Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Severe In-Stent Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting: Long-Term Outcomes and Review of Literature

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Jeong-Yoon [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Jonguk [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Do Yeon [4 ]
Kim, Jun Yup [4 ]
Baik, Sung Hyun [5 ]
Kang, Jihoon [4 ]
Kim, Beom Joon [4 ]
Bae, Hee-Joon [4 ]
Jung, Cheolkyu [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Seoul Hosp, Dept Neurol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Translat Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Inha Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Incheon, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Neurol, Seongnam, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seongnam, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Radiol, 82 Gumi ro 173beon gil, Seongnam 13620, South Korea
关键词
Carotid artery stenosis; Balloon angioplasty; Endovascular procedure; Stent; RECURRENT STENOSIS; ENDARTERECTOMY; RISK; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.5469/neuroint.2024.00010
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Cutting balloon-percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (CB-PTA) is a feasible treatment option for in-stent restenosis (ISR) after carotid artery stenting (CAS). However, the longterm durability and safety of CB-PTA for ISR after CAS have not been well established. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with ISR after CAS who had been treated with CB-PTA from 2012 to 2021 in our center. Detailed information of baseline characteristics, periprocedural and long-term outcomes, and follow-up imaging was collected. Results: During 2012-2021, a total of 301 patients underwent CAS. Of which, CB-PTA was performed on 20 lesions exhibiting severe ISR in 18 patients following CAS. No patient had any history of receiving carotid endarterectomy or radiation therapy. These lesions were located at the cervical segment of the internal carotid artery (n=16), proximal external carotid artery (n=1), and distal common carotid artery (n=1). The median time interval between initial CAS and detection of ISR was 390 days (interquartile range 324-666 days). The follow-up period ranged from 9 months to 9 years with a median value of 21 months. Four patients (22.2%) were symptomatic. The average of stenotic degree before and after the procedure was 79.2% and 34.7%, respectively. Out of the 18 patients receiving CB-PTA, 16 (88.9%) did not require additional stenting, and 16 (88.9%) did not experience recurrent ISR during the follow-up period. Two patients who experienced recurrent ISR were successfully treated with CB-PTA and additional stenting. No periprocedural complication was observed in any case. Conclusion: Regarding favorable periprocedural and long-term outcomes in our single-center experience, CB-PTA was a feasible and safe option for the treatment of severe ISR after CAS.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 30
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long-term Outcomes of Repeated Paclitaxel-coated Balloon Angioplasty for Recurrent Restenosis Lesions after Paclitaxel-coated Balloon Angioplasty for In-stent Restenosis
    Iwasaki, Keiichiro
    Kadota, Kazushige
    Kuwayama, Akimune
    Miura, Katsuya
    Ohya, Masanobu
    Shimada, Takenobu
    Kubo, Shunsuke
    Hyodo, Yusuke
    Otsuru, Suguru
    Habara, Seiji
    Tada, Takeshi
    Tanaka, Hiroyuki
    Fuku, Yasushi
    Goto, Tsuyoshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (18) : B159 - B160
  • [22] In-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty-stenting: Incidence and management
    Chakhtoura, EY
    Hobson, RW
    Goldstein, J
    Simonian, GT
    Lal, BK
    Haser, PB
    Silva, MB
    Padberg, FT
    Pappas, PJ
    Jamil, Z
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 33 (02) : 220 - 225
  • [23] In-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting: A challenge for the vascular surgeon
    Setacci, C
    de Donato, G
    Setacci, F
    Pieraccini, M
    Cappelli, A
    Trovato, RA
    Benevento, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 29 (06) : 601 - 607
  • [24] Determinants of In-stent Restenosis After Elective Carotid Artery Stenting
    Miyazaki, Y.
    Mori, T.
    Iwata, T.
    Takahashi, Y.
    Nakazaki, M.
    [J]. CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2013, 35 : 155 - 155
  • [25] Comparison of Angiographic Result and Long-Term Outcome in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis Treated With Cutting Balloon or With Scoring Balloon Angioplasty
    Leick, Juergen
    Tobias, Rheude
    Cassese, Salvatore
    Krause, Tobias
    Gjata, Anida
    Saad, Mhd Louai
    Lindner, Michael
    Afzal, Shazia
    Kastrati, Adnan
    Werner, Nikos
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 17 (04) : S21 - S21
  • [26] Long-term angiographic follow up after successful repeat balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis
    Galassi, AR
    Foti, R
    Azzarelli, S
    Condorelli, G
    Coco, G
    Ragusa, A
    Russo, G
    Grasso, A
    Bonaccorso, C
    Tamburino, C
    Giuffrida, G
    [J]. CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 24 (04) : 334 - 340
  • [27] Regarding "Patterns of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting: Classification and implications for long term outcome"
    de Borst, Gert J.
    Moll, Frans L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 47 (06) : 1379 - 1380
  • [28] Treatment of focal in-stent restenosis with balloon angioplasty alone versus stenting: Short- and long-term results
    Mehran, R
    Dangas, G
    Abizaid, A
    Lansky, AJ
    Mintz, GS
    Pichard, AD
    Satler, LF
    Kent, KM
    Waksman, R
    Stone, GW
    Leon, MB
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 141 (04) : 610 - 614
  • [29] Ultrasound criteria for severe in-stent restenosis following carotid artery stenting
    Zhou, Wei
    Felkai, Deborah D.
    Evans, Mark
    McCoy, Sally A.
    Lin, Peter H.
    Kougias, Panagiotos
    El-Sayed, Hosam F.
    Lumsden, Alan B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 47 (01) : 74 - 80
  • [30] The efficiency of cutting balloon angioplasty in the treatment of in-stent restenosis
    Ates, Haci
    Duygu, Hamza
    Cakir, Cayan
    Acet, Halit
    Akdemir, Sefa
    Akyildiz, Zehra Ilke
    Kocabas, Ugur
    Nazli, Cem
    Ergene, Oktay
    [J]. ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 11 (05): : 436 - 440