Robotics in Nursing: Protocol for a Scoping Review

被引:2
|
作者
Darko, Elizabeth Mirekuwaa [1 ,3 ]
Kleib, Manal [1 ]
Lemermeyer, Gillian [1 ]
Tavakoli, Mahdi [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Coll Hlth Sci, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Coll Nat & Appl Sci Elect & Comp Engn, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Coll Hlth Sci, Fac Nursing, 4-171 Edmonton Clin Hlth Acad, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2023年 / 12卷
关键词
automation; robots; nursing; nursing robots; nursing robotic technologies; NURSES;
D O I
10.2196/50626
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Globally, health care systems are challenged with the shortage of health care professionals, particularly nurses. The decline in the nursing workforce is primarily attributed to an aging population, increased demand for health care services, and a shortage of qualified nurses. Stressful working conditions have also increased the physical and emotional demands and perceptions of burnout, leading to attrition among nurses. Robotics has the potential to alleviate some of the workforce challenges by augmenting and supporting nurses in their roles; however, the impact of robotics on nurses is an understudied topic, and limited literature exists. Objective: We aim to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to robotics integration in nursing practice. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist will guide the scoping review. The MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Cochrane Library, and IEEE Xplore electronic bibliographic databases will be searched to retrieve papers. In addition, gray literature sources, including Google Scholar, dissertations, theses, registries, blogs, and relevant organizational websites will be searched. Furthermore, the reference lists of included studies retrieved from the databases and the gray literature will be hand-searched to ensure relevant papers are not missed. In total, 2 reviewers will independently screen retrieve papers at each stage of the screening process and independently extract data from the included studies. A third reviewer will be consulted to help decision-making if conflicts arise. Data analysis will be completed using both descriptive statistics and content analysis. The results will be presented using tabular and narrative formats. Results: The review is expected to describe the current evidence on the integration and impact of robots and robotics into nursing clinical practice, provide insights into the current state and knowledge gaps, identify a direction for future research, and inform policy and practice. The authors expect to begin the data searches in late January 2024. Conclusions: The robotics industry is evolving rapidly, providing different solutions that promise to revamp health care delivery with possible improvements to nursing practice. This review protocol outlines the steps proposed to systematically investigate this topic and provides an opportunity for more insights from scholars and researchers working in the field. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/50626
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Protocol for a scoping review on nursing care and the autonomy of disabled persons
    Schoeller, Soraia Dornelles
    Souza Lima, Daniella Karine
    Martins, Maria Manuela
    Souza Ramos, Flavia Regina
    Zuchetto, Milena Amorim
    da Silva Bampi, Luciana Neves
    Roos, Cristine Moraes
    Tholl, Adriana Dutra
    Julio Tonnera, Liliam Cristiana
    Alves Machado, Wiliam Cesar
    Vargas, Caroline Porcelis
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (10):
  • [12] Digital textbooks for undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol
    Jang, Aeri
    Park, Hyunyoung
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (07): : 1 - 4
  • [13] Treatment of sarcopenia in nursing home residents: a scoping review protocol
    Benzinger, Petra
    Bauer, Juergen Martin
    Schwenk, Michael
    Grund, Stefan
    Goisser, Sabine
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (08):
  • [14] Nursing Professional Self-Concept: A Scoping Review Protocol
    Almeida, Ines Franco
    Bernardes, Rafael Alves
    Sousa, Liliana Baptista
    Santos-Costa, Paulo
    Silva, Rosa
    Bernardo, Joana
    Santana, Elaine
    Rosa, Amorim
    NURSING REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01) : 51 - 56
  • [15] Entrustable professional activities in nursing education: a scoping review protocol
    Alexander, Nicholas
    Maaz, Asja
    Peters, Harm
    Kottner, Jan
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [16] Instruments for measuring nursing research competence: a protocol for a scoping review
    Chen, Qirong
    Huang, Chongmei
    Castro, Aimee R.
    Tang, Siyuan
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [17] Concept Mapping in Simulation within Nursing Education: A Scoping Review Protocol
    Innis, Jennifer
    Johnston, Sarah
    Cambly, Erica
    NURSING REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01) : 109 - 113
  • [18] Paediatric oncology nursing education and training programmes: a scoping review protocol
    Majamanda, Maureen Daisy
    Chisoni, Felix
    Selemani, Apatsa
    Kearns, Irene
    Maree, Johanna
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [19] Protocol for a scoping review on the conceptualisation of learning in undergraduate clinical nursing practice
    Stoffels, Malou
    Peerdeman, Saskia M.
    Daelmans, Hester E. M.
    Ket, Johannes C. F.
    Kusurkar, Rashmi A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [20] Nursing knowledge on skin ulcer healing: a living scoping review protocol
    Gomes, Joao
    Sousa, Paulino
    Pereira, Filipe
    Queiros, Carmen
    Neves, Hugo
    Silva, Catarina
    Paiva e Silva, Abel
    Parente, Paulo
    Sousa, Paula
    Brito, Alice
    Silva, Antonia Paiva E.
    Morais, Ernesto Jorge
    Cardoso, Alexandrina
    Cruz, Ines
    Machado, Natalia
    Oliveira, Fernando
    Bastos, Fernanda
    Prata, Paula
    Sequeira, Carlos
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (01) : 164 - 172