Zytaruk, Nicole
    Cook, Deborah
    Wilcox, M. Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 71
  • [39] Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of furosemide in critically ill patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zangrillo, Alberto
    Cabrini, Luca
    Monti, Giacomo
    Stefano, Turi
    Moizo, Elena
    Vinciguerra, Federico
    Frau, Giovanna
    Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe G.
    SIGNA VITAE, 2011, 6 (02) : 58 - 63
  • [40] Continuous versus bolus intermittent loop diuretic infusion for acutely decompensated heart failure: meta-analysis
    Mousa, Mohammed
    Meshref, Ahmed
    Qalawena, Muhammad Mossad
    El Ameen, Nourhan
    Akl, Heba-Allah Hassan
    Farghali, Mohammed Abdelzaheer
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2016, 18 (0H) : H4 - H4