Prolonged versus intermittent β-lactam infusion in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:4
|
作者
Zhao, Yang [1 ]
Zang, Bin [1 ]
Wang, Qian [2 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, Shengjing Hosp, 36 Sanhao St, Shenyang 110000, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Dept Emergency, Affiliated Hosp 4, 4 Chongshan East Rd, Shenyang 110000, Peoples R China
关键词
Antibiotics; Cephalosporins; Carbapenems; Penicillin; Pharmacokinetics; Pharmacodynamics; Sepsis; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; SEPTIC SHOCK; INTRAVENOUS-INFUSION; INTENSIVE-CARE; OPEN-LABEL; ANTIBIOTICS; INFECTIONS; MEROPENEM; EFFICACY; TISSUE;
D O I
10.1186/s13613-024-01263-9
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe two latest studies on prolonged versus intermittent use of beta-lactam antibiotics in patients with sepsis did not reach consistent conclusions, further contributing to the controversy surrounding the effectiveness of the prolonged beta-lactam antibiotics infusion strategy. We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prolonged and intermittent beta-lactam infusion in adult patients with sepsis.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for original randomized controlled trials comparing prolonged and intermittent beta-lactam infusion in sepsis patients. A random-effects model was used to evaluate mortality, clinical success, microbiological success, and adverse events. We also conducted subgroup analyses to explore the impact of various factors on the mortality rates. Relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the overall effect sizes for dichotomous outcomes. This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023463905).ResultsWe assessed 15 studies involving 2130 patients. In our comprehensive assessment, we found a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR, 0.83; 95% CI 0.72-0.97; P = 0.02) and a notable improvement in clinical success (RR, 1.16; 95% CI 1.03-1.31; P = 0.02) in the prolonged infusion group compared to the intermittent infusion group, whereas microbiological success did not yield statistically significant results (RR, 1.10; 95% CI 0.98-1.23; P = 0.11). No significant differences in adverse events were observed between the two groups (RR, 0.91; 95% CI 0.64-1.29; P = 0.60). Additionally, remarkable conclusions were drawn from subgroup analyses including studies with sample sizes exceeding 20 individuals per group (RR, 0.84; 95%CI 0.72-0.98; P = 0.03), research conducted post-2010 (RR, 0.84; 95%CI 0.72-0.98; P = 0.03), cases involving infections predominantly caused by Gram-negative bacteria (RR, 0.81; 95%CI 0.68-0.96; P = 0.02), as well as the administration of a loading dose (RR, 0.84; 95% CI 0.72-0.97; P = 0.02) and the use of penicillin (RR, 0.61; 95% CI 0.38-0.98; P = 0.04).ConclusionsCompared to intermittent infusion, prolonged infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics significantly decreases all-cause mortality among patients with sepsis and enhances clinical success without increasing adverse events.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prolonged versus intermittent β-lactam infusion in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yang Zhao
    Bin Zang
    Qian Wang
    [J]. Annals of Intensive Care, 14
  • [2] Prolonged versus intermittent β-lactam antibiotics intravenous infusion strategy in sepsis or septic shock patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized trials
    Yutaka Kondo
    Kohei Ota
    Haruki Imura
    Naoki Hara
    Nobuaki Shime
    [J]. Journal of Intensive Care, 8
  • [3] Prolonged versus intermittent β-lactam antibiotics intravenous infusion strategy in sepsis or septic shock patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized trials
    Kondo, Yutaka
    Ota, Kohei
    Imura, Haruki
    Hara, Naoki
    Shime, Nobuaki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [4] Prolonged vs intermittent intravenous infusion of β-lactam antibiotics for patients with sepsis: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Li, Xiaoming
    Long, Yi
    Wu, Guixin
    Li, Rui
    Zhou, Mingming
    He, Aiting
    Jiang, Zhengying
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [5] Prolonged vs intermittent intravenous infusion of β-lactam antibiotics for patients with sepsis: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Xiaoming Li
    Yi Long
    Guixin Wu
    Rui Li
    Mingming Zhou
    Aiting He
    Zhengying Jiang
    [J]. Annals of Intensive Care, 13
  • [6] β-Lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors versus carbapenems for the treatment of sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shiber, Shachaf
    Yahav, Dafna
    Avni, Tomer
    Leibovici, Leonard
    Paul, Mical
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 70 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [7] Mortality of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus of meropenem: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ai, Ming-Ying
    Chang, Wei-Lun
    Liu, Chia-Ying
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [8] Continuous versus Intermittent β-Lactam Infusion in Severe Sepsis A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data from Randomized Trials
    Roberts, Jason A.
    Abdul-Aziz, Mohd-Hafiz
    Davis, Joshua S.
    Dulhunty, Joel M.
    Cotta, Menino O.
    Myburgh, John
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    Lipman, Jeffrey
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 194 (06) : 681 - 691
  • [9] Does prolonged β-lactam infusions improve clinical outcomes compared to intermittent infusions? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized, controlled trials
    Tamma, Pranita D.
    Putcha, Nirupama
    Suh, Yong D.
    Van Arendonk, Kyle J.
    Rinke, Michael L.
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 11
  • [10] Does prolonged β-lactam infusions improve clinical outcomes compared to intermittent infusions? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized, controlled trials
    Pranita D Tamma
    Nirupama Putcha
    Yong D Suh
    Kyle J Van Arendonk
    Michael L Rinke
    [J]. BMC Infectious Diseases, 11