Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Severe In-Stent Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting: Long-Term Outcomes and Review of Literature

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Jeong-Yoon [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Jonguk [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Do Yeon [4 ]
Kim, Jun Yup [4 ]
Baik, Sung Hyun [5 ]
Kang, Jihoon [4 ]
Kim, Beom Joon [4 ]
Bae, Hee-Joon [4 ]
Jung, Cheolkyu [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Seoul Hosp, Dept Neurol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Translat Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Inha Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Incheon, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Neurol, Seongnam, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seongnam, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Radiol, 82 Gumi ro 173beon gil, Seongnam 13620, South Korea
关键词
Carotid artery stenosis; Balloon angioplasty; Endovascular procedure; Stent; RECURRENT STENOSIS; ENDARTERECTOMY; RISK; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.5469/neuroint.2024.00010
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Cutting balloon-percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (CB-PTA) is a feasible treatment option for in-stent restenosis (ISR) after carotid artery stenting (CAS). However, the longterm durability and safety of CB-PTA for ISR after CAS have not been well established. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with ISR after CAS who had been treated with CB-PTA from 2012 to 2021 in our center. Detailed information of baseline characteristics, periprocedural and long-term outcomes, and follow-up imaging was collected. Results: During 2012-2021, a total of 301 patients underwent CAS. Of which, CB-PTA was performed on 20 lesions exhibiting severe ISR in 18 patients following CAS. No patient had any history of receiving carotid endarterectomy or radiation therapy. These lesions were located at the cervical segment of the internal carotid artery (n=16), proximal external carotid artery (n=1), and distal common carotid artery (n=1). The median time interval between initial CAS and detection of ISR was 390 days (interquartile range 324-666 days). The follow-up period ranged from 9 months to 9 years with a median value of 21 months. Four patients (22.2%) were symptomatic. The average of stenotic degree before and after the procedure was 79.2% and 34.7%, respectively. Out of the 18 patients receiving CB-PTA, 16 (88.9%) did not require additional stenting, and 16 (88.9%) did not experience recurrent ISR during the follow-up period. Two patients who experienced recurrent ISR were successfully treated with CB-PTA and additional stenting. No periprocedural complication was observed in any case. Conclusion: Regarding favorable periprocedural and long-term outcomes in our single-center experience, CB-PTA was a feasible and safe option for the treatment of severe ISR after CAS.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 30
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Cutting balloon angioplasty for carotid in-stent restenosis: Case reports and review of the literature
    Shah, Qaisar A.
    Georgiadis, Alexandros L.
    Suri, M. Fareed K.
    Rodriguez, Gustavo J.
    Qureshi, Adnan I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2008, 18 (04) : 428 - 432
  • [3] Optical coherence tomography findings of balloon angioplasty/stenting for in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting
    Yamada, Shingo
    Harada, Kei
    Baba, Daichi
    Oshima, Takatusugu
    Tanaka, Koki
    [J]. INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [4] In-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting
    Setacci, C.
    de Donato, G.
    Chisci, E.
    Setacci, F.
    Sirignano, P.
    Galzerano, G.
    Cappelli, A.
    Palasciano, G.
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 15 (03): : 171 - 178
  • [5] Acute and long-term outcomes of cutting balloon angioplasty followed by gamma brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis
    Kobayashi, Y
    Mehran, R
    Mintz, GS
    Dangas, G
    Moussa, I
    Collins, M
    Brara, P
    Moussavian, M
    Lansky, AJ
    Stone, GW
    Leon, MB
    Moses, JW
    Teirstein, PS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 92 (11): : 1329 - 1331
  • [6] Prediction Model for In-Stent Restenosis After Carotid Artery Angioplasty and Stenting
    Liu, Sheng-Fu
    Chen, Ying-Hsien
    Lin, Mao-Shin
    Huang, Ching-Chang
    Yeh, Chih-Fan
    Tsai, Cheng-Hsuan
    Kao, Hsien-Li
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (16) : S1 - S1
  • [7] Carotid Artery In-Stent Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting
    Ener, Rasih Atilla
    Fiss, David
    Georgakis, Alexander
    Wolf, Nelson M.
    Pandit, Niraj
    Piegari, Guy N., Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 20 (06): : 286 - 291
  • [8] Cutting Balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis
    Kurbaan, AS
    Foale, RA
    Sigwart, U
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2000, 50 (04) : 480 - 483
  • [9] Cutting balloon angioplasty for resistant renal artery in-stent restenosis
    Munneke, GJ
    Engelke, C
    Morgan, RA
    Belli, AM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (03) : 327 - 331
  • [10] Overlap stenting for in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting
    Nishihori, Masahiro
    Ohshima, Tomotaka
    Yamamoto, Taiki
    Goto, Shunsaku
    Nishizawa, Toshihisa
    Shimato, Shinji
    Izumi, Takashi
    Kato, Kyozo
    [J]. NAGOYA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 78 (02): : 143 - 149